Results
An early-energy difference, carefully scoped.
Published comparison
D50 · 1000 Hz · Empty seating
Source S1 · At mouth · B minus A
Median difference, B − A+6.3 percentage points
Its conditional uncertainty, UM, is 0.5 percentage points. The median includes all 625 published paired map sample locations, not receiver ranks.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B) minus Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A): a positive value means D50 is higher in B.
This whole-configuration contrast isolates no single cause. The model is uncalibrated, and its geometry representation can affect local results; conditional ray-sampling uncertainty includes neither effect.
D50. The share of the sound energy reaching a receiver that arrives within 50 ms of the direct sound. It describes how the energy at one place divides between early and later arrivals; it is not a speech-intelligibility index (STI) or a score of overall acoustic quality. Higher is not simply better.
Reading the comparison
217 locations are resolved: differences exceed matched conditional uncertainty, without establishing audibility or statistical significance.
204 locations qualify: their differences have the median’s sign and exceed both matched uncertainty and the study’s effect scale of 5.0 percentage points. They form a subset of the resolved locations.
The matched uncertainty of each difference, written u2, exceeds the 5.0 percentage points precision target at 556 locations and meets it at 69. Precision and resolved/qualifying classifications overlap; do not add across them.
The map, sample by sample
Each map sample has an identifier (ID); A and B samples are paired by ID. IDs are matched records, not fixed points: common IDs share x and y, and z differs where the walking surface differs; absent-counterpart IDs are never paired with a neighbour. Samples are uninterpolated. Absolute maps share one scale; the contrast uses another.
D50 in configuration A
Enlarge to inspect marks: D50 in configuration A
Scale minimum: 49.9 %
Scale maximum: 98.2 %
D50 in configuration B
Enlarge to inspect marks: D50 in configuration B
Scale minimum: 49.9 %
Scale maximum: 98.2 %
Key for A and B
- Dashed outline: u2 larger than target.
- Cross: no published value.
- Centre dot: provisional or low confidence.
- Up/down triangle: value above/below scale; published colour retained.
D50 difference, B minus A
Enlarge to inspect marks: D50 difference, B minus A
Scale minimum: −50.0 percentage points
Scale maximum: +50.0 percentage points
Equal negative and positive limits.
- Slash: unresolved.
- Square: no counterpart.
Dashed outlines, crosses and range triangles use the shared key.
Colour is not significance.
Scale rule (verbatim)
limit = smallest value in {1, 2, 2.5, 5} x 10^k that is >= the largest |contrast| over every published map and seat location of every member pair
Read the markings as well as the colour.
Missing values have reasons, never zeros. Unresolved differences retain values; valid points can have u2 above the target. Unpaired samples remain visible in their own configuration without a contrast.
Model coordinates are shown in metres without rounding.
All map samples
Values and uncertainties are published unchanged. Select an identifier for exact positions, contrast inputs and statuses.
Focus this scroll region and use arrow keys.
Map samples and matched contrasts
| Sample identifierSelect for details | Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%) / u2 (percentage points) | Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%) / u2 (percentage points) | Difference, B − AD50 difference / matched u2 (both in percentage points) | Published statusA / B / B − A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.1 % / 1.5 percentage points | 78.2 % / 3.1 percentage points | −9.9 percentage points / 4.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.6 % / 1.9 percentage points | 83.8 % / 2.1 percentage points | −1.7 percentage points / 2.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.5 % / 2.0 percentage points | 86.1 % / 0.9 percentage points | +0.6 percentage points / 2.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.4 % / 2.7 percentage points | 85.2 % / 4.0 percentage points | −1.2 percentage points / 6.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.8 % / 4.5 percentage points | 80.0 % / 3.7 percentage points | −3.7 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.7 % / 5.3 percentage points | 51.1 % / 2.2 percentage points | −32.6 percentage points / 4.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.9 % / 8.3 percentage points | 74.7 % / 1.2 percentage points | −10.2 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 3.3 percentage points | 83.5 % / 2.9 percentage points | −0.8 percentage points / 4.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.6 % / 2.2 percentage points | 81.7 % / 2.3 percentage points | −1.9 percentage points / 2.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.8 % / 2.0 percentage points | 88.0 % / 2.9 percentage points | +1.2 percentage points / 1.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.8 % / 2.3 percentage points | 90.5 % / 2.5 percentage points | +3.7 percentage points / 4.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.5 % / 1.4 percentage points | 89.0 % / 1.2 percentage points | +0.6 percentage points / 2.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.8 % / 4.2 percentage points | 85.2 % / 1.9 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points / 2.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.8 % / 2.5 percentage points | 81.7 % / 3.1 percentage points | −4.1 percentage points / 2.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.7 % / 4.2 percentage points | 85.8 % / 2.6 percentage points | −0.9 percentage points / 3.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 4.5 percentage points | 82.9 % / 0.7 percentage points | −0.1 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.9 % / 4.8 percentage points | 84.0 % / 3.3 percentage points | +1.1 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.2 % / 4.5 percentage points | 82.1 % / 3.7 percentage points | +1.9 percentage points / 6.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.5 % / 2.9 percentage points | 78.8 % / 3.1 percentage points | −7.7 percentage points / 5.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 2.6 percentage points | 80.1 % / 4.9 percentage points | −1.5 percentage points / 5.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.7 % / 3.6 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 87.1 % / 2.0 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 86.0 % / 5.0 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 86.8 % / 2.2 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 85.5 % / 0.9 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 83.7 % / 3.5 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 80.6 % / 3.0 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 89.6 % / 2.7 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 76.0 % / 8.4 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 77.2 % / 6.3 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 79.2 % / 4.3 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 84.5 % / 5.0 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 80.7 % / 2.9 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 81.9 % / 6.6 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 83.0 % / 5.2 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 79.5 % / 4.2 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 84.7 % / 3.2 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 84.3 % / 5.0 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 81.6 % / 3.2 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 87.2 % / 3.6 percentage points | No counterpart | No contrast | Valid / Absent / Absent | |
| 86.1 % / 5.3 percentage points | 86.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | −0.0 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.5 % / 2.9 percentage points | 83.7 % / 6.8 percentage points | −3.8 percentage points / 4.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.6 % / 2.5 percentage points | 89.8 % / 5.5 percentage points | +2.2 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.0 % / 2.2 percentage points | 84.6 % / 6.1 percentage points | −1.4 percentage points / 4.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.4 % / 1.9 percentage points | 86.7 % / 4.3 percentage points | +1.2 percentage points / 3.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.4 % / 5.1 percentage points | 89.5 % / 3.0 percentage points | +2.1 percentage points / 4.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.6 % / 4.8 percentage points | 81.4 % / 3.3 percentage points | −3.2 percentage points / 4.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.1 % / 7.0 percentage points | 89.8 % / 3.9 percentage points | +4.7 percentage points / 9.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.3 % / 3.1 percentage points | 87.0 % / 4.3 percentage points | +4.6 percentage points / 4.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.1 % / 4.7 percentage points | 90.5 % / 3.7 percentage points | +8.4 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.1 % / 3.4 percentage points | 90.6 % / 7.3 percentage points | +8.5 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.6 % / 5.3 percentage points | 94.5 % / 2.1 percentage points | +10.9 percentage points / 5.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.9 % / 4.7 percentage points | 89.9 % / 2.7 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 5.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.1 % / 4.4 percentage points | 89.7 % / 1.8 percentage points | +3.7 percentage points / 5.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.6 % / 3.1 percentage points | 86.9 % / 4.1 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 7.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.5 % / 5.3 percentage points | 85.4 % / 5.7 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 4.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 3.8 percentage points | 84.4 % / 3.6 percentage points | +3.3 percentage points / 6.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 3.2 percentage points | 89.8 % / 2.5 percentage points | +9.3 percentage points / 3.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.8 % / 4.4 percentage points | 83.0 % / 2.8 percentage points | +1.2 percentage points / 8.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 3.0 percentage points | 81.6 % / 4.4 percentage points | −2.7 percentage points / 6.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 89.9 % / 3.6 percentage points | 87.6 % / 3.9 percentage points | −2.3 percentage points / 4.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.9 % / 2.8 percentage points | 89.3 % / 3.3 percentage points | +4.4 percentage points / 2.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.3 % / 1.8 percentage points | 83.3 % / 3.2 percentage points | −3.1 percentage points / 4.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.7 % / 3.9 percentage points | 88.4 % / 4.4 percentage points | +4.7 percentage points / 7.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | 86.3 % / 4.8 percentage points | −1.6 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.2 % / 3.7 percentage points | 89.1 % / 2.1 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points / 4.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.0 % / 2.5 percentage points | 88.6 % / 3.9 percentage points | +1.6 percentage points / 6.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.5 % / 2.4 percentage points | 89.5 % / 6.1 percentage points | +2.0 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.6 % / 2.9 percentage points | 86.8 % / 3.4 percentage points | +0.2 percentage points / 3.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.4 % / 3.8 percentage points | 88.2 % / 1.6 percentage points | −0.2 percentage points / 4.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.1 % / 4.0 percentage points | 86.7 % / 5.1 percentage points | +0.6 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.7 % / 5.1 percentage points | 90.6 % / 7.1 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points / 10.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 4.7 percentage points | 87.7 % / 1.8 percentage points | +3.6 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 3.7 percentage points | 91.3 % / 4.9 percentage points | +7.1 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.0 % / 3.9 percentage points | 96.0 % / 2.8 percentage points | +11.0 percentage points / 2.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.5 % / 5.6 percentage points | 92.6 % / 1.9 percentage points | +9.1 percentage points / 3.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 4.4 percentage points | 91.2 % / 2.8 percentage points | +7.0 percentage points / 6.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.1 % / 3.6 percentage points | 91.7 % / 2.9 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 2.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 3.5 percentage points | 87.3 % / 4.7 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.4 % / 6.7 percentage points | 88.4 % / 3.8 percentage points | +3.1 percentage points / 6.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.9 % / 3.2 percentage points | 83.2 % / 5.1 percentage points | −0.7 percentage points / 5.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.4 % / 6.6 percentage points | 86.3 % / 8.3 percentage points | +10.9 percentage points / 10.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.5 % / 2.6 percentage points | 89.5 % / 2.7 percentage points | +2.0 percentage points / 2.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.7 % / 2.4 percentage points | 87.5 % / 4.2 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 4.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.4 % / 1.8 percentage points | 87.5 % / 3.6 percentage points | +2.1 percentage points / 4.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.2 % / 3.4 percentage points | 85.8 % / 4.6 percentage points | −1.4 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.6 % / 4.9 percentage points | 87.3 % / 3.0 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points / 5.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.9 % / 3.5 percentage points | 82.4 % / 5.9 percentage points | −4.4 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.0 % / 5.3 percentage points | 84.6 % / 6.1 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 6.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.6 % / 3.9 percentage points | 88.9 % / 4.2 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 7.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 6.7 percentage points | 87.3 % / 4.2 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 8.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.5 % / 3.0 percentage points | 85.3 % / 5.1 percentage points | −3.2 percentage points / 4.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.2 % / 4.2 percentage points | 84.1 % / 7.5 percentage points | −1.1 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 89.4 % / 3.5 percentage points | 90.2 % / 4.7 percentage points | +0.8 percentage points / 5.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.6 % / 2.3 percentage points | 88.6 % / 4.1 percentage points | +3.0 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.8 % / 4.1 percentage points | 91.0 % / 5.1 percentage points | +3.3 percentage points / 5.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.2 % / 2.2 percentage points | 88.0 % / 3.3 percentage points | +0.8 percentage points / 3.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.8 % / 3.4 percentage points | 91.0 % / 4.1 percentage points | +5.3 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.9 % / 6.1 percentage points | 89.4 % / 3.0 percentage points | +4.5 percentage points / 5.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.0 % / 5.4 percentage points | 90.4 % / 3.2 percentage points | +6.4 percentage points / 5.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 10.8 percentage points | 89.1 % / 2.0 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 11.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.1 % / 7.0 percentage points | 93.3 % / 1.8 percentage points | +8.2 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.3 % / 8.6 percentage points | 91.6 % / 7.3 percentage points | +6.3 percentage points / 13.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.4 % / 1.8 percentage points | 91.9 % / 3.2 percentage points | +8.4 percentage points / 2.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.5 % / 2.6 percentage points | 93.0 % / 3.9 percentage points | +8.5 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.6 % / 5.9 percentage points | 90.9 % / 4.1 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 8.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.1 % / 6.4 percentage points | 89.3 % / 2.6 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points / 7.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.6 % / 3.0 percentage points | 87.6 % / 2.8 percentage points | −0.0 percentage points / 3.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.0 % / 4.7 percentage points | 88.7 % / 5.3 percentage points | +6.7 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.0 % / 3.8 percentage points | 87.5 % / 4.0 percentage points | +2.5 percentage points / 3.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.5 % / 4.8 percentage points | 91.1 % / 2.4 percentage points | +3.6 percentage points / 5.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.2 % / 5.8 percentage points | 89.1 % / 3.5 percentage points | +5.9 percentage points / 7.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.0 % / 4.8 percentage points | 87.9 % / 5.9 percentage points | +1.9 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.7 % / 2.6 percentage points | 91.6 % / 2.2 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points / 2.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.1 % / 6.0 percentage points | 86.0 % / 4.9 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.7 % / 3.5 percentage points | 87.4 % / 4.6 percentage points | +1.7 percentage points / 4.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.7 % / 3.2 percentage points | 87.2 % / 4.4 percentage points | +6.5 percentage points / 4.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.3 % / 7.9 percentage points | 88.0 % / 3.3 percentage points | +4.6 percentage points / 6.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.7 % / 5.1 percentage points | 88.9 % / 5.9 percentage points | +5.2 percentage points / 4.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.3 % / 4.5 percentage points | 88.3 % / 6.5 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points / 6.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.0 % / 8.1 percentage points | 88.4 % / 4.0 percentage points | +9.4 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 4.5 percentage points | 81.4 % / 1.7 percentage points | +0.2 percentage points / 4.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.3 % / 5.7 percentage points | 87.4 % / 3.2 percentage points | +2.0 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.6 % / 5.6 percentage points | 90.1 % / 10.0 percentage points | +1.5 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.9 % / 2.1 percentage points | 90.2 % / 3.3 percentage points | +6.3 percentage points / 3.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.1 % / 6.6 percentage points | 89.2 % / 3.1 percentage points | +8.1 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.6 % / 5.8 percentage points | 84.3 % / 7.6 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points / 12.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.9 % / 6.4 percentage points | 91.7 % / 4.9 percentage points | +8.8 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.6 % / 4.9 percentage points | 88.2 % / 3.7 percentage points | +3.6 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.3 % / 3.9 percentage points | 90.3 % / 3.9 percentage points | +6.0 percentage points / 4.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.2 % / 3.0 percentage points | 88.4 % / 3.1 percentage points | +1.2 percentage points / 3.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.8 % / 5.6 percentage points | 88.0 % / 5.6 percentage points | +3.2 percentage points / 8.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.5 % / 6.4 percentage points | 90.2 % / 6.5 percentage points | +4.7 percentage points / 3.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.3 % / 7.6 percentage points | 90.0 % / 3.5 percentage points | +9.7 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.0 % / 6.9 percentage points | 93.9 % / 3.3 percentage points | +12.0 percentage points / 7.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.6 % / 4.7 percentage points | 91.7 % / 3.5 percentage points | +5.1 percentage points / 6.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.0 % / 2.7 percentage points | 92.3 % / 4.6 percentage points | +8.3 percentage points / 2.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.9 % / 3.2 percentage points | 91.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 4.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.7 % / 2.7 percentage points | 88.6 % / 3.9 percentage points | +3.9 percentage points / 1.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.9 % / 5.3 percentage points | 90.6 % / 2.8 percentage points | +8.7 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.9 % / 4.2 percentage points | 91.5 % / 3.5 percentage points | +4.6 percentage points / 3.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.1 % / 4.5 percentage points | 89.6 % / 4.2 percentage points | +7.4 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.0 % / 7.5 percentage points | 93.1 % / 4.9 percentage points | +9.1 percentage points / 9.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.5 % / 3.1 percentage points | 85.4 % / 5.4 percentage points | +3.9 percentage points / 5.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 2.7 percentage points | 86.9 % / 5.7 percentage points | +3.8 percentage points / 3.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.4 % / 5.5 percentage points | 87.0 % / 4.2 percentage points | +4.6 percentage points / 4.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.9 % / 5.3 percentage points | 86.7 % / 4.6 percentage points | +4.8 percentage points / 9.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.6 % / 4.2 percentage points | 81.6 % / 7.9 percentage points | −0.9 percentage points / 7.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 4.9 percentage points | 83.9 % / 3.5 percentage points | +2.3 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.3 % / 7.1 percentage points | 86.7 % / 6.4 percentage points | +5.3 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.7 % / 8.3 percentage points | 88.3 % / 4.5 percentage points | +12.7 percentage points / 10.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.4 % / 7.1 percentage points | 86.5 % / 3.2 percentage points | +10.0 percentage points / 10.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.1 % / 3.5 percentage points | 79.5 % / 5.4 percentage points | −0.6 percentage points / 6.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 3.4 percentage points | 81.7 % / 7.6 percentage points | +2.2 percentage points / 8.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.8 % / 8.3 percentage points | 82.3 % / 4.1 percentage points | +0.4 percentage points / 9.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 2.4 percentage points | 87.8 % / 5.2 percentage points | +3.6 percentage points / 5.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.1 % / 6.6 percentage points | 88.8 % / 5.3 percentage points | +5.6 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 3.4 percentage points | 87.8 % / 3.9 percentage points | +3.7 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.6 % / 6.1 percentage points | 87.3 % / 5.6 percentage points | +1.7 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 90.2 % / 2.7 percentage points | 88.5 % / 4.6 percentage points | −1.7 percentage points / 5.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 89.7 % / 2.9 percentage points | 88.1 % / 4.4 percentage points | −1.7 percentage points / 4.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.8 % / 2.8 percentage points | 84.5 % / 5.6 percentage points | −2.2 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.7 % / 5.0 percentage points | 89.8 % / 5.5 percentage points | +5.1 percentage points / 6.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.3 % / 3.2 percentage points | 86.0 % / 7.7 percentage points | −0.3 percentage points / 8.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.1 % / 4.3 percentage points | 88.8 % / 3.8 percentage points | +4.7 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.5 % / 5.0 percentage points | 86.6 % / 6.4 percentage points | +4.0 percentage points / 5.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.3 % / 5.1 percentage points | 89.7 % / 6.7 percentage points | +8.4 percentage points / 8.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.1 % / 8.7 percentage points | 90.4 % / 3.6 percentage points | +8.3 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.0 % / 4.5 percentage points | 92.5 % / 4.4 percentage points | +5.5 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.0 % / 4.8 percentage points | 91.1 % / 3.0 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points / 6.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.8 % / 4.5 percentage points | 90.9 % / 5.3 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.5 % / 4.0 percentage points | 89.4 % / 4.6 percentage points | +4.0 percentage points / 3.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.6 % / 5.8 percentage points | 90.6 % / 2.9 percentage points | +6.0 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.8 % / 3.6 percentage points | 87.7 % / 5.5 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points / 7.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 2.4 percentage points | 90.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | +6.8 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.7 % / 6.1 percentage points | 92.0 % / 5.6 percentage points | +12.3 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.4 % / 3.4 percentage points | 90.4 % / 6.9 percentage points | +6.0 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.9 % / 7.1 percentage points | 89.9 % / 6.4 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 10.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.3 % / 3.0 percentage points | 85.1 % / 8.5 percentage points | −0.2 percentage points / 9.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.1 % / 6.4 percentage points | 88.1 % / 4.9 percentage points | +8.0 percentage points / 6.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.9 % / 4.2 percentage points | 83.8 % / 4.7 percentage points | +1.9 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.7 % / 5.0 percentage points | 85.3 % / 7.7 percentage points | +5.6 percentage points / 10.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.6 % / 2.9 percentage points | 85.5 % / 4.1 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 8.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.4 % / 5.9 percentage points | 85.6 % / 4.5 percentage points | +2.2 percentage points / 2.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 3.3 percentage points | 87.3 % / 3.5 percentage points | +6.0 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.0 % / 8.2 percentage points | 87.1 % / 8.5 percentage points | +2.0 percentage points / 11.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.1 % / 6.4 percentage points | 88.0 % / 4.6 percentage points | +13.9 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.4 % / 6.3 percentage points | 92.1 % / 3.3 percentage points | +12.7 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.6 % / 5.4 percentage points | 80.8 % / 5.6 percentage points | +5.2 percentage points / 8.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.9 % / 9.5 percentage points | 83.9 % / 8.3 percentage points | +8.0 percentage points / 13.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.5 % / 10.3 percentage points | 91.4 % / 4.8 percentage points | +20.9 percentage points / 12.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.6 % / 8.6 percentage points | 87.6 % / 8.7 percentage points | +9.0 percentage points / 5.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.1 % / 5.9 percentage points | 84.2 % / 13.6 percentage points | −1.9 percentage points / 17.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 10.7 percentage points | 82.6 % / 13.6 percentage points | +1.4 percentage points / 18.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.5 % / 6.3 percentage points | 87.1 % / 16.9 percentage points | +8.6 percentage points / 19.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.6 % / 5.1 percentage points | 88.2 % / 4.0 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.5 % / 9.1 percentage points | 85.2 % / 7.5 percentage points | +8.7 percentage points / 15.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.9 % / 3.4 percentage points | 86.2 % / 6.6 percentage points | +7.2 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.6 % / 4.1 percentage points | 84.6 % / 4.3 percentage points | −0.0 percentage points / 3.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.6 % / 7.3 percentage points | 91.6 % / 2.8 percentage points | +14.0 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.2 % / 6.1 percentage points | 89.6 % / 5.5 percentage points | +4.5 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.3 % / 3.3 percentage points | 87.2 % / 10.0 percentage points | +9.0 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 5.7 percentage points | 83.0 % / 8.9 percentage points | +2.5 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.8 % / 8.2 percentage points | 87.1 % / 8.2 percentage points | +6.3 percentage points / 8.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.5 % / 12.0 percentage points | 86.1 % / 12.3 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 6.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | 93.0 % / 2.9 percentage points | +12.1 percentage points / 5.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.7 % / 8.1 percentage points | 95.0 % / 3.0 percentage points | +20.3 percentage points / 10.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.3 % / 4.7 percentage points | 85.6 % / 2.2 percentage points | +4.2 percentage points / 5.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.2 % / 7.1 percentage points | 90.3 % / 2.5 percentage points | +13.1 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.5 % / 13.9 percentage points | 87.5 % / 7.7 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 13.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 10.8 percentage points | 88.8 % / 6.7 percentage points | +7.1 percentage points / 9.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.5 % / 7.6 percentage points | 92.9 % / 3.2 percentage points | +7.4 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.0 % / 9.2 percentage points | 91.5 % / 3.2 percentage points | +9.5 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 5.2 percentage points | 86.2 % / 8.5 percentage points | +4.8 percentage points / 8.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.8 % / 4.4 percentage points | 92.0 % / 6.7 percentage points | +11.3 percentage points / 9.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.9 % / 5.0 percentage points | 90.5 % / 4.1 percentage points | +8.6 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.3 % / 8.5 percentage points | 82.6 % / 6.8 percentage points | +3.3 percentage points / 7.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.8 % / 5.1 percentage points | 85.4 % / 7.4 percentage points | +6.6 percentage points / 7.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.1 % / 3.5 percentage points | 83.3 % / 6.9 percentage points | +4.2 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.4 % / 3.8 percentage points | 80.3 % / 3.2 percentage points | −0.1 percentage points / 5.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.5 % / 13.5 percentage points | 83.2 % / 6.1 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 20.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.7 % / 9.6 percentage points | 81.2 % / 8.9 percentage points | +6.5 percentage points / 15.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.1 % / 8.4 percentage points | 84.2 % / 4.8 percentage points | +2.1 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 4.6 percentage points | 89.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | +6.0 percentage points / 5.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.6 % / 5.9 percentage points | 82.7 % / 9.9 percentage points | +2.1 percentage points / 13.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 6.5 percentage points | 89.1 % / 6.1 percentage points | +9.5 percentage points / 12.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.6 % / 8.0 percentage points | 85.2 % / 7.2 percentage points | +9.6 percentage points / 7.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.8 % / 6.6 percentage points | 81.0 % / 6.1 percentage points | +3.2 percentage points / 8.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.9 % / 6.7 percentage points | 83.9 % / 5.6 percentage points | +12.0 percentage points / 10.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.6 % / 9.5 percentage points | 86.8 % / 5.9 percentage points | +14.2 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 67.9 % / 9.7 percentage points | 77.9 % / 16.2 percentage points | +10.0 percentage points / 17.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.0 % / 6.0 percentage points | 83.3 % / 9.2 percentage points | +6.3 percentage points / 13.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.3 % / 5.9 percentage points | 81.9 % / 5.6 percentage points | −1.4 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.3 % / 4.5 percentage points | 87.8 % / 6.5 percentage points | +11.5 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.5 % / 7.9 percentage points | 82.6 % / 5.0 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 8.7 percentage points | 91.2 % / 3.4 percentage points | +10.7 percentage points / 11.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.2 % / 7.8 percentage points | 89.7 % / 7.1 percentage points | +10.5 percentage points / 10.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.3 % / 5.7 percentage points | 88.7 % / 4.7 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 11.1 percentage points | 86.3 % / 7.1 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 10.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 5.8 percentage points | 91.6 % / 4.3 percentage points | +14.8 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 10.4 percentage points | 92.9 % / 2.8 percentage points | +11.7 percentage points / 8.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 8.3 percentage points | 93.2 % / 5.1 percentage points | +13.7 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.1 % / 5.3 percentage points | 81.6 % / 9.1 percentage points | +2.4 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.6 % / 11.5 percentage points | 89.1 % / 3.6 percentage points | +9.5 percentage points / 15.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 4.0 percentage points | 87.0 % / 5.3 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 5.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.6 % / 7.9 percentage points | 92.5 % / 2.9 percentage points | +13.9 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 7.9 percentage points | 94.0 % / 3.1 percentage points | +17.2 percentage points / 7.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.3 % / 8.9 percentage points | 87.6 % / 7.7 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 8.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.9 % / 7.8 percentage points | 90.8 % / 5.8 percentage points | +8.9 percentage points / 12.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.9 % / 6.9 percentage points | 91.7 % / 7.6 percentage points | +13.8 percentage points / 15.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.0 % / 7.0 percentage points | 90.7 % / 5.1 percentage points | +9.7 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.9 % / 7.4 percentage points | 84.8 % / 5.3 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.1 % / 5.3 percentage points | 88.0 % / 8.9 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 12.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.6 % / 5.8 percentage points | 89.8 % / 6.3 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.9 % / 5.1 percentage points | 87.8 % / 6.9 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 5.9 percentage points | 85.0 % / 6.8 percentage points | +4.6 percentage points / 4.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.1 % / 9.1 percentage points | 80.8 % / 11.7 percentage points | +1.7 percentage points / 16.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 5.8 percentage points | 82.4 % / 10.9 percentage points | +1.9 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.7 % / 7.2 percentage points | 84.1 % / 7.0 percentage points | +2.3 percentage points / 12.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.2 % / 7.1 percentage points | 86.7 % / 6.7 percentage points | +16.5 percentage points / 14.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.3 % / 6.7 percentage points | 88.0 % / 5.7 percentage points | +13.7 percentage points / 9.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.8 % / 5.2 percentage points | 81.3 % / 8.1 percentage points | −2.5 percentage points / 10.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.2 % / 9.0 percentage points | 86.9 % / 3.6 percentage points | +13.7 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.2 % / 8.8 percentage points | 84.7 % / 5.3 percentage points | +6.5 percentage points / 5.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.5 % / 3.9 percentage points | 82.3 % / 11.5 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 10.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 2.8 percentage points | 84.7 % / 6.7 percentage points | +3.3 percentage points / 7.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.4 % / 2.6 percentage points | 75.5 % / 10.6 percentage points | −9.0 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.9 % / 6.3 percentage points | 87.8 % / 9.6 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points / 13.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 4.4 percentage points | 84.6 % / 5.3 percentage points | +0.4 percentage points / 10.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 6.3 percentage points | 82.3 % / 11.8 percentage points | +2.8 percentage points / 14.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.9 % / 7.6 percentage points | 85.6 % / 8.5 percentage points | +8.7 percentage points / 13.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.3 % / 5.5 percentage points | 85.0 % / 8.0 percentage points | +10.7 percentage points / 10.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.6 % / 9.3 percentage points | 80.2 % / 9.0 percentage points | +2.7 percentage points / 12.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.8 % / 6.1 percentage points | 77.6 % / 5.9 percentage points | −1.2 percentage points / 7.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.1 % / 9.7 percentage points | 82.8 % / 8.6 percentage points | +6.7 percentage points / 15.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 6.6 percentage points | 89.0 % / 3.9 percentage points | +12.2 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 4.7 percentage points | 87.2 % / 5.8 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.6 % / 4.5 percentage points | 89.0 % / 10.0 percentage points | +5.5 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 6.3 percentage points | 87.6 % / 3.0 percentage points | +6.4 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.0 % / 5.0 percentage points | 87.8 % / 5.8 percentage points | +3.9 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.8 % / 5.3 percentage points | 85.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | +3.1 percentage points / 7.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.2 % / 4.5 percentage points | 89.5 % / 4.8 percentage points | +9.3 percentage points / 6.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.0 % / 7.1 percentage points | 88.3 % / 5.6 percentage points | +7.3 percentage points / 7.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.3 % / 7.9 percentage points | 91.0 % / 3.2 percentage points | +11.7 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.9 % / 4.8 percentage points | 90.6 % / 4.6 percentage points | +3.7 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.0 % / 10.3 percentage points | 93.2 % / 4.6 percentage points | +13.3 percentage points / 6.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.1 % / 6.9 percentage points | 92.8 % / 2.8 percentage points | +14.7 percentage points / 9.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.2 % / 4.8 percentage points | 88.9 % / 3.7 percentage points | +9.7 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.8 % / 4.8 percentage points | 90.1 % / 4.0 percentage points | +12.3 percentage points / 6.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.3 % / 3.6 percentage points | 88.4 % / 6.0 percentage points | +12.1 percentage points / 6.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.3 % / 7.7 percentage points | 89.4 % / 6.3 percentage points | +8.1 percentage points / 12.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.0 % / 2.6 percentage points | 90.9 % / 5.9 percentage points | +3.9 percentage points / 6.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.4 % / 7.6 percentage points | 92.4 % / 2.6 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points / 8.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.8 % / 5.2 percentage points | 92.2 % / 4.9 percentage points | +9.4 percentage points / 5.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.3 % / 8.0 percentage points | 87.6 % / 5.8 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 12.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.9 % / 5.6 percentage points | 86.8 % / 6.2 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.8 % / 8.2 percentage points | 87.6 % / 4.5 percentage points | +1.9 percentage points / 9.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.6 % / 5.9 percentage points | 85.0 % / 7.1 percentage points | −0.6 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.5 % / 7.5 percentage points | 89.5 % / 7.7 percentage points | +2.0 percentage points / 5.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.4 % / 3.7 percentage points | 88.5 % / 6.6 percentage points | +5.1 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.8 % / 3.1 percentage points | 78.5 % / 19.2 percentage points | −7.2 percentage points / 21.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.1 % / 6.4 percentage points | 87.7 % / 5.4 percentage points | +6.7 percentage points / 11.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.3 % / 5.2 percentage points | 78.6 % / 9.1 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 5.7 percentage points | 86.1 % / 5.9 percentage points | +5.6 percentage points / 5.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.1 % / 5.5 percentage points | 85.7 % / 6.7 percentage points | +14.7 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.7 % / 9.0 percentage points | 87.1 % / 3.9 percentage points | +8.4 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.9 % / 6.1 percentage points | 89.9 % / 3.7 percentage points | +8.1 percentage points / 7.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.8 % / 7.6 percentage points | 82.7 % / 4.8 percentage points | +1.9 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.1 % / 10.0 percentage points | 90.9 % / 7.1 percentage points | +15.8 percentage points / 13.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 7.6 percentage points | 89.4 % / 6.3 percentage points | +9.0 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.4 % / 5.7 percentage points | 82.5 % / 6.8 percentage points | +2.0 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.4 % / 10.7 percentage points | 84.0 % / 11.5 percentage points | +8.7 percentage points / 9.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.2 % / 3.5 percentage points | 87.7 % / 5.1 percentage points | +7.5 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.0 % / 6.5 percentage points | 86.9 % / 4.7 percentage points | +11.9 percentage points / 7.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 5.3 percentage points | 83.1 % / 11.2 percentage points | +1.7 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.5 % / 11.4 percentage points | 89.8 % / 4.5 percentage points | +16.4 percentage points / 12.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.4 % / 8.1 percentage points | 88.1 % / 10.4 percentage points | +14.7 percentage points / 13.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.0 % / 5.4 percentage points | 83.2 % / 6.9 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.2 % / 5.1 percentage points | 87.9 % / 11.3 percentage points | +14.6 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.7 % / 6.2 percentage points | 76.2 % / 8.5 percentage points | −0.4 percentage points / 10.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.4 % / 7.0 percentage points | 73.2 % / 6.4 percentage points | −4.2 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.1 % / 8.6 percentage points | 86.6 % / 5.0 percentage points | +7.5 percentage points / 13.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.2 % / 2.5 percentage points | 92.8 % / 6.5 percentage points | +6.6 percentage points / 9.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 89.9 % / 6.6 percentage points | 86.0 % / 5.2 percentage points | −3.9 percentage points / 12.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.4 % / 4.2 percentage points | 86.6 % / 6.7 percentage points | −1.8 percentage points / 7.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 4.9 percentage points | 87.3 % / 6.6 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 11.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.8 % / 4.1 percentage points | 85.7 % / 6.5 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points / 3.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.2 % / 7.5 percentage points | 86.0 % / 2.8 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.6 % / 7.9 percentage points | 86.4 % / 5.4 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 10.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.0 % / 5.5 percentage points | 90.7 % / 3.3 percentage points | +6.7 percentage points / 6.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.2 % / 11.7 percentage points | 91.7 % / 3.6 percentage points | +10.5 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.7 % / 3.5 percentage points | 89.9 % / 3.7 percentage points | +5.3 percentage points / 7.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.7 % / 6.4 percentage points | 91.6 % / 5.0 percentage points | +16.8 percentage points / 7.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.3 % / 5.1 percentage points | 87.7 % / 3.9 percentage points | +3.4 percentage points / 4.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.3 % / 4.1 percentage points | 90.3 % / 2.9 percentage points | +13.0 percentage points / 6.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.9 % / 9.3 percentage points | 92.1 % / 2.5 percentage points | +17.2 percentage points / 12.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 4.9 percentage points | 84.5 % / 6.1 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 9.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.6 % / 2.3 percentage points | 93.3 % / 3.5 percentage points | +14.7 percentage points / 6.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.9 % / 8.2 percentage points | 81.8 % / 8.1 percentage points | −1.1 percentage points / 11.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.4 % / 4.2 percentage points | 86.6 % / 6.1 percentage points | +10.1 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 10.8 percentage points | 92.3 % / 4.9 percentage points | +15.5 percentage points / 13.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.0 % / 4.9 percentage points | 82.9 % / 12.9 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points / 14.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.3 % / 5.9 percentage points | 89.5 % / 3.5 percentage points | +12.2 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.8 % / 7.3 percentage points | 88.6 % / 4.8 percentage points | +4.9 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.7 % / 5.5 percentage points | 88.1 % / 4.9 percentage points | +7.4 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.3 % / 3.8 percentage points | 82.8 % / 9.0 percentage points | +1.5 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.2 % / 9.5 percentage points | 90.3 % / 7.5 percentage points | +13.0 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | 80.6 % / 9.3 percentage points | −2.6 percentage points / 15.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 7.0 percentage points | 82.2 % / 7.7 percentage points | +2.8 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.6 % / 6.3 percentage points | 80.3 % / 11.0 percentage points | +4.8 percentage points / 16.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.6 % / 4.7 percentage points | 81.6 % / 5.8 percentage points | +1.0 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.3 % / 9.8 percentage points | 80.3 % / 6.4 percentage points | +1.0 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.4 % / 5.6 percentage points | 81.9 % / 6.1 percentage points | +10.6 percentage points / 1.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.6 % / 6.5 percentage points | 82.4 % / 11.5 percentage points | +6.8 percentage points / 12.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.1 % / 14.7 percentage points | 86.7 % / 9.0 percentage points | +10.6 percentage points / 19.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.5 % / 5.6 percentage points | 86.1 % / 5.3 percentage points | +2.6 percentage points / 6.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.3 % / 7.1 percentage points | 88.0 % / 10.7 percentage points | +13.7 percentage points / 8.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 5.5 percentage points | 82.3 % / 8.0 percentage points | +0.7 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 5.7 percentage points | 76.9 % / 6.8 percentage points | −4.5 percentage points / 7.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.8 % / 8.3 percentage points | 86.1 % / 7.8 percentage points | +10.4 percentage points / 13.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.0 % / 11.5 percentage points | 84.5 % / 8.4 percentage points | +8.5 percentage points / 10.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.3 % / 6.8 percentage points | 82.2 % / 15.5 percentage points | +7.0 percentage points / 17.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.7 % / 8.1 percentage points | 85.2 % / 5.5 percentage points | +8.5 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.7 % / 5.1 percentage points | 80.2 % / 8.6 percentage points | +2.4 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.6 % / 6.0 percentage points | 82.1 % / 7.0 percentage points | +2.5 percentage points / 5.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.0 % / 8.5 percentage points | 85.5 % / 6.6 percentage points | +7.5 percentage points / 13.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.8 % / 8.7 percentage points | 87.7 % / 7.0 percentage points | +12.9 percentage points / 11.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.9 % / 6.4 percentage points | 81.5 % / 5.3 percentage points | +3.6 percentage points / 6.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.3 % / 6.0 percentage points | 78.5 % / 3.4 percentage points | +5.2 percentage points / 5.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 8.7 percentage points | 80.9 % / 6.3 percentage points | +0.4 percentage points / 11.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.0 % / 5.2 percentage points | 83.0 % / 15.0 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 19.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.6 % / 5.4 percentage points | 87.6 % / 5.3 percentage points | +7.0 percentage points / 10.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.3 % / 11.0 percentage points | 87.2 % / 12.5 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.6 % / 4.4 percentage points | 83.6 % / 3.6 percentage points | +4.0 percentage points / 5.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.2 % / 10.1 percentage points | 90.5 % / 5.3 percentage points | +12.3 percentage points / 14.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.0 % / 6.4 percentage points | 87.3 % / 6.9 percentage points | +5.3 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.5 % / 5.2 percentage points | 89.0 % / 7.5 percentage points | +10.5 percentage points / 10.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.6 % / 4.7 percentage points | 92.5 % / 3.9 percentage points | +13.9 percentage points / 6.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.3 % / 9.4 percentage points | 87.9 % / 3.2 percentage points | +9.6 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.7 % / 7.3 percentage points | 90.4 % / 8.2 percentage points | +9.7 percentage points / 3.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.4 % / 8.4 percentage points | 90.2 % / 7.6 percentage points | +13.8 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.7 % / 5.3 percentage points | 86.8 % / 6.0 percentage points | +7.2 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.7 % / 6.4 percentage points | 91.0 % / 4.6 percentage points | +5.3 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 6.5 percentage points | 85.5 % / 8.9 percentage points | +5.1 percentage points / 15.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.8 % / 7.1 percentage points | 87.0 % / 7.0 percentage points | +12.2 percentage points / 10.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.5 % / 6.2 percentage points | 92.1 % / 5.5 percentage points | +14.6 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.4 % / 10.7 percentage points | 89.7 % / 4.9 percentage points | +14.4 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.0 % / 6.2 percentage points | 83.9 % / 4.7 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.1 % / 8.4 percentage points | 90.9 % / 6.8 percentage points | +13.8 percentage points / 13.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.1 % / 11.7 percentage points | 87.5 % / 5.3 percentage points | +14.4 percentage points / 10.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.4 % / 8.9 percentage points | 87.8 % / 6.1 percentage points | +5.4 percentage points / 12.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.8 % / 5.5 percentage points | 86.5 % / 4.1 percentage points | +12.7 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.5 % / 4.6 percentage points | 87.6 % / 11.1 percentage points | +14.1 percentage points / 15.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.2 % / 10.7 percentage points | 86.1 % / 5.2 percentage points | +15.0 percentage points / 13.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.6 % / 8.9 percentage points | 91.3 % / 5.8 percentage points | +10.7 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.8 % / 4.8 percentage points | 77.6 % / 7.0 percentage points | −1.1 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.2 % / 7.5 percentage points | 86.2 % / 6.1 percentage points | +9.0 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.4 % / 10.6 percentage points | 77.3 % / 8.7 percentage points | +4.9 percentage points / 12.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.7 % / 3.6 percentage points | 76.8 % / 14.2 percentage points | −10.8 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.1 % / 8.4 percentage points | 89.1 % / 4.3 percentage points | +18.0 percentage points / 14.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.2 % / 7.3 percentage points | 82.3 % / 5.1 percentage points | +11.1 percentage points / 10.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.0 % / 7.5 percentage points | 82.0 % / 7.9 percentage points | +5.0 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.0 % / 7.8 percentage points | 79.1 % / 9.5 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points / 13.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.6 % / 8.2 percentage points | 86.3 % / 5.9 percentage points | +7.7 percentage points / 13.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.9 % / 5.8 percentage points | 89.3 % / 6.6 percentage points | +8.3 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.3 % / 3.0 percentage points | 86.7 % / 6.7 percentage points | +5.4 percentage points / 9.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.0 % / 3.1 percentage points | 93.0 % / 7.7 percentage points | +6.0 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.9 % / 5.9 percentage points | 78.9 % / 10.4 percentage points | −2.0 percentage points / 15.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.3 % / 8.5 percentage points | 87.5 % / 4.7 percentage points | +7.1 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.4 % / 8.8 percentage points | 82.6 % / 6.3 percentage points | +3.1 percentage points / 8.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.9 % / 7.1 percentage points | 76.9 % / 8.5 percentage points | +3.0 percentage points / 12.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.1 % / 6.6 percentage points | 80.6 % / 7.1 percentage points | −2.5 percentage points / 14.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.9 % / 9.2 percentage points | 85.1 % / 8.5 percentage points | +13.2 percentage points / 9.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.2 % / 6.8 percentage points | 88.1 % / 4.4 percentage points | +9.0 percentage points / 10.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.8 % / 6.5 percentage points | 82.3 % / 7.0 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.3 % / 4.0 percentage points | 83.8 % / 13.8 percentage points | +4.6 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.5 % / 2.8 percentage points | 81.6 % / 14.8 percentage points | +10.2 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.8 % / 8.5 percentage points | 78.7 % / 9.0 percentage points | +4.9 percentage points / 10.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.2 % / 11.7 percentage points | 86.0 % / 12.4 percentage points | +12.8 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.9 % / 8.7 percentage points | 74.2 % / 5.7 percentage points | +2.2 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.7 % / 7.4 percentage points | 84.8 % / 6.6 percentage points | +13.1 percentage points / 11.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.8 % / 4.0 percentage points | 83.8 % / 4.6 percentage points | +12.0 percentage points / 7.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.4 % / 4.3 percentage points | 79.9 % / 8.9 percentage points | +4.5 percentage points / 12.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.1 % / 4.4 percentage points | 80.9 % / 3.9 percentage points | +1.7 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.2 % / 5.7 percentage points | 74.5 % / 6.0 percentage points | −4.8 percentage points / 9.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.6 % / 12.5 percentage points | 82.0 % / 12.7 percentage points | +2.4 percentage points / 13.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.4 % / 6.0 percentage points | 89.5 % / 8.2 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.1 % / 6.0 percentage points | 83.6 % / 11.0 percentage points | −0.5 percentage points / 13.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.9 % / 12.1 percentage points | 85.4 % / 3.9 percentage points | +11.5 percentage points / 12.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 3.8 percentage points | 89.4 % / 6.9 percentage points | +8.9 percentage points / 7.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | 90.3 % / 4.6 percentage points | +13.2 percentage points / 10.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.6 % / 5.4 percentage points | 92.6 % / 2.5 percentage points | +10.0 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.1 % / 9.3 percentage points | 90.9 % / 4.2 percentage points | +13.9 percentage points / 10.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.5 % / 8.3 percentage points | 91.8 % / 3.9 percentage points | +14.3 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 6.4 percentage points | 91.7 % / 7.8 percentage points | +10.3 percentage points / 10.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.5 % / 4.1 percentage points | 88.0 % / 10.8 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 11.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.7 % / 9.3 percentage points | 87.3 % / 5.9 percentage points | +14.6 percentage points / 9.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.1 % / 7.9 percentage points | 87.2 % / 9.2 percentage points | +13.1 percentage points / 11.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.2 % / 10.5 percentage points | 90.1 % / 5.7 percentage points | +16.9 percentage points / 14.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.8 % / 7.9 percentage points | 91.2 % / 10.3 percentage points | +16.4 percentage points / 13.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.2 % / 15.1 percentage points | 86.9 % / 5.5 percentage points | +12.7 percentage points / 14.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.8 % / 4.5 percentage points | 89.5 % / 5.1 percentage points | +8.6 percentage points / 8.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.4 % / 6.6 percentage points | 85.9 % / 4.7 percentage points | +8.6 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.3 % / 9.1 percentage points | 90.7 % / 4.9 percentage points | +14.4 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.7 % / 7.2 percentage points | 89.5 % / 5.1 percentage points | +12.8 percentage points / 12.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.5 % / 10.1 percentage points | 80.2 % / 11.5 percentage points | +7.7 percentage points / 13.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.8 % / 5.5 percentage points | 83.7 % / 4.6 percentage points | +8.0 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.7 % / 8.4 percentage points | 77.1 % / 9.5 percentage points | +3.4 percentage points / 14.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.5 % / 6.9 percentage points | 84.5 % / 5.8 percentage points | +9.0 percentage points / 6.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.1 % / 5.9 percentage points | 80.5 % / 9.1 percentage points | −4.6 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.7 % / 6.4 percentage points | 85.5 % / 10.0 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 12.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.5 % / 8.2 percentage points | 79.0 % / 14.2 percentage points | +5.5 percentage points / 29.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.7 % / 5.2 percentage points | 79.2 % / 7.1 percentage points | +0.5 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.3 % / 4.6 percentage points | 86.2 % / 12.6 percentage points | +15.9 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.9 % / 11.8 percentage points | 84.6 % / 6.7 percentage points | +7.7 percentage points / 13.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 63.0 % / 9.3 percentage points | 87.3 % / 7.3 percentage points | +24.4 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.1 % / 6.7 percentage points | 88.4 % / 4.8 percentage points | +9.3 percentage points / 10.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.5 % / 4.4 percentage points | 81.6 % / 12.3 percentage points | +5.1 percentage points / 16.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.7 % / 6.3 percentage points | 85.9 % / 3.2 percentage points | +7.2 percentage points / 4.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.3 % / 9.1 percentage points | 92.5 % / 3.8 percentage points | +17.2 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.0 % / 5.4 percentage points | 82.6 % / 5.9 percentage points | +3.7 percentage points / 3.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.5 % / 9.7 percentage points | 84.3 % / 10.0 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 15.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.3 % / 7.8 percentage points | 81.8 % / 10.8 percentage points | +4.5 percentage points / 10.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.8 % / 4.1 percentage points | 81.7 % / 8.8 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.8 % / 7.9 percentage points | 83.6 % / 9.2 percentage points | +12.8 percentage points / 8.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 3.8 percentage points | 84.4 % / 9.4 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 11.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.5 % / 7.5 percentage points | 87.6 % / 6.5 percentage points | +15.1 percentage points / 11.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.7 % / 12.0 percentage points | 84.3 % / 9.8 percentage points | +5.7 percentage points / 19.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.3 % / 5.6 percentage points | 76.1 % / 9.7 percentage points | −1.2 percentage points / 7.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.7 % / 3.9 percentage points | 88.8 % / 5.8 percentage points | +16.1 percentage points / 7.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.7 % / 7.9 percentage points | 81.8 % / 10.0 percentage points | +10.1 percentage points / 16.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.2 % / 5.3 percentage points | 84.3 % / 8.3 percentage points | +15.1 percentage points / 13.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.9 % / 14.5 percentage points | 82.4 % / 8.7 percentage points | +5.5 percentage points / 17.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.8 % / 8.8 percentage points | 76.0 % / 8.7 percentage points | +3.2 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.2 % / 11.2 percentage points | 84.2 % / 7.1 percentage points | +14.9 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.6 % / 9.0 percentage points | 77.4 % / 4.7 percentage points | +3.8 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 6.6 percentage points | 77.9 % / 10.4 percentage points | +1.1 percentage points / 9.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.2 % / 9.1 percentage points | 79.2 % / 6.9 percentage points | +9.9 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.8 % / 9.9 percentage points | 77.0 % / 12.6 percentage points | −1.9 percentage points / 17.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.7 % / 13.9 percentage points | 87.8 % / 5.8 percentage points | +11.1 percentage points / 15.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.7 % / 14.1 percentage points | 84.5 % / 8.2 percentage points | +14.8 percentage points / 15.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.2 % / 7.1 percentage points | 81.0 % / 7.2 percentage points | +3.8 percentage points / 8.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.6 % / 3.9 percentage points | 82.7 % / 14.7 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points / 12.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.3 % / 7.7 percentage points | 86.2 % / 6.9 percentage points | −0.1 percentage points / 13.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 8.3 percentage points | 89.2 % / 6.4 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points / 9.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.4 % / 5.1 percentage points | 86.2 % / 3.1 percentage points | −2.3 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.0 % / 6.7 percentage points | 85.1 % / 7.3 percentage points | +3.1 percentage points / 8.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.0 % / 8.9 percentage points | 86.3 % / 9.1 percentage points | +8.2 percentage points / 9.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.8 % / 9.0 percentage points | 83.8 % / 8.0 percentage points | +8.1 percentage points / 12.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.1 % / 6.8 percentage points | 86.8 % / 10.1 percentage points | +10.6 percentage points / 5.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.9 % / 10.2 percentage points | 83.0 % / 4.3 percentage points | +5.0 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.3 % / 7.6 percentage points | 93.3 % / 5.8 percentage points | +24.0 percentage points / 4.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.3 % / 4.1 percentage points | 90.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | +17.9 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.9 % / 5.4 percentage points | 90.9 % / 4.3 percentage points | +18.0 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.9 % / 9.8 percentage points | 84.8 % / 12.3 percentage points | +9.9 percentage points / 17.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.8 % / 3.1 percentage points | 80.5 % / 12.6 percentage points | +2.8 percentage points / 10.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.4 % / 8.6 percentage points | 84.7 % / 8.9 percentage points | +11.4 percentage points / 9.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 4.5 percentage points | 89.6 % / 3.8 percentage points | +8.2 percentage points / 4.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.6 % / 9.8 percentage points | 92.6 % / 6.1 percentage points | +16.0 percentage points / 12.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.6 % / 8.6 percentage points | 90.7 % / 5.8 percentage points | +14.1 percentage points / 13.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.8 % / 6.6 percentage points | 87.5 % / 6.1 percentage points | +14.7 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.0 % / 8.5 percentage points | 88.4 % / 4.7 percentage points | +9.4 percentage points / 13.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.0 % / 5.8 percentage points | 90.5 % / 4.9 percentage points | +13.5 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.2 % / 8.1 percentage points | 86.5 % / 5.7 percentage points | +12.3 percentage points / 10.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.5 % / 8.0 percentage points | 79.4 % / 6.7 percentage points | +2.9 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.3 % / 8.2 percentage points | 81.2 % / 5.9 percentage points | +5.9 percentage points / 11.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.8 % / 10.5 percentage points | 77.6 % / 9.1 percentage points | −2.2 percentage points / 15.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.3 % / 7.4 percentage points | 78.8 % / 7.3 percentage points | +5.4 percentage points / 14.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.9 % / 11.0 percentage points | 84.8 % / 6.7 percentage points | +13.8 percentage points / 8.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.5 % / 9.6 percentage points | 84.2 % / 8.4 percentage points | +10.7 percentage points / 13.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.5 % / 8.9 percentage points | 89.7 % / 4.7 percentage points | +19.3 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.4 % / 3.6 percentage points | 87.7 % / 7.3 percentage points | +8.3 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.5 % / 7.9 percentage points | 79.9 % / 9.1 percentage points | +5.4 percentage points / 10.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.6 % / 1.9 percentage points | 84.3 % / 8.7 percentage points | +6.7 percentage points / 8.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.7 % / 5.1 percentage points | 87.4 % / 11.6 percentage points | +16.7 percentage points / 6.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.4 % / 6.1 percentage points | 83.1 % / 4.8 percentage points | +10.6 percentage points / 5.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.6 % / 6.4 percentage points | 84.7 % / 6.2 percentage points | +2.1 percentage points / 4.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.6 % / 7.3 percentage points | 88.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | +10.5 percentage points / 9.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.7 % / 7.8 percentage points | 80.2 % / 7.5 percentage points | +2.5 percentage points / 5.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.9 % / 11.1 percentage points | 94.1 % / 3.8 percentage points | +15.2 percentage points / 15.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 64.3 % / 11.8 percentage points | 79.1 % / 7.5 percentage points | +14.8 percentage points / 18.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.1 % / 10.3 percentage points | 80.1 % / 14.9 percentage points | +7.0 percentage points / 19.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.4 % / 7.4 percentage points | 87.4 % / 11.9 percentage points | +7.0 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 68.2 % / 6.6 percentage points | 77.6 % / 6.9 percentage points | +9.3 percentage points / 10.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.7 % / 5.4 percentage points | 76.4 % / 27.4 percentage points | +5.7 percentage points / 22.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.7 % / 8.9 percentage points | 81.6 % / 13.8 percentage points | +5.9 percentage points / 17.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 12.0 percentage points | 84.6 % / 9.2 percentage points | +7.8 percentage points / 18.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.9 % / 8.1 percentage points | 86.7 % / 8.1 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 6.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.4 % / 10.7 percentage points | 91.6 % / 10.0 percentage points | +16.3 percentage points / 18.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.3 % / 3.4 percentage points | 79.7 % / 13.3 percentage points | +2.3 percentage points / 13.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.7 % / 8.5 percentage points | 80.0 % / 10.6 percentage points | +3.3 percentage points / 12.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.5 % / 7.8 percentage points | 86.9 % / 6.0 percentage points | +14.3 percentage points / 12.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.4 % / 12.4 percentage points | 87.2 % / 6.7 percentage points | +13.8 percentage points / 8.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 68.5 % / 15.8 percentage points | 82.5 % / 17.7 percentage points | +14.0 percentage points / 19.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.2 % / 14.9 percentage points | 74.9 % / 12.9 percentage points | +2.7 percentage points / 11.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.1 % / 5.1 percentage points | 79.3 % / 10.9 percentage points | +0.2 percentage points / 15.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 72.8 % / 9.8 percentage points | 82.5 % / 11.8 percentage points | +9.8 percentage points / 22.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.5 % / 11.4 percentage points | 86.5 % / 7.0 percentage points | +9.0 percentage points / 10.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.2 % / 12.6 percentage points | 81.2 % / 14.8 percentage points | +5.0 percentage points / 17.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.5 % / 4.9 percentage points | 79.2 % / 9.3 percentage points | +1.7 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.1 % / 6.0 percentage points | 87.2 % / 7.5 percentage points | +0.1 percentage points / 12.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 88.3 % / 6.7 percentage points | 86.7 % / 6.2 percentage points | −1.6 percentage points / 13.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.9 % / 6.4 percentage points | 91.4 % / 7.2 percentage points | +6.5 percentage points / 7.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.5 % / 7.5 percentage points | 82.0 % / 7.0 percentage points | −1.4 percentage points / 8.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | 83.8 % / 6.5 percentage points | −1.3 percentage points / 6.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.2 % / 4.2 percentage points | 94.3 % / 6.9 percentage points | +9.2 percentage points / 6.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.3 % / 7.4 percentage points | 91.8 % / 5.8 percentage points | +13.5 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.1 % / 11.1 percentage points | 94.2 % / 3.9 percentage points | +19.2 percentage points / 10.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.2 % / 6.7 percentage points | 89.1 % / 7.1 percentage points | +4.9 percentage points / 6.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.6 % / 8.5 percentage points | 84.2 % / 10.6 percentage points | +1.6 percentage points / 17.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.3 % / 10.9 percentage points | 87.1 % / 7.3 percentage points | +1.8 percentage points / 12.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.0 % / 8.0 percentage points | 84.0 % / 6.4 percentage points | +6.0 percentage points / 5.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.3 % / 12.3 percentage points | 84.4 % / 6.9 percentage points | +4.1 percentage points / 10.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.4 % / 4.2 percentage points | 93.0 % / 3.5 percentage points | +10.6 percentage points / 11.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.8 % / 7.1 percentage points | 94.7 % / 4.1 percentage points | +17.9 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.9 % / 4.5 percentage points | 89.7 % / 6.4 percentage points | +10.8 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.4 % / 6.1 percentage points | 92.8 % / 3.1 percentage points | +12.5 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.8 % / 7.6 percentage points | 91.6 % / 5.4 percentage points | +10.8 percentage points / 12.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.8 % / 4.2 percentage points | 87.1 % / 5.7 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 7.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.7 % / 8.6 percentage points | 84.0 % / 10.5 percentage points | +5.3 percentage points / 17.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.8 % / 9.8 percentage points | 86.5 % / 4.0 percentage points | +10.7 percentage points / 11.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.1 % / 5.2 percentage points | 81.5 % / 9.4 percentage points | −2.6 percentage points / 13.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.4 % / 6.6 percentage points | 84.9 % / 7.6 percentage points | +7.5 percentage points / 9.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.2 % / 8.0 percentage points | 81.2 % / 8.0 percentage points | +4.0 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.6 % / 7.2 percentage points | 77.1 % / 10.4 percentage points | −1.5 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 68.9 % / 7.5 percentage points | 85.4 % / 8.0 percentage points | +16.5 percentage points / 8.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.5 % / 6.6 percentage points | 90.3 % / 6.5 percentage points | +11.8 percentage points / 7.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.7 % / 8.3 percentage points | 93.6 % / 5.5 percentage points | +23.8 percentage points / 11.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.3 % / 10.9 percentage points | 87.1 % / 11.2 percentage points | +8.8 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.5 % / 11.7 percentage points | 88.4 % / 9.2 percentage points | +14.0 percentage points / 13.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 70.2 % / 15.5 percentage points | 89.6 % / 7.1 percentage points | +19.5 percentage points / 20.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.2 % / 5.3 percentage points | 96.0 % / 1.3 percentage points | +20.8 percentage points / 4.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.5 % / 5.2 percentage points | 88.7 % / 7.3 percentage points | +14.2 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.3 % / 7.8 percentage points | 82.9 % / 9.5 percentage points | +6.6 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.0 % / 5.5 percentage points | 86.7 % / 7.7 percentage points | +6.7 percentage points / 8.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.1 % / 9.1 percentage points | 85.6 % / 9.6 percentage points | +3.5 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 86.6 % / 5.6 percentage points | 87.7 % / 7.0 percentage points | +1.1 percentage points / 9.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.6 % / 14.5 percentage points | 89.1 % / 8.5 percentage points | +12.5 percentage points / 24.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.0 % / 10.8 percentage points | 79.4 % / 13.5 percentage points | +3.3 percentage points / 13.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.1 % / 7.9 percentage points | 84.8 % / 1.6 percentage points | +11.7 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 64.6 % / 14.8 percentage points | 84.6 % / 10.0 percentage points | +20.0 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 8.2 percentage points | 81.1 % / 17.4 percentage points | +1.6 percentage points / 20.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.8 % / 9.4 percentage points | 78.3 % / 10.8 percentage points | +2.5 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.1 % / 17.3 percentage points | 80.4 % / 8.5 percentage points | +11.3 percentage points / 22.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 69.1 % / 8.3 percentage points | 82.3 % / 9.9 percentage points | +13.2 percentage points / 6.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.5 % / 12.7 percentage points | 82.1 % / 11.0 percentage points | +5.6 percentage points / 21.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 7.0 percentage points | 85.4 % / 6.6 percentage points | +4.1 percentage points / 12.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.2 % / 17.3 percentage points | 85.4 % / 7.4 percentage points | +9.2 percentage points / 13.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.4 % / 4.7 percentage points | 81.7 % / 11.2 percentage points | −3.7 percentage points / 13.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 4.9 percentage points | 82.5 % / 9.3 percentage points | +1.0 percentage points / 8.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.5 % / 7.5 percentage points | 88.1 % / 8.9 percentage points | +13.6 percentage points / 14.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.1 % / 6.8 percentage points | 80.7 % / 13.1 percentage points | +0.6 percentage points / 11.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.6 % / 8.0 percentage points | 91.3 % / 7.5 percentage points | +14.7 percentage points / 11.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 5.0 percentage points | 89.0 % / 5.9 percentage points | +7.6 percentage points / 9.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.1 % / 5.4 percentage points | 76.2 % / 6.3 percentage points | −0.9 percentage points / 13.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.7 % / 10.9 percentage points | 82.0 % / 6.4 percentage points | +7.3 percentage points / 15.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.4 % / 8.6 percentage points | 90.8 % / 5.1 percentage points | +10.4 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.7 % / 13.2 percentage points | 85.0 % / 7.2 percentage points | +0.3 percentage points / 11.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.7 % / 6.9 percentage points | 93.0 % / 7.0 percentage points | +15.3 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.2 % / 3.5 percentage points | 84.8 % / 12.7 percentage points | +5.6 percentage points / 12.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 11.5 percentage points | 89.3 % / 11.5 percentage points | +9.8 percentage points / 9.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.4 % / 11.5 percentage points | 93.4 % / 2.3 percentage points | +16.0 percentage points / 11.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | 88.1 % / 6.2 percentage points | +5.2 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 91.3 % / 4.8 percentage points | 92.2 % / 3.6 percentage points | +0.9 percentage points / 11.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 3.4 percentage points | 94.9 % / 5.8 percentage points | +13.3 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.1 % / 3.8 percentage points | 92.9 % / 4.4 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 5.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.8 % / 5.6 percentage points | 92.2 % / 2.6 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 11.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 87.4 % / 3.8 percentage points | 91.8 % / 4.9 percentage points | +4.4 percentage points / 8.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.5 % / 6.0 percentage points | 91.4 % / 5.8 percentage points | +7.9 percentage points / 7.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.0 % / 7.2 percentage points | 93.0 % / 7.3 percentage points | +15.0 percentage points / 6.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.8 % / 6.4 percentage points | 92.9 % / 4.7 percentage points | +10.1 percentage points / 11.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.8 % / 2.9 percentage points | 91.5 % / 5.9 percentage points | +8.7 percentage points / 8.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.0 % / 8.8 percentage points | 89.7 % / 8.8 percentage points | +11.7 percentage points / 10.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.8 % / 4.6 percentage points | 94.2 % / 2.9 percentage points | +10.4 percentage points / 5.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.0 % / 5.4 percentage points | 92.4 % / 4.1 percentage points | +11.4 percentage points / 6.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.4 % / 6.1 percentage points | 93.8 % / 3.6 percentage points | +12.5 percentage points / 8.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.0 % / 5.3 percentage points | 90.9 % / 6.3 percentage points | +12.9 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.6 % / 7.1 percentage points | 94.2 % / 4.4 percentage points | +14.6 percentage points / 6.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 82.7 % / 7.6 percentage points | 88.2 % / 8.8 percentage points | +5.5 percentage points / 11.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.3 % / 5.5 percentage points | 86.3 % / 6.0 percentage points | +6.9 percentage points / 12.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.4 % / 5.9 percentage points | 84.7 % / 7.1 percentage points | +7.3 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.0 % / 6.2 percentage points | 89.4 % / 4.9 percentage points | +5.4 percentage points / 7.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 5.2 percentage points | 88.4 % / 6.9 percentage points | +8.9 percentage points / 4.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.6 % / 7.2 percentage points | 89.2 % / 8.8 percentage points | +7.5 percentage points / 12.6 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 85.6 % / 7.7 percentage points | 95.8 % / 5.2 percentage points | +10.1 percentage points / 11.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.7 % / 7.9 percentage points | 86.3 % / 10.8 percentage points | +6.7 percentage points / 15.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.6 % / 4.3 percentage points | 86.6 % / 8.0 percentage points | +8.9 percentage points / 10.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.9 % / 7.1 percentage points | 87.1 % / 7.5 percentage points | +9.2 percentage points / 4.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 71.5 % / 7.1 percentage points | 86.8 % / 6.0 percentage points | +15.3 percentage points / 5.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 73.5 % / 8.7 percentage points | 89.6 % / 9.1 percentage points | +16.1 percentage points / 12.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.4 % / 5.9 percentage points | 85.8 % / 7.2 percentage points | +7.4 percentage points / 9.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 64.6 % / 9.2 percentage points | 91.1 % / 7.7 percentage points | +26.5 percentage points / 12.1 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 67.3 % / 9.3 percentage points | 91.4 % / 8.7 percentage points | +24.1 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.5 % / 7.5 percentage points | 91.9 % / 5.4 percentage points | +16.4 percentage points / 13.8 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.0 % / 7.3 percentage points | 86.3 % / 3.6 percentage points | +6.3 percentage points / 5.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.6 % / 9.6 percentage points | 90.0 % / 6.0 percentage points | +15.4 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.8 % / 8.5 percentage points | 87.2 % / 9.6 percentage points | +7.4 percentage points / 11.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.9 % / 5.5 percentage points | 88.0 % / 4.2 percentage points | +9.1 percentage points / 10.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.1 % / 7.3 percentage points | 85.8 % / 7.5 percentage points | +4.7 percentage points / 9.9 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.5 % / 7.3 percentage points | 85.8 % / 7.7 percentage points | +6.4 percentage points / 10.4 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.9 % / 7.5 percentage points | 91.3 % / 8.2 percentage points | +6.4 percentage points / 10.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.0 % / 9.0 percentage points | 90.1 % / 16.2 percentage points | +9.1 percentage points / 21.3 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.9 % / 14.3 percentage points | 90.1 % / 5.7 percentage points | +13.1 percentage points / 18.2 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.3 % / 5.6 percentage points | 78.9 % / 10.9 percentage points | +2.6 percentage points / 9.7 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 63.6 % / 8.4 percentage points | 88.2 % / 7.5 percentage points | +24.6 percentage points / 11.5 percentage points | Valid / Valid / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| No counterpart | 88.2 % / 3.9 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 84.5 % / 2.2 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 64.7 % / 5.5 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 83.7 % / 4.4 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 84.2 % / 1.7 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 85.8 % / 3.1 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 88.8 % / 4.3 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 86.7 % / 2.6 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 83.8 % / 3.9 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 84.0 % / 3.5 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 88.3 % / 3.7 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 89.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 84.9 % / 4.8 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 85.4 % / 3.3 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 89.6 % / 3.8 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent | |
| No counterpart | 84.2 % / 2.8 percentage points | No contrast | Absent / Valid / Absent |
Map sample grid-00-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 1.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0,
0, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.2 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0,
0, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−9.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- A position
- (0,
0, 1.2) m - B position
- (0,
0, 1.2) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.1 %
- Input A u2
- 1.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-01-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.9888648950042302,
3.014789685766304, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.9888648950042302,
3.014789685766304, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- A position
- (3.9888648950042302,
3.014789685766304, 1.2) m - B position
- (3.9888648950042302,
3.014789685766304, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.6 %
- Input A u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.8 %
- Input B u2
- 2.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-01-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 2.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.6164520074388085,
4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 0.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.6164520074388085,
4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-0.6164520074388085,
4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - B position
- (-0.6164520074388085,
4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.5 %
- Input A u2
- 2.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.1 %
- Input B u2
- 0.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-01-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.4 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.605316902443039,
1.9470634884544602, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.605316902443039,
1.9470634884544602, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-4.605316902443039,
1.9470634884544602, 1.2) m - B position
- (-4.605316902443039,
1.9470634884544602, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.4 %
- Input A u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-01-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.988864895004231,
-3.0147896857663037, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.0 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.988864895004231,
-3.0147896857663037, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−3.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-3.988864895004231,
-3.0147896857663037, 1.2) m - B position
- (-3.988864895004231,
-3.0147896857663037, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-01-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.6164520074388068,
-4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
51.1 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.6164520074388068,
-4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−32.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- A position
- (0.6164520074388068,
-4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - B position
- (0.6164520074388068,
-4.961853174220764, 1.2) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 51.1 %
- Input B u2
- 2.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-01-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.605316902443038,
-1.947063488454463, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
74.7 %
- u2
- 1.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.605316902443038,
-1.947063488454463, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−10.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (4.605316902443038,
-1.947063488454463, 1.2) m - B position
- (4.605316902443038,
-1.947063488454463, 1.2) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.9 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 74.7 %
- Input B u2
- 1.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.934980143971647,
1.1384944175924308, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.5 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.934980143971647,
1.1384944175924308, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- A position
- (9.934980143971647,
1.1384944175924308, 1.2) m - B position
- (9.934980143971647,
1.1384944175924308, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.5 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.267903296127011,
5.625102228928119, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.7 %
- u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.267903296127011,
5.625102228928119, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- A position
- (8.267903296127011,
5.625102228928119, 1.2) m - B position
- (8.267903296127011,
5.625102228928119, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.7 %
- Input B u2
- 2.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 2.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.70674944217575,
8.823066909446979, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.70674944217575,
8.823066909446979, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 1.7 percentage points
- A position
- (4.70674944217575,
8.823066909446979, 1.2) m - B position
- (4.70674944217575,
8.823066909446979, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.8 %
- Input A u2
- 2.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.06733601350179425,
9.999773290494424, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.5 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.06733601350179425,
9.999773290494424, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- A position
- (0.06733601350179425,
9.999773290494424, 1.2) m - B position
- (0.06733601350179425,
9.999773290494424, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.8 %
- Input A u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.5 %
- Input B u2
- 2.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.5 %
- u2
- 1.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.587503284378492,
8.88565212102165, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.0 %
- u2
- 1.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.587503284378492,
8.88565212102165, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-4.587503284378492,
8.88565212102165, 1.2) m - B position
- (-4.587503284378492,
8.88565212102165, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.5 %
- Input A u2
- 1.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.0 %
- Input B u2
- 1.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.191400865215448,
5.735935134339265, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.191400865215448,
5.735935134339265, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-8.191400865215448,
5.735935134339265, 1.2) m - B position
- (-8.191400865215448,
5.735935134339265, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.2 %
- Input B u2
- 1.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.918747224913378,
1.272184533891663, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.7 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.918747224913378,
1.272184533891663, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−4.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.918747224913378,
1.272184533891663, 1.2) m - B position
- (-9.918747224913378,
1.272184533891663, 1.2) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.8 %
- Input A u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.7 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.373828129245762,
-3.483008211784879, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.373828129245762,
-3.483008211784879, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.373828129245762,
-3.483008211784879, 1.2) m - B position
- (-9.373828129245762,
-3.483008211784879, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.7 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.8 %
- Input B u2
- 2.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.681477976043054,
-7.440285750940728, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 0.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.681477976043054,
-7.440285750940728, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-6.681477976043054,
-7.440285750940728, 1.2) m - B position
- (-6.681477976043054,
-7.440285750940728, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.9 %
- Input B u2
- 0.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.458481739067307,
-9.693083489719491, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.458481739067307,
-9.693083489719491, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.458481739067307,
-9.693083489719491, 1.2) m - B position
- (-2.458481739067307,
-9.693083489719491, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.32772303641199,
-9.725312615322807, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.32772303641199,
-9.725312615322807, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- A position
- (2.32772303641199,
-9.725312615322807, 1.2) m - B position
- (2.32772303641199,
-9.725312615322807, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.1 %
- Input B u2
- 3.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.5 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.580674516352881,
-7.529589823478022, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.8 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.580674516352881,
-7.529589823478022, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−7.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- A position
- (6.580674516352881,
-7.529589823478022, 1.2) m - B position
- (6.580674516352881,
-7.529589823478022, 1.2) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.5 %
- Input A u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.8 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-02-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.326072770322364,
-3.608928744468605, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.1 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.326072770322364,
-3.608928744468605, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- A position
- (9.326072770322364,
-3.608928744468605, 1.2) m - B position
- (9.326072770322364,
-3.608928744468605, 1.2) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-04-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.577369967954851,
-1.1532323623009748, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 2.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.20508186729992,
-3.576294927534249, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.458261761071777,
-5.911266095205803, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-13.355305343198879,
-8.100630789631355, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 0.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.923380667286661,
-10.090460517883944, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.197758942354561,
-11.83174173795336, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.220945731420251,
-13.281583161695865, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
89.6 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.041633953272106,
-14.404272254253934, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.0 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.7135044771196766,
-15.172154906222522, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.2 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.293903853908721,
-15.566316610452205, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.1575682455397645,
-15.577048364722954, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.5805270913028284,
-15.204085824160773, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.7 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.915290292726823,
-14.456615812588085, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.104347896757927,
-13.353050032420136, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.093778974728455,
-11.9205715470916, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.83457980419318,
-10.194465207071088, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.28387093000329,
-8.217248512428812, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.405953372255473,
-6.037624320575205, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.173187964572126,
-3.709281196103045, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-04-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.566676162827457,
-1.2895709525495156, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
No counterpart in B: this sample exists only in A.
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in A. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-05-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.401214566057675,
-0.13321499119884267, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.401214566057675,
-0.13321499119884267, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.401214566057675,
-0.13321499119884267, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-18.401214566057675,
-0.13321499119884267, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.1 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.21050975659904,
-2.645709384037539, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.21050975659904,
-2.645709384037539, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−3.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.21050975659904,
-2.645709384037539, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-18.21050975659904,
-2.645709384037539, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.5 %
- Input A u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.678367269292938,
-5.108598088709404, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.8 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.678367269292938,
-5.108598088709404, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-17.678367269292938,
-5.108598088709404, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-17.678367269292938,
-5.108598088709404, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.814764501673988,
-7.475703210616217, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.814764501673988,
-7.475703210616217, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.814764501673988,
-7.475703210616217, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-16.814764501673988,
-7.475703210616217, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.0 %
- Input A u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.635893560800127,
-9.702642747999244, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.635893560800127,
-9.702642747999244, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-15.635893560800127,
-9.702642747999244, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-15.635893560800127,
-9.702642747999244, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.4 %
- Input A u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.4 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.163857669585697,
-11.747662731611412, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.163857669585697,
-11.747662731611412, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.163857669585697,
-11.747662731611412, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-14.163857669585697,
-11.747662731611412, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.426256742756985,
-13.572420090133512, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.426256742756985,
-13.572420090133512, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−3.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.426256742756985,
-13.572420090133512, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-12.426256742756985,
-13.572420090133512, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.455669902667609,
-15.14270156301127, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.8 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.455669902667609,
-15.14270156301127, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-10.455669902667609,
-15.14270156301127, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-10.455669902667609,
-15.14270156301127, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.1 %
- Input A u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.8 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.289044637535632,
-16.42906518146772, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.289044637535632,
-16.42906518146772, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-8.289044637535632,
-16.42906518146772, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-8.289044637535632,
-16.42906518146772, 3.8) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.9670040550708405,
-17.407392290252478, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.5 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.9670040550708405,
-17.407392290252478, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-5.9670040550708405,
-17.407392290252478, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-5.9670040550708405,
-17.407392290252478, 3.8) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.1 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.533085220129809,
-18.059339760004338, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.6 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.533085220129809,
-18.059339760004338, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-3.533085220129809,
-18.059339760004338, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-3.533085220129809,
-18.059339760004338, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.1 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.0329228571754439,
-18.372683911478415, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.5 %
- u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.0329228571754439,
-18.372683911478415, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-1.0329228571754439,
-18.372683911478415, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (-1.0329228571754439,
-18.372683911478415, 3.8) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.5 %
- Input B u2
- 2.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.4866062773006152,
-18.341549703235646, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.9 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.4866062773006152,
-18.341549703235646, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- A position
- (1.4866062773006152,
-18.341549703235646, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (1.4866062773006152,
-18.341549703235646, 3.8) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.9 %
- Input B u2
- 2.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.978262309816355,
-17.966520885643604, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.978262309816355,
-17.966520885643604, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- A position
- (3.978262309816355,
-17.966520885643604, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (3.978262309816355,
-17.966520885643604, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.1 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 1.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.395327973194318,
-17.254629055857777, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.395327973194318,
-17.254629055857777, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- A position
- (6.395327973194318,
-17.254629055857777, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (6.395327973194318,
-17.254629055857777, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.6 %
- Input A u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.5 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.692484531257469,
-16.219221818996832, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.692484531257469,
-16.219221818996832, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- A position
- (8.692484531257469,
-16.219221818996832, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (8.692484531257469,
-16.219221818996832, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.4 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.826661481789195,
-14.879712527421875, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.4 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.826661481789195,
-14.879712527421875, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- A position
- (10.826661481789195,
-14.879712527421875, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (10.826661481789195,
-14.879712527421875, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.757844106264612,
-13.261216290379346, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.8 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.757844106264612,
-13.261216290379346, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- A position
- (12.757844106264612,
-13.261216290379346, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (12.757844106264612,
-13.261216290379346, 3.8) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.8 %
- Input B u2
- 2.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.8 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.449823725211612,
-11.394079078639258, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.449823725211612,
-11.394079078639258, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- A position
- (14.449823725211612,
-11.394079078639258, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (14.449823725211612,
-11.394079078639258, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.0 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.87087659230018,
-9.313308753174216, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.87087659230018,
-9.313308753174216, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- A position
- (15.87087659230018,
-9.313308753174216, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (15.87087659230018,
-9.313308753174216, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
89.9 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.994358698245446,
-7.057918685798425, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.994358698245446,
-7.057918685798425, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- A position
- (16.994358698245446,
-7.057918685798425, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (16.994358698245446,
-7.057918685798425, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 89.9 %
- Input A u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.79920533225763,
-4.6701962785417095, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.3 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.79920533225763,
-4.6701962785417095, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- A position
- (17.79920533225763,
-4.6701962785417095, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (17.79920533225763,
-4.6701962785417095, 3.8) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.9 %
- Input A u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-05-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.270326034519105,
-2.1949100966432935, 2.0618116703484297) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.3 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.270326034519105,
-2.1949100966432935, 3.8) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−3.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- A position
- (18.270326034519105,
-2.1949100966432935, 2.0618116703484297) m - B position
- (18.270326034519105,
-2.1949100966432935, 3.8) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.3 %
- Input A u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.718000009708536,
-1.614972149222954, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.718000009708536,
-1.614972149222954, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-20.718000009708536,
-1.614972149222954, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-20.718000009708536,
-1.614972149222954, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.7 %
- Input A u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.36967972301373,
-4.113369352111728, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.36967972301373,
-4.113369352111728, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-20.36967972301373,
-4.113369352111728, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-20.36967972301373,
-4.113369352111728, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.2 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.721207522481443,
-6.551155111907361, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.721207522481443,
-6.551155111907361, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.721207522481443,
-6.551155111907361, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-19.721207522481443,
-6.551155111907361, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 2.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.782138795074406,
-8.892408094976838, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.6 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.782138795074406,
-8.892408094976838, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.782138795074406,
-8.892408094976838, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-18.782138795074406,
-8.892408094976838, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.0 %
- Input A u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.6 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.566310934388827,
-11.102629400345679, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.566310934388827,
-11.102629400345679, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-17.566310934388827,
-11.102629400345679, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-17.566310934388827,
-11.102629400345679, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.5 %
- Input A u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.09163944347847,
-13.149250908935329, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.09163944347847,
-13.149250908935329, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.09163944347847,
-13.149250908935329, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-16.09163944347847,
-13.149250908935329, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.8 %
- Input B u2
- 3.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.37985394579824,
-15.002115182285447, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.2 %
- u2
- 1.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.37985394579824,
-15.002115182285447, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.37985394579824,
-15.002115182285447, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-14.37985394579824,
-15.002115182285447, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.4 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.2 %
- Input B u2
- 1.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.45617799420683,
-16.633919839342926, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.45617799420683,
-16.633919839342926, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.45617799420683,
-16.633919839342926, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-12.45617799420683,
-16.633919839342926, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.1 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.7 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.348957396116276,
-18.02061986332376, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.6 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.348957396116276,
-18.02061986332376, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-10.348957396116276,
-18.02061986332376, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-10.348957396116276,
-18.02061986332376, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.089242531502842,
-19.141781910563452, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.089242531502842,
-19.141781910563452, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-8.089242531502842,
-19.141781910563452, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-8.089242531502842,
-19.141781910563452, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 1.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.710330818419432,
-19.98088540053363, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.3 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.710330818419432,
-19.98088540053363, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-5.710330818419432,
-19.98088540053363, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-5.710330818419432,
-19.98088540053363, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.247276067885252,
-20.525565950394363, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
96.0 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.247276067885252,
-20.525565950394363, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-3.247276067885252,
-20.525565950394363, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-3.247276067885252,
-20.525565950394363, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 85.0 %
- Input A u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 96.0 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.5 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.7363719579213654,
-20.76779756701793, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.6 %
- u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.7363719579213654,
-20.76779756701793, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-0.7363719579213654,
-20.76779756701793, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (-0.7363719579213654,
-20.76779756701793, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.6 %
- Input B u2
- 1.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.7853827621390825,
-20.70401091184279, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.2 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.7853827621390825,
-20.70401091184279, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- A position
- (1.7853827621390825,
-20.70401091184279, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (1.7853827621390825,
-20.70401091184279, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.2 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.1 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.280829456728563,
-20.335145895897913, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.7 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.280829456728563,
-20.335145895897913, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- A position
- (4.280829456728563,
-20.335145895897913, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (4.280829456728563,
-20.335145895897913, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.1 %
- Input A u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.7 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.713197145083241,
-19.666637829997654, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.713197145083241,
-19.666637829997654, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (6.713197145083241,
-19.666637829997654, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (6.713197145083241,
-19.666637829997654, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.046644330098413,
-18.708337334187313, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.046644330098413,
-18.708337334187313, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- A position
- (9.046644330098413,
-18.708337334187313, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (9.046644330098413,
-18.708337334187313, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.246787131028544,
-17.474365186592028, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.2 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.246787131028544,
-17.474365186592028, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- A position
- (11.246787131028544,
-17.474365186592028, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (11.246787131028544,
-17.474365186592028, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.9 %
- Input A u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.4 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.281205937875106,
-15.982904250504653, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.281205937875106,
-15.982904250504653, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- A position
- (13.281205937875106,
-15.982904250504653, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (13.281205937875106,
-15.982904250504653, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 8.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.119923121793384,
-14.255931545714802, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.119923121793384,
-14.255931545714802, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- A position
- (15.119923121793384,
-14.255931545714802, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (15.119923121793384,
-14.255931545714802, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.5 %
- Input A u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 2.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.735844762345597,
-12.31889441206954, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.735844762345597,
-12.31889441206954, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- A position
- (16.735844762345597,
-12.31889441206954, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (16.735844762345597,
-12.31889441206954, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.10515988264753,
-10.200335537070297, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.10515988264753,
-10.200335537070297, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- A position
- (18.10515988264753,
-10.200335537070297, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (18.10515988264753,
-10.200335537070297, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.4 %
- Input A u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.207691309587293,
-7.931472372810324, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.207691309587293,
-7.931472372810324, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (19.207691309587293,
-7.931472372810324, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (19.207691309587293,
-7.931472372810324, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.8 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.027192989109942,
-5.545737139641068, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.027192989109942,
-5.545737139641068, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- A position
- (20.027192989109942,
-5.545737139641068, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (20.027192989109942,
-5.545737139641068, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.551589375559058,
-3.0782841947189845, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.4 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.551589375559058,
-3.0782841947189845, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−4.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (20.551589375559058,
-3.0782841947189845, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (20.551589375559058,
-3.0782841947189845, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.9 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.4 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-06-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.0 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.77315336761826,
-0.5654720244706003, 3.3184058351742145) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.77315336761826,
-0.5654720244706003, 4.52756076475168) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- A position
- (20.77315336761826,
-0.5654720244706003, 3.3184058351742145) m - B position
- (20.77315336761826,
-0.5654720244706003, 4.52756076475168) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.152830628876707,
-0.5762238024837013, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.9 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.152830628876707,
-0.5762238024837013, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.152830628876707,
-0.5762238024837013, 4.575) m - B position
- (-23.152830628876707,
-0.5762238024837013, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.6 %
- Input A u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.95253086285692,
-3.093044938179957, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.95253086285692,
-3.093044938179957, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-22.95253086285692,
-3.093044938179957, 4.575) m - B position
- (-22.95253086285692,
-3.093044938179957, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.5 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.479458848739856,
-5.573107738758644, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.3 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.479458848739856,
-5.573107738758644, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−3.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-22.479458848739856,
-5.573107738758644, 4.575) m - B position
- (-22.479458848739856,
-5.573107738758644, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.5 %
- Input A u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.739236664438128,
-7.986938665568254, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.1 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.739236664438128,
-7.986938665568254, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.739236664438128,
-7.986938665568254, 4.575) m - B position
- (-21.739236664438128,
-7.986938665568254, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
89.4 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.740661251365726,
-10.305851292159057, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.2 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.740661251365726,
-10.305851292159057, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-20.740661251365726,
-10.305851292159057, 4.575) m - B position
- (-20.740661251365726,
-10.305851292159057, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 89.4 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.495599869910883,
-12.502287219238363, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.6 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.495599869910883,
-12.502287219238363, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.495599869910883,
-12.502287219238363, 4.575) m - B position
- (-19.495599869910883,
-12.502287219238363, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.018849066653495,
-14.550143583936235, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.0 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.018849066653495,
-14.550143583936235, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.018849066653495,
-14.550143583936235, 4.575) m - B position
- (-18.018849066653495,
-14.550143583936235, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.0 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.327958829387512,
-16.425083271199163, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.327958829387512,
-16.425083271199163, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.327958829387512,
-16.425083271199163, 4.575) m - B position
- (-16.327958829387512,
-16.425083271199163, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.2 %
- Input A u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.44302401972368,
-18.10482414070032, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.0 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.44302401972368,
-18.10482414070032, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.44302401972368,
-18.10482414070032, 4.575) m - B position
- (-14.44302401972368,
-18.10482414070032, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.8 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.0 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.386445561926964,
-19.56940383203893, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.4 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.386445561926964,
-19.56940383203893, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.386445561926964,
-19.56940383203893, 4.575) m - B position
- (-12.386445561926964,
-19.56940383203893, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.182664226066436,
-20.80141700123304, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.4 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.182664226066436,
-20.80141700123304, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-10.182664226066436,
-20.80141700123304, 4.575) m - B position
- (-10.182664226066436,
-20.80141700123304, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.857870169248894,
-21.786222169142327, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 2.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.857870169248894,
-21.786222169142327, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.857870169248894,
-21.786222169142327, 4.575) m - B position
- (-7.857870169248894,
-21.786222169142327, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 2.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.439691686803979,
-22.51211572359461, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.3 %
- u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.439691686803979,
-22.51211572359461, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-5.439691686803979,
-22.51211572359461, 4.575) m - B position
- (-5.439691686803979,
-22.51211572359461, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 85.1 %
- Input A u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.3 %
- Input B u2
- 1.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.3 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.956866872360584,
-22.970471007341942, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.6 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.956866872360584,
-22.970471007341942, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.956866872360584,
-22.970471007341942, 4.575) m - B position
- (-2.956866872360584,
-22.970471007341942, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.3 %
- Input A u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.4 %
- u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.43890208886900955,
-23.155840838898218, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.9 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.43890208886900955,
-23.155840838898218, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-0.43890208886900955,
-23.155840838898218, 4.575) m - B position
- (-0.43890208886900955,
-23.155840838898218, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.4 %
- Input A u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.0842786906358413,
-23.06602224788144, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.0 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.0842786906358413,
-23.06602224788144, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (2.0842786906358413,
-23.06602224788144, 4.575) m - B position
- (2.0842786906358413,
-23.06602224788144, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.5 %
- Input A u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.582689505229076,
-22.702082655533246, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.582689505229076,
-22.702082655533246, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- A position
- (4.582689505229076,
-22.702082655533246, 4.575) m - B position
- (4.582689505229076,
-22.702082655533246, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.1 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.026638764966234,
-22.06834718928162, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.3 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.026638764966234,
-22.06834718928162, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- A position
- (7.026638764966234,
-22.06834718928162, 4.575) m - B position
- (7.026638764966234,
-22.06834718928162, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.3 %
- Input B u2
- 2.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.387082111393024,
-21.172347282102788, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.387082111393024,
-21.172347282102788, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- A position
- (9.387082111393024,
-21.172347282102788, 4.575) m - B position
- (9.387082111393024,
-21.172347282102788, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.6 %
- Input A u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.63596758623268,
-20.02473116753737, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.7 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.63596758623268,
-20.02473116753737, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (11.63596758623268,
-20.02473116753737, 4.575) m - B position
- (11.63596758623268,
-20.02473116753737, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.746569006200627,
-18.639137334055043, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.746569006200627,
-18.639137334055043, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- A position
- (13.746569006200627,
-18.639137334055043, 4.575) m - B position
- (13.746569006200627,
-18.639137334055043, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.0 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.693803582056674,
-17.032032442660075, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.1 %
- u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.693803582056674,
-17.032032442660075, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- A position
- (15.693803582056674,
-17.032032442660075, 4.575) m - B position
- (15.693803582056674,
-17.032032442660075, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.5 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.1 %
- Input B u2
- 2.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.2 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.45453000724939,
-15.222515633955869, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.45453000724939,
-15.222515633955869, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- A position
- (17.45453000724939,
-15.222515633955869, 4.575) m - B position
- (17.45453000724939,
-15.222515633955869, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.2 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.00782347361038,
-13.232091550320618, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.9 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.00782347361038,
-13.232091550320618, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (19.00782347361038,
-13.232091550320618, 4.575) m - B position
- (19.00782347361038,
-13.232091550320618, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.33522434575976,
-11.084414770641692, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.6 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.33522434575976,
-11.084414770641692, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- A position
- (20.33522434575976,
-11.084414770641692, 4.575) m - B position
- (20.33522434575976,
-11.084414770641692, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.7 %
- Input A u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.6 %
- Input B u2
- 2.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.420957538928615,
-8.805008694795106, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.420957538928615,
-8.805008694795106, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (21.420957538928615,
-8.805008694795106, 4.575) m - B position
- (21.420957538928615,
-8.805008694795106, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.0 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.7 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.252119993070806,
-6.420962218700458, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.4 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.252119993070806,
-6.420962218700458, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- A position
- (22.252119993070806,
-6.420962218700458, 4.575) m - B position
- (22.252119993070806,
-6.420962218700458, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.7 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.7 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.818834015285915,
-3.96060780472272, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.818834015285915,
-3.96060780472272, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- A position
- (22.818834015285915,
-3.96060780472272, 4.575) m - B position
- (22.818834015285915,
-3.96060780472272, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.7 %
- Input A u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-07-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.3 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.11436466820293,
-1.4531847732935563, 4.575) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.11436466820293,
-1.4531847732935563, 5.784154929577466) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- A position
- (23.11436466820293,
-1.4531847732935563, 4.575) m - B position
- (23.11436466820293,
-1.4531847732935563, 5.784154929577466) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.455946405057166,
-2.0598684491211707, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.9 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.455946405057166,
-2.0598684491211707, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.455946405057166,
-2.0598684491211707, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-25.455946405057166,
-2.0598684491211707, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.127848002297533,
-4.565032330472552, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.3 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.127848002297533,
-4.565032330472552, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.127848002297533,
-4.565032330472552, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-25.127848002297533,
-4.565032330472552, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.3 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.0 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.553825629475455,
-7.025518654316, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.553825629475455,
-7.025518654316, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-24.553825629475455,
-7.025518654316, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-24.553825629475455,
-7.025518654316, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.739497191507265,
-9.417246864091776, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 1.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.739497191507265,
-9.417246864091776, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.739497191507265,
-9.417246864091776, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-23.739497191507265,
-9.417246864091776, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.4 %
- Input B u2
- 1.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.3 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.692832446980397,
-11.716809332668232, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.4 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.692832446980397,
-11.716809332668232, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-22.692832446980397,
-11.716809332668232, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-22.692832446980397,
-11.716809332668232, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.6 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.42407500884869,
-13.9017004506662, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.1 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.42407500884869,
-13.9017004506662, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.42407500884869,
-13.9017004506662, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-21.42407500884869,
-13.9017004506662, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.1 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.945642091121197,
-15.95053688681739, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.2 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.945642091121197,
-15.95053688681739, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.945642091121197,
-15.95053688681739, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-19.945642091121197,
-15.95053688681739, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.9 %
- Input A u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.1 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.272002982714554,
-17.84326686468871, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.2 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.272002982714554,
-17.84326686468871, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.272002982714554,
-17.84326686468871, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-18.272002982714554,
-17.84326686468871, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.419537437834283,
-19.561366407600115, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.419537437834283,
-19.561366407600115, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.419537437834283,
-19.561366407600115, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-16.419537437834283,
-19.561366407600115, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.3 %
- Input B u2
- 7.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.406375368805502,
-21.088020631104804, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.7 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.406375368805502,
-21.088020631104804, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.406375368805502,
-21.088020631104804, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-14.406375368805502,
-21.088020631104804, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.252219410264876,
-22.40828830873872, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.2 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.252219410264876,
-22.40828830873872, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.252219410264876,
-22.40828830873872, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-12.252219410264876,
-22.40828830873872, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.978152091261826,
-23.509248100449213, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.3 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.978152091261826,
-23.509248100449213, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.978152091261826,
-23.509248100449213, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-9.978152091261826,
-23.509248100449213, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.606429502458288,
-24.380125012578585, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.606429502458288,
-24.380125012578585, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.606429502458288,
-24.380125012578585, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-7.606429502458288,
-24.380125012578585, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.160263477787356,
-25.01239585175002, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.160263477787356,
-25.01239585175002, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-5.160263477787356,
-25.01239585175002, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-5.160263477787356,
-25.01239585175002, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.6635944223391905,
-25.399872640588402, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.2 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.6635944223391905,
-25.399872640588402, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.6635944223391905,
-25.399872640588402, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-2.6635944223391905,
-25.399872640588402, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.14085700978707325,
-25.5387631788938, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.0 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.14085700978707325,
-25.5387631788938, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-0.14085700978707325,
-25.5387631788938, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (-0.14085700978707325,
-25.5387631788938, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.383258957548364,
-25.427708157560982, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.9 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.383258957548364,
-25.427708157560982, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- A position
- (2.383258957548364,
-25.427708157560982, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (2.383258957548364,
-25.427708157560982, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.884050185555801,
-25.067794462014405, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.7 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.884050185555801,
-25.067794462014405, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- A position
- (4.884050185555801,
-25.067794462014405, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (4.884050185555801,
-25.067794462014405, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.7 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.337041657232881,
-24.462544534959097, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.3 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.337041657232881,
-24.462544534959097, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- A position
- (7.337041657232881,
-24.462544534959097, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (7.337041657232881,
-24.462544534959097, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.0 %
- Input A u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.9 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.718226167458456,
-23.617881902553275, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.718226167458456,
-23.617881902553275, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- A position
- (9.718226167458456,
-23.617881902553275, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (9.718226167458456,
-23.617881902553275, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 85.9 %
- Input A u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.004299279332388,
-22.542073201394935, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.6 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.004299279332388,
-22.542073201394935, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- A position
- (12.004299279332388,
-22.542073201394935, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (12.004299279332388,
-22.542073201394935, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.7 %
- Input A u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.6 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.172887402586472,
-21.245647273698992, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.6 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.172887402586472,
-21.245647273698992, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (14.172887402586472,
-21.245647273698992, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (14.172887402586472,
-21.245647273698992, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.6 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.20276676188379,
-19.741292122473176, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.5 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.20276676188379,
-19.741292122473176, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- A position
- (16.20276676188379,
-19.741292122473176, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (16.20276676188379,
-19.741292122473176, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.07407111198358,
-18.04373073518302, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.6 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.07407111198358,
-18.04373073518302, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (18.07407111198358,
-18.04373073518302, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (18.07407111198358,
-18.04373073518302, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.1 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.768486166882152,
-16.16957699120842, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.1 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.768486166882152,
-16.16957699120842, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- A position
- (19.768486166882152,
-16.16957699120842, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (19.768486166882152,
-16.16957699120842, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.0 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.5 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.26942884006942,
-14.137173063312586, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.26942884006942,
-14.137173063312586, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- A position
- (21.26942884006942,
-14.137173063312586, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (21.26942884006942,
-14.137173063312586, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.5 %
- Input A u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.4 %
- Input B u2
- 5.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.56220954169301,
-11.966409904460257, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.56220954169301,
-11.966409904460257, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- A position
- (22.56220954169301,
-11.966409904460257, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (22.56220954169301,
-11.966409904460257, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.4 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.634175944242266,
-9.678532576864532, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.634175944242266,
-9.678532576864532, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- A position
- (23.634175944242266,
-9.678532576864532, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (23.634175944242266,
-9.678532576864532, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.0 %
- Input B u2
- 4.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.474836809730366,
-7.295932328489296, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.474836809730366,
-7.295932328489296, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- A position
- (24.474836809730366,
-7.295932328489296, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (24.474836809730366,
-7.295932328489296, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.07596466648931,
-4.841927451935596, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.07596466648931,
-4.841927451935596, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- A position
- (25.07596466648931,
-4.841927451935596, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (25.07596466648931,
-4.841927451935596, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.43167633068911,
-2.340535070426219, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.43167633068911,
-2.340535070426219, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (25.43167633068911,
-2.340535070426219, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (25.43167633068911,
-2.340535070426219, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-08-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.3 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.53849048452454,
0.18376391560165656, 5.831594164825786) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.53849048452454,
0.18376391560165656, 7.040749094403252) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (25.53849048452454,
0.18376391560165656, 5.831594164825786) m - B position
- (25.53849048452454,
0.18376391560165656, 7.040749094403252) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.7 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.899651845551638,
-1.0203345316798877, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.3 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.899651845551638,
-1.0203345316798877, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-27.899651845551638,
-1.0203345316798877, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-27.899651845551638,
-1.0203345316798877, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.4 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.692974702493057,
-3.539888103685058, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.5 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.692974702493057,
-3.539888103685058, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-27.692974702493057,
-3.539888103685058, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-27.692974702493057,
-3.539888103685058, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.4 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.1 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.25923200556325,
-6.030416745665898, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.25923200556325,
-6.030416745665898, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-27.25923200556325,
-6.030416745665898, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-27.25923200556325,
-6.030416745665898, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.1 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.601980181140167,
-8.471499637121942, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.7 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.601980181140167,
-8.471499637121942, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-26.601980181140167,
-8.471499637121942, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-26.601980181140167,
-8.471499637121942, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.8 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.726608294542675,
-10.843121382641593, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.726608294542675,
-10.843121382641593, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.726608294542675,
-10.843121382641593, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-25.726608294542675,
-10.843121382641593, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.64029386297177,
-13.125836125974113, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.64029386297177,
-13.125836125974113, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-24.64029386297177,
-13.125836125974113, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-24.64029386297177,
-13.125836125974113, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.1 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.35194400423378,
-15.300926994226902, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.8 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.35194400423378,
-15.300926994226902, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.35194400423378,
-15.300926994226902, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-23.35194400423378,
-15.300926994226902, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.87212240379034,
-17.3505595648424, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.87212240379034,
-17.3505595648424, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.87212240379034,
-17.3505595648424, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-21.87212240379034,
-17.3505595648424, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.212962698960855,
-19.257928097018862, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.212962698960855,
-19.257928097018862, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-20.212962698960855,
-19.257928097018862, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-20.212962698960855,
-19.257928097018862, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.6 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
90.2 %
- u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.388068990474302,
-21.007393328566224, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.5 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.388068990474302,
-21.007393328566224, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.388068990474302,
-21.007393328566224, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-18.388068990474302,
-21.007393328566224, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 90.2 %
- Input A u2
- 2.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.41240429711524,
-22.584610708346617, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.41240429711524,
-22.584610708346617, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.41240429711524,
-22.584610708346617, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-16.41240429711524,
-22.584610708346617, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 89.7 %
- Input A u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.302167868068013,
-23.976648012871486, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.302167868068013,
-23.976648012871486, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.302167868068013,
-23.976648012871486, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-14.302167868068013,
-23.976648012871486, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.8 %
- Input A u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.074662358923366,
-25.17209138267082, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.8 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.074662358923366,
-25.17209138267082, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.074662358923366,
-25.17209138267082, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-12.074662358923366,
-25.17209138267082, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.74815196042352,
-26.16113890900055, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.74815196042352,
-26.16113890900055, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.74815196042352,
-26.16113890900055, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-9.74815196042352,
-26.16113890900055, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.1 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.341712643203533,
-26.935681003534267, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.8 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.341712643203533,
-26.935681003534267, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.341712643203533,
-26.935681003534267, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-7.341712643203533,
-26.935681003534267, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.1 %
- Input A u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.8 %
- Input B u2
- 3.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.5 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.875075746431269,
-27.489366892056445, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.875075746431269,
-27.489366892056445, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-4.875075746431269,
-27.489366892056445, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-4.875075746431269,
-27.489366892056445, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.3 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.368466192823853,
-27.81765668694942, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.368466192823853,
-27.81765668694942, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.368466192823853,
-27.81765668694942, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (-2.368466192823853,
-27.81765668694942, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.15756334342091247,
-27.917858611511406, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.4 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.15756334342091247,
-27.917858611511406, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (0.15756334342091247,
-27.917858611511406, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (0.15756334342091247,
-27.917858611511406, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.1 %
- Input A u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.6823009560558866,
-27.789151070888675, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.5 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.6823009560558866,
-27.789151070888675, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (2.6823009560558866,
-27.789151070888675, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (2.6823009560558866,
-27.789151070888675, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.185045331821963,
-27.432589388653827, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.1 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.185045331821963,
-27.432589388653827, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- A position
- (5.185045331821963,
-27.432589388653827, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (5.185045331821963,
-27.432589388653827, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.1 %
- Input B u2
- 3.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.645275488629411,
-26.85109715379418, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.645275488629411,
-26.85109715379418, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (7.645275488629411,
-26.85109715379418, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (7.645275488629411,
-26.85109715379418, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.042819035133222,
-26.049442249059712, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.4 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.042819035133222,
-26.049442249059712, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- A position
- (10.042819035133222,
-26.049442249059712, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (10.042819035133222,
-26.049442249059712, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.5 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.35801757207633,
-25.034197757223698, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.6 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.35801757207633,
-25.034197757223698, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (12.35801757207633,
-25.034197757223698, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (12.35801757207633,
-25.034197757223698, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.6 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.571887879210262,
-23.81368806580065, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.571887879210262,
-23.81368806580065, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- A position
- (14.571887879210262,
-23.81368806580065, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (14.571887879210262,
-23.81368806580065, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.8 %
- Input A u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.66627756615844,
-22.397920612130388, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.66627756615844,
-22.397920612130388, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (16.66627756615844,
-22.397920612130388, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (16.66627756615844,
-22.397920612130388, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.7 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.624013910979716,
-20.79850382847683, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.0 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.624013910979716,
-20.79850382847683, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (18.624013910979716,
-20.79850382847683, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (18.624013910979716,
-20.79850382847683, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.0 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.4 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.429044666046455,
-19.028551959941943, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.4 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.429044666046455,
-19.028551959941943, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (20.429044666046455,
-19.028551959941943, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (20.429044666046455,
-19.028551959941943, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.4 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.066569676714465,
-17.10257753563003, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.9 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.066569676714465,
-17.10257753563003, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- A position
- (22.066569676714465,
-17.10257753563003, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (22.066569676714465,
-17.10257753563003, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.9 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.3 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.523162233591947,
-15.03637237473337, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.523162233591947,
-15.03637237473337, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- A position
- (23.523162233591947,
-15.03637237473337, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (23.523162233591947,
-15.03637237473337, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.1 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.1 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.786879163392342,
-12.846878103217062, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.786879163392342,
-12.846878103217062, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- A position
- (24.786879163392342,
-12.846878103217062, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (24.786879163392342,
-12.846878103217062, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.847358755693264,
-10.552047242787445, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.847358755693264,
-10.552047242787445, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (25.847358755693264,
-10.552047242787445, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (25.847358755693264,
-10.552047242787445, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.8 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.7 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.695905722661546,
-8.170696011130131, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.3 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.695905722661546,
-8.170696011130131, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- A position
- (26.695905722661546,
-8.170696011130131, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (26.695905722661546,
-8.170696011130131, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.3 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.325562495126295,
-5.722350040366153, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.325562495126295,
-5.722350040366153, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- A position
- (27.325562495126295,
-5.722350040366153, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (27.325562495126295,
-5.722350040366153, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.4 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.73116627041555,
-3.227084278741156, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.73116627041555,
-3.227084278741156, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 2.4 percentage points
- A position
- (27.73116627041555,
-3.227084278741156, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (27.73116627041555,
-3.227084278741156, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-09-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.90939134419896,
-0.705358388256275, 7.088188329651571) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.90939134419896,
-0.705358388256275, 8.297343259229036) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (27.90939134419896,
-0.705358388256275, 7.088188329651571) m - B position
- (27.90939134419896,
-0.705358388256275, 8.297343259229036) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.69997297302566,
0.04073641484174669, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.69997297302566,
0.04073641484174669, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.69997297302566,
0.04073641484174669, 7.95) m - B position
- (-30.69997297302566,
0.04073641484174669, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.1 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.60169617920668,
-2.45483012763152, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.60169617920668,
-2.45483012763152, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.60169617920668,
-2.45483012763152, 7.95) m - B position
- (-30.60169617920668,
-2.45483012763152, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.4 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.300893727569505,
-4.934150312925137, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.1 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.300893727569505,
-4.934150312925137, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.300893727569505,
-4.934150312925137, 7.95) m - B position
- (-30.300893727569505,
-4.934150312925137, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.1 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.6 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.79955636444513,
-7.380815705750812, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.8 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.79955636444513,
-7.380815705750812, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-29.79955636444513,
-7.380815705750812, 7.95) m - B position
- (-29.79955636444513,
-7.380815705750812, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.9 %
- u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.10100200001282,
-9.778633984113016, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.10100200001282,
-9.778633984113016, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-29.10100200001282,
-9.778633984113016, 7.95) m - B position
- (-29.10100200001282,
-9.778633984113016, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.9 %
- Input A u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.9 %
- Input B u2
- 8.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.5 %
- u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.20985374997668,
-12.111736102018023, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.4 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.20985374997668,
-12.111736102018023, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+20.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-28.20985374997668,
-12.111736102018023, 7.95) m - B position
- (-28.20985374997668,
-12.111736102018023, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 70.5 %
- Input A u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.13200933923716,
-14.364681312704002, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.13200933923716,
-14.364681312704002, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-27.13200933923716,
-14.364681312704002, 7.95) m - B position
- (-27.13200933923716,
-14.364681312704002, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 8.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.874602070047587,
-16.522559357335936, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 13.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.874602070047587,
-16.522559357335936, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.874602070047587,
-16.522559357335936, 7.95) m - B position
- (-25.874602070047587,
-16.522559357335936, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.2 %
- Input B u2
- 13.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.445953612973103,
-18.57108914286848, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 13.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.445953612973103,
-18.57108914286848, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 18.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-24.445953612973103,
-18.57108914286848, 7.95) m - B position
- (-24.445953612973103,
-18.57108914286848, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.6 %
- Input B u2
- 13.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.5 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.85551893308707,
-20.496713256014946, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 16.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.85551893308707,
-20.496713256014946, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 19.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-22.85551893308707,
-20.496713256014946, 7.95) m - B position
- (-22.85551893308707,
-20.496713256014946, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 16.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.113823715889872,
-22.286687687817736, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.2 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.113823715889872,
-22.286687687817736, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.113823715889872,
-22.286687687817736, 7.95) m - B position
- (-21.113823715889872,
-22.286687687817736, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.5 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.232394707072864,
-23.92916617501237, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.232394707072864,
-23.92916617501237, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.232394707072864,
-23.92916617501237, 7.95) m - B position
- (-19.232394707072864,
-23.92916617501237, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.5 %
- Input A u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.9 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.22368342714711,
-25.413278600003935, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.22368342714711,
-25.413278600003935, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-17.22368342714711,
-25.413278600003935, 7.95) m - B position
- (-17.22368342714711,
-25.413278600003935, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.9 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.100983765802635,
-26.729202930595694, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.100983765802635,
-26.729202930595694, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-15.100983765802635,
-26.729202930595694, 7.95) m - B position
- (-15.100983765802635,
-26.729202930595694, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.87834400136841,
-27.868230223363994, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.6 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.87834400136841,
-27.868230223363994, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.87834400136841,
-27.868230223363994, 7.95) m - B position
- (-12.87834400136841,
-27.868230223363994, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.6 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.570473827638823,
-28.82282226047968, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.6 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.570473827638823,
-28.82282226047968, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-10.570473827638823,
-28.82282226047968, 7.95) m - B position
- (-10.570473827638823,
-28.82282226047968, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.2 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.3 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.19264700337405,
-29.586661438528452, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.19264700337405,
-29.586661438528452, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-8.19264700337405,
-29.586661438528452, 7.95) m - B position
- (-8.19264700337405,
-29.586661438528452, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.760600268751563,
-30.154692579160205, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.760600268751563,
-30.154692579160205, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-5.760600268751563,
-30.154692579160205, 7.95) m - B position
- (-5.760600268751563,
-30.154692579160205, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.0 %
- Input B u2
- 8.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.8 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.290429197751628,
-30.523156384859412, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.290429197751628,
-30.523156384859412, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-3.290429197751628,
-30.523156384859412, 7.95) m - B position
- (-3.290429197751628,
-30.523156384859412, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 8.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.5 %
- u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.7984816757381148,
-30.689614318422294, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.7984816757381148,
-30.689614318422294, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-0.7984816757381148,
-30.689614318422294, 7.95) m - B position
- (-0.7984816757381148,
-30.689614318422294, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.5 %
- Input A u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.1 %
- Input B u2
- 12.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.69875029278737,
-30.65296474148553, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.0 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.69875029278737,
-30.65296474148553, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- A position
- (1.69875029278737,
-30.65296474148553, 7.95) m - B position
- (1.69875029278737,
-30.65296474148553, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.0 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.7 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.184739730228928,
-30.413450205299686, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
95.0 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.184739730228928,
-30.413450205299686, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+20.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- A position
- (4.184739730228928,
-30.413450205299686, 7.95) m - B position
- (4.184739730228928,
-30.413450205299686, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 95.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.3 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.643034063395892,
-29.972655845496273, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.643034063395892,
-29.972655845496273, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- A position
- (6.643034063395892,
-29.972655845496273, 7.95) m - B position
- (6.643034063395892,
-29.972655845496273, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.6 %
- Input B u2
- 2.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.2 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.05736400858517,
-29.333498891471947, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.3 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.05736400858517,
-29.333498891471947, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (9.05736400858517,
-29.333498891471947, 7.95) m - B position
- (9.05736400858517,
-29.333498891471947, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.3 %
- Input B u2
- 2.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.5 %
- u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.411751243631995,
-28.50020935981811, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.411751243631995,
-28.50020935981811, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.6 percentage points
- A position
- (11.411751243631995,
-28.50020935981811, 7.95) m - B position
- (11.411751243631995,
-28.50020935981811, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.5 %
- Input A u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.5 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.690614154342688,
-27.47830205956896, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.8 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.690614154342688,
-27.47830205956896, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- A position
- (13.690614154342688,
-27.47830205956896, 7.95) m - B position
- (13.690614154342688,
-27.47830205956896, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.878870955466967,
-26.27454009454072, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.9 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.878870955466967,
-26.27454009454072, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (15.878870955466967,
-26.27454009454072, 7.95) m - B position
- (15.878870955466967,
-26.27454009454072, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.96203950374298,
-24.896890104307744, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.5 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.96203950374298,
-24.896890104307744, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (17.96203950374298,
-24.896890104307744, 7.95) m - B position
- (17.96203950374298,
-24.896890104307744, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.0 %
- Input A u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.92633314244049,
-23.354469540036185, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.92633314244049,
-23.354469540036185, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- A position
- (19.92633314244049,
-23.354469540036185, 7.95) m - B position
- (19.92633314244049,
-23.354469540036185, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.8 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.758751943091625,
-21.65748632410988, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.0 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.758751943091625,
-21.65748632410988, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- A position
- (21.758751943091625,
-21.65748632410988, 7.95) m - B position
- (21.758751943091625,
-21.65748632410988, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.0 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.4471687405606,
-19.817171292888347, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.5 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.4471687405606,
-19.817171292888347, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (23.4471687405606,
-19.817171292888347, 7.95) m - B position
- (23.4471687405606,
-19.817171292888347, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.3 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.98040939206212,
-17.845703869698575, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.98040939206212,
-17.845703869698575, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- A position
- (24.98040939206212,
-17.845703869698575, 7.95) m - B position
- (24.98040939206212,
-17.845703869698575, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.3 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.8 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.348326728964725,
-15.756131459965777, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.348326728964725,
-15.756131459965777, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- A position
- (26.348326728964725,
-15.756131459965777, 7.95) m - B position
- (26.348326728964725,
-15.756131459965777, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.4 %
- Input B u2
- 7.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.541867711957313,
-13.56228310193544, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.3 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.541867711957313,
-13.56228310193544, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (27.541867711957313,
-13.56228310193544, 7.95) m - B position
- (27.541867711957313,
-13.56228310193544, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.1 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.4 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.55313334513788,
-11.278677944456764, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.55313334513788,
-11.278677944456764, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- A position
- (28.55313334513788,
-11.278677944456764, 7.95) m - B position
- (28.55313334513788,
-11.278677944456764, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.4 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.5 %
- u2
- 13.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.375430952506075,
-8.920429157532059, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.2 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.375430952506075,
-8.920429157532059, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 20.7 percentage points
- A position
- (29.375430952506075,
-8.920429157532059, 7.95) m - B position
- (29.375430952506075,
-8.920429157532059, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.5 %
- Input A u2
- 13.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.7 %
- u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.003318470887386,
-6.503143911563705, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.003318470887386,
-6.503143911563705, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.8 percentage points
- A position
- (30.003318470887386,
-6.503143911563705, 7.95) m - B position
- (30.003318470887386,
-6.503143911563705, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 74.7 %
- Input A u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.432640466153206,
-4.042820087247832, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.432640466153206,
-4.042820087247832, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (30.432640466153206,
-4.042820087247832, 7.95) m - B position
- (30.432640466153206,
-4.042820087247832, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.1 %
- Input A u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-10-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.66055563437719,
-1.5557403997008594, 7.95) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.66055563437719,
-1.5557403997008594, 9.049999999999999) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- A position
- (30.66055563437719,
-1.5557403997008594, 7.95) m - B position
- (30.66055563437719,
-1.5557403997008594, 9.049999999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.370809891269694,
-1.4377470977590012, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.7 %
- u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.370809891269694,
-1.4377470977590012, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-33.370809891269694,
-1.4377470977590012, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-33.370809891269694,
-1.4377470977590012, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.7 %
- Input B u2
- 9.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.16680493190406,
-3.9548856020625904, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.16680493190406,
-3.9548856020625904, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-33.16680493190406,
-3.9548856020625904, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-33.16680493190406,
-3.9548856020625904, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.6 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.77320696838725,
-6.449416603354997, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.77320696838725,
-6.449416603354997, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.77320696838725,
-6.449416603354997, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-32.77320696838725,
-6.449416603354997, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.8 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.19226594371147,
-8.907080493951558, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.0 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.19226594371147,
-8.907080493951558, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.19226594371147,
-8.907080493951558, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-32.19226594371147,
-8.907080493951558, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.0 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.9 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.427302719030802,
-11.313828411407732, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.427302719030802,
-11.313828411407732, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-31.427302719030802,
-11.313828411407732, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-31.427302719030802,
-11.313828411407732, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.6 %
- u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.482690090462633,
-13.65590254670811, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.482690090462633,
-13.65590254670811, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.482690090462633,
-13.65590254670811, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-30.482690090462633,
-13.65590254670811, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.6 %
- Input A u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
67.9 %
- u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.363827792662647,
-15.919914788692507, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.9 %
- u2
- 16.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.363827792662647,
-15.919914788692507, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-29.363827792662647,
-15.919914788692507, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-29.363827792662647,
-15.919914788692507, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 67.9 %
- Input A u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.9 %
- Input B u2
- 16.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.0 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.077111632061616,
-18.09292325516051, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.3 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.077111632061616,
-18.09292325516051, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-28.077111632061616,
-18.09292325516051, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-28.077111632061616,
-18.09292325516051, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.3 %
- Input B u2
- 9.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.3 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.629896926209092,
-20.162506273175893, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.629896926209092,
-20.162506273175893, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-26.629896926209092,
-20.162506273175893, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-26.629896926209092,
-20.162506273175893, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.3 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.030456458217515,
-22.116833385673793, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.030456458217515,
-22.116833385673793, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.030456458217515,
-22.116833385673793, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-25.030456458217515,
-22.116833385673793, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.3 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.5 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.287933186653746,
-23.94473297847209, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.287933186653746,
-23.94473297847209, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.287933186653746,
-23.94473297847209, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-23.287933186653746,
-23.94473297847209, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.41228798120473,
-25.635756141107542, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.2 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.41228798120473,
-25.635756141107542, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.41228798120473,
-25.635756141107542, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-21.41228798120473,
-25.635756141107542, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.414242682878463,
-27.180236396445814, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.414242682878463,
-27.180236396445814, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.414242682878463,
-27.180236396445814, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-19.414242682878463,
-27.180236396445814, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.305218814227914,
-28.5693449576302, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.7 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.305218814227914,
-28.5693449576302, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-17.305218814227914,
-28.5693449576302, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-17.305218814227914,
-28.5693449576302, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.097272289951661,
-29.795141196501074, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.097272289951661,
-29.795141196501074, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-15.097272289951661,
-29.795141196501074, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-15.097272289951661,
-29.795141196501074, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.803024501088231,
-30.850618034991005, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.6 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.803024501088231,
-30.850618034991005, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.803024501088231,
-30.850618034991005, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-12.803024501088231,
-30.850618034991005, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.435590166750597,
-31.729742000022565, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.9 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.435590166750597,
-31.729742000022565, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-10.435590166750597,
-31.729742000022565, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-10.435590166750597,
-31.729742000022565, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.9 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.0085023658259,
-32.42748771294099, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.2 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.0085023658259,
-32.42748771294099, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-8.0085023658259,
-32.42748771294099, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-8.0085023658259,
-32.42748771294099, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.5356351771849015,
-32.93986661632817, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.5356351771849015,
-32.93986661632817, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-5.5356351771849015,
-32.93986661632817, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-5.5356351771849015,
-32.93986661632817, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.6 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.031124370616815,
-33.26394977398551, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.031124370616815,
-33.26394977398551, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-3.031124370616815,
-33.26394977398551, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-3.031124370616815,
-33.26394977398551, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.6 %
- Input A u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.5092866018477866,
-33.39788461375295, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.5092866018477866,
-33.39788461375295, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-0.5092866018477866,
-33.39788461375295, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (-0.5092866018477866,
-33.39788461375295, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.0 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.015462426447642,
-33.34090551745641, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.5 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.015462426447642,
-33.34090551745641, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (2.015462426447642,
-33.34090551745641, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (2.015462426447642,
-33.34090551745641, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.5 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.52869036982191,
-33.093338197447835, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.0 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.52869036982191,
-33.093338197447835, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+17.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- A position
- (4.52869036982191,
-33.093338197447835, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (4.52869036982191,
-33.093338197447835, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.3 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.016030742359979,
-32.656597834719975, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.016030742359979,
-32.656597834719975, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- A position
- (7.016030742359979,
-32.656597834719975, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (7.016030742359979,
-32.656597834719975, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.3 %
- Input A u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.463265040514575,
-32.03318098923915, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.8 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.463265040514575,
-32.03318098923915, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- A position
- (9.463265040514575,
-32.03318098923915, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (9.463265040514575,
-32.03318098923915, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.9 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.856404021022703,
-31.226651328739276, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.7 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.856404021022703,
-31.226651328739276, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.4 percentage points
- A position
- (11.856404021022703,
-31.226651328739276, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (11.856404021022703,
-31.226651328739276, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.0 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.181767668290513,
-30.241619257556422, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.7 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.181767668290513,
-30.241619257556422, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (14.181767668290513,
-30.241619257556422, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (14.181767668290513,
-30.241619257556422, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.0 %
- Input A u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.426063394125272,
-29.083715561952456, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.426063394125272,
-29.083715561952456, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (16.426063394125272,
-29.083715561952456, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (16.426063394125272,
-29.083715561952456, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.576462022797248,
-27.759559222580414, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.576462022797248,
-27.759559222580414, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.8 percentage points
- A position
- (18.576462022797248,
-27.759559222580414, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (18.576462022797248,
-27.759559222580414, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 8.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.620671127074782,
-26.27671957808665, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.8 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.620671127074782,
-26.27671957808665, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (20.620671127074782,
-26.27671957808665, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (20.620671127074782,
-26.27671957808665, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.9 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.54700529601794,
-24.643673056135864, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.54700529601794,
-24.643673056135864, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (22.54700529601794,
-24.643673056135864, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (22.54700529601794,
-24.643673056135864, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.34445293285584,
-22.869754719199424, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.34445293285584,
-22.869754719199424, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- A position
- (24.34445293285584,
-22.869754719199424, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (24.34445293285584,
-22.869754719199424, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.0 %
- Input B u2
- 6.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.00273920110748,
-20.965104902088278, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.8 %
- u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.00273920110748,
-20.965104902088278, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 16.5 percentage points
- A position
- (26.00273920110748,
-20.965104902088278, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (26.00273920110748,
-20.965104902088278, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.1 %
- Input A u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.8 %
- Input B u2
- 11.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.51238475912431,
-18.940611246268745, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.4 %
- u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.51238475912431,
-18.940611246268745, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (27.51238475912431,
-18.940611246268745, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (27.51238475912431,
-18.940611246268745, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.4 %
- Input B u2
- 10.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.7 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.864759947307352,
-16.807846462313336, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.1 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.864759947307352,
-16.807846462313336, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- A position
- (28.864759947307352,
-16.807846462313336, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (28.864759947307352,
-16.807846462313336, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.2 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.052134118245935,
-14.579002176258028, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.052134118245935,
-14.579002176258028, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.1 percentage points
- A position
- (30.052134118245935,
-14.579002176258028, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (30.052134118245935,
-14.579002176258028, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 70.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.3 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.06771982778974,
-12.266819238023277, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.06771982778974,
-12.266819238023277, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- A position
- (31.06771982778974,
-12.266819238023277, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (31.06771982778974,
-12.266819238023277, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.3 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.905711634442646,
-9.884514890280093, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.3 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.905711634442646,
-9.884514890280093, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- A position
- (31.905711634442646,
-9.884514890280093, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (31.905711634442646,
-9.884514890280093, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.3 %
- Input B u2
- 8.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.2 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.56131928528751,
-7.445707214089294, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.56131928528751,
-7.445707214089294, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (32.56131928528751,
-7.445707214089294, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (32.56131928528751,
-7.445707214089294, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.2 %
- Input A u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.2 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.03079509873959,
-4.964337283208976, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.03079509873959,
-4.964337283208976, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- A position
- (33.03079509873959,
-4.964337283208976, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (33.03079509873959,
-4.964337283208976, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.2 %
- Input A u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.5 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.31145538759923,
-2.4545894720632626, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.31145538759923,
-2.4545894720632626, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- A position
- (33.31145538759923,
-2.4545894720632626, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (33.31145538759923,
-2.4545894720632626, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.5 %
- Input A u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.3 %
- Input B u2
- 11.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-11-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.40169579994229,
0.0691896270802497, 8.76959548994628) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.40169579994229,
0.0691896270802497, 9.924172954735011) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- A position
- (33.40169579994229,
0.0691896270802497, 8.76959548994628) m - B position
- (33.40169579994229,
0.0691896270802497, 9.924172954735011) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.4 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.618843631362054,
-0.3974013596808566, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
75.5 %
- u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.618843631362054,
-0.3974013596808566, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.618843631362054,
-0.3974013596808566, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-35.618843631362054,
-0.3974013596808566, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.4 %
- Input A u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 75.5 %
- Input B u2
- 10.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.9 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.50200779511638,
-2.909878346528091, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.50200779511638,
-2.909878346528091, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.50200779511638,
-2.909878346528091, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-35.50200779511638,
-2.909878346528091, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 9.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.208168586534775,
-5.407847469949837, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.208168586534775,
-5.407847469949837, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.208168586534775,
-5.407847469949837, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-35.208168586534775,
-5.407847469949837, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.73879100813608,
-7.878854534076695, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.73879100813608,
-7.878854534076695, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-34.73879100813608,
-7.878854534076695, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-34.73879100813608,
-7.878854534076695, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.3 %
- Input B u2
- 11.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.9 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.096215249093675,
-10.310579768546935, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.096215249093675,
-10.310579768546935, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-34.096215249093675,
-10.310579768546935, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-34.096215249093675,
-10.310579768546935, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.6 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.3 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.28364501768761,
-12.690899251536745, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.28364501768761,
-12.690899251536745, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-33.28364501768761,
-12.690899251536745, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-33.28364501768761,
-12.690899251536745, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.0 %
- Input B u2
- 8.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.30513156848492,
-15.007945356342972, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.30513156848492,
-15.007945356342972, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.30513156848492,
-15.007945356342972, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-32.30513156848492,
-15.007945356342972, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.6 %
- Input A u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.2 %
- Input B u2
- 9.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.8 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.165553503884208,
-17.250165920147783, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.165553503884208,
-17.250165920147783, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-31.165553503884208,
-17.250165920147783, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-31.165553503884208,
-17.250165920147783, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.1 %
- u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.870592450728644,
-19.40638183996621, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.8 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.870592450728644,
-19.40638183996621, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-29.870592450728644,
-19.40638183996621, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-29.870592450728644,
-19.40638183996621, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.1 %
- Input A u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.8 %
- Input B u2
- 8.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.426704733256962,
-21.46584280861861, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.0 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.426704733256962,
-21.46584280861861, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-28.426704733256962,
-21.46584280861861, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-28.426704733256962,
-21.46584280861861, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.84108918362374,
-23.41828091284358, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.84108918362374,
-23.41828091284358, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-26.84108918362374,
-23.41828091284358, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-26.84108918362374,
-23.41828091284358, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.121651250476646,
-25.25396182632583, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.0 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.121651250476646,
-25.25396182632583, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.121651250476646,
-25.25396182632583, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-25.121651250476646,
-25.25396182632583, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.0 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.27696358453575,
-26.96373334240446, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.27696358453575,
-26.96373334240446, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.27696358453575,
-26.96373334240446, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-23.27696358453575,
-26.96373334240446, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 3.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.316223297684495,
-28.53907100449049, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.316223297684495,
-28.53907100449049, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.316223297684495,
-28.53907100449049, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-21.316223297684495,
-28.53907100449049, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.8 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.24920610866675,
-29.972120606693213, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.24920610866675,
-29.972120606693213, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.24920610866675,
-29.972120606693213, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-19.24920610866675,
-29.972120606693213, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.086217604007164,
-31.25573735275834, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-17.086217604007164,
-31.25573735275834, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-17.086217604007164,
-31.25573735275834, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-17.086217604007164,
-31.25573735275834, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.0 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.838041857154762,
-32.38352147808235, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.3 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.838041857154762,
-32.38352147808235, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.838041857154762,
-32.38352147808235, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-14.838041857154762,
-32.38352147808235, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.0 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.3 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.515887662020349,
-33.34985015720137, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.0 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.515887662020349,
-33.34985015720137, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.515887662020349,
-33.34985015720137, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-12.515887662020349,
-33.34985015720137, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.13133264897333,
-34.149905537672346, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.6 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.13133264897333,
-34.149905537672346, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-10.13133264897333,
-34.149905537672346, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-10.13133264897333,
-34.149905537672346, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.0 %
- u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.696265561919831,
-34.779698760577325, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.2 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.696265561919831,
-34.779698760577325, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.696265561919831,
-34.779698760577325, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-7.696265561919831,
-34.779698760577325, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.0 %
- Input A u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.1 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.222826984253346,
-35.23608984789107, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.8 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-5.222826984253346,
-35.23608984789107, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-5.222826984253346,
-35.23608984789107, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-5.222826984253346,
-35.23608984789107, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.8 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.723348809201976,
-35.51680335755901, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.9 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.723348809201976,
-35.51680335755901, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.723348809201976,
-35.51680335755901, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-2.723348809201976,
-35.51680335755901, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.8 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.21029275635682126,
-35.620439728233585, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.1 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-0.21029275635682126,
-35.620439728233585, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-0.21029275635682126,
-35.620439728233585, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (-0.21029275635682126,
-35.620439728233585, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.3 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.3038117590786045,
-35.54648225710708, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.3038117590786045,
-35.54648225710708, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- A position
- (2.3038117590786045,
-35.54648225710708, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (2.3038117590786045,
-35.54648225710708, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.3 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.806430094550994,
-35.29529967605165, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.4 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (4.806430094550994,
-35.29529967605165, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- A position
- (4.806430094550994,
-35.29529967605165, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (4.806430094550994,
-35.29529967605165, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.285084874481895,
-34.86814431322224, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.285084874481895,
-34.86814431322224, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- A position
- (7.285084874481895,
-34.86814431322224, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (7.285084874481895,
-34.86814431322224, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.0 %
- Input A u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.4 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.727418199074883,
-34.26714584928841, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.4 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.727418199074883,
-34.26714584928841, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- A position
- (9.727418199074883,
-34.26714584928841, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (9.727418199074883,
-34.26714584928841, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.4 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.4 %
- Input B u2
- 2.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.8 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.12125325744882,
-33.49530069942474, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.2 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.12125325744882,
-33.49530069942474, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- A position
- (12.12125325744882,
-33.49530069942474, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (12.12125325744882,
-33.49530069942474, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.3 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.454655037911047,
-32.55645707399824, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.454655037911047,
-32.55645707399824, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.9 percentage points
- A position
- (14.454655037911047,
-32.55645707399824, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (14.454655037911047,
-32.55645707399824, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.3 %
- Input A u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.71598983268535,
-31.455295792436246, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (16.71598983268535,
-31.455295792436246, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (16.71598983268535,
-31.455295792436246, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (16.71598983268535,
-31.455295792436246, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.89398324042055,
-30.19730694593153, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.89398324042055,
-30.19730694593153, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- A position
- (18.89398324042055,
-30.19730694593153, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (18.89398324042055,
-30.19730694593153, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.977776377294653,
-28.78876252533818, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.977776377294653,
-28.78876252533818, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (20.977776377294653,
-28.78876252533818, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (20.977776377294653,
-28.78876252533818, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.9569800164615,
-27.236685150727954, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.9569800164615,
-27.236685150727954, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- A position
- (22.9569800164615,
-27.236685150727954, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (22.9569800164615,
-27.236685150727954, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.4 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.82172638591524,
-25.548813058513236, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.5 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.82172638591524,
-25.548813058513236, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (24.82172638591524,
-25.548813058513236, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (24.82172638591524,
-25.548813058513236, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.4 %
- Input A u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.5 %
- Input B u2
- 6.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.56271836652253,
-23.733561520701098, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.5 %
- u2
- 19.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.56271836652253,
-23.733561520701098, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−7.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 21.6 percentage points
- A position
- (26.56271836652253,
-23.733561520701098, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (26.56271836652253,
-23.733561520701098, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.8 %
- Input A u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.5 %
- Input B u2
- 19.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.1 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.171275844934414,
-21.799980888631808, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.171275844934414,
-21.799980888631808, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.9 percentage points
- A position
- (28.171275844934414,
-21.799980888631808, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (28.171275844934414,
-21.799980888631808, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.3 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.63937899027489,
-19.757711470384134, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.63937899027489,
-19.757711470384134, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (29.63937899027489,
-19.757711470384134, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (29.63937899027489,
-19.757711470384134, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.959708238840335,
-17.616935466816553, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.959708238840335,
-17.616935466816553, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- A position
- (30.959708238840335,
-17.616935466816553, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (30.959708238840335,
-17.616935466816553, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.1 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.1 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.125680787456986,
-15.388326205878096, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.7 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.125680787456986,
-15.388326205878096, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (32.125680787456986,
-15.388326205878096, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (32.125680787456986,
-15.388326205878096, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.7 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.13148341355027,
-13.082994928293006, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.13148341355027,
-13.082994928293006, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (33.13148341355027,
-13.082994928293006, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (33.13148341355027,
-13.082994928293006, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.7 %
- Input A u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.97210145829442,
-10.712435389931077, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.9 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.97210145829442,
-10.712435389931077, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- A position
- (33.97210145829442,
-10.712435389931077, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (33.97210145829442,
-10.712435389931077, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.8 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.64334382833986,
-8.288466557061307, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.7 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.64334382833986,
-8.288466557061307, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (34.64334382833986,
-8.288466557061307, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (34.64334382833986,
-8.288466557061307, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-042
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.1 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.14186389146686,
-5.823173680194926, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.14186389146686,
-5.823173680194926, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.0 percentage points
- A position
- (35.14186389146686,
-5.823173680194926, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (35.14186389146686,
-5.823173680194926, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.1 %
- Input A u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-043
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.46517616198514,
-3.328848040307347, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.4 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.46517616198514,
-3.328848040307347, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (35.46517616198514,
-3.328848040307347, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (35.46517616198514,
-3.328848040307347, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.4 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-12-044
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.4 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.61166869269078,
-0.8179256678482454, 9.941757293967768) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.5 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.61166869269078,
-0.8179256678482454, 11.096334758756502) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (35.61166869269078,
-0.8179256678482454, 9.941757293967768) m - B position
- (35.61166869269078,
-0.8179256678482454, 11.096334758756502) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.5 %
- Input B u2
- 6.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.4 %
- u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.83501765757724,
0.6354457214751459, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.83501765757724,
0.6354457214751459, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.83501765757724,
0.6354457214751459, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-37.83501765757724,
0.6354457214751459, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.4 %
- Input A u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.0 %
- Input B u2
- 11.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.794095398298964,
-1.870482675247112, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.794095398298964,
-1.870482675247112, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.794095398298964,
-1.870482675247112, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-37.794095398298964,
-1.870482675247112, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.0 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.58737994424747,
-4.368205734727444, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.58737994424747,
-4.368205734727444, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.58737994424747,
-4.368205734727444, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-37.58737994424747,
-4.368205734727444, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.21577810414975,
-6.846766573851531, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.1 %
- u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.21577810414975,
-6.846766573851531, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.21577810414975,
-6.846766573851531, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-37.21577810414975,
-6.846766573851531, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.1 %
- Input B u2
- 11.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.5 %
- u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.68092000185463,
-9.29529236934822, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.8 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.68092000185463,
-9.29529236934822, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-36.68092000185463,
-9.29529236934822, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-36.68092000185463,
-9.29529236934822, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.5 %
- Input A u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.8 %
- Input B u2
- 4.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.4 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.98515192538926,
-11.703042054131748, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.98515192538926,
-11.703042054131748, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.98515192538926,
-11.703042054131748, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-35.98515192538926,
-11.703042054131748, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.4 %
- Input A u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 10.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.0 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.131526034383405,
-14.059453435662547, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.2 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.131526034383405,
-14.059453435662547, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.131526034383405,
-14.059453435662547, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-35.131526034383405,
-14.059453435662547, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.2 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.12378697101251,
-16.35418952963062, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.9 %
- u2
- 11.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.12378697101251,
-16.35418952963062, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-34.12378697101251,
-16.35418952963062, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-34.12378697101251,
-16.35418952963062, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.2 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.9 %
- Input B u2
- 11.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.7 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.96635543319388,
-18.57718390570678, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.2 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.96635543319388,
-18.57718390570678, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.96635543319388,
-18.57718390570678, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-32.96635543319388,
-18.57718390570678, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.66430878209634,
-20.71868484644185, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
73.2 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.66430878209634,
-20.71868484644185, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−4.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-31.66430878209634,
-20.71868484644185, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-31.66430878209634,
-20.71868484644185, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.4 %
- Input A u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 73.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.22335876903329,
-22.769298125599335, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.22335876903329,
-22.769298125599335, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.22335876903329,
-22.769298125599335, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-30.22335876903329,
-22.769298125599335, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.1 %
- Input A u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.6498264794456,
-24.720028218264243, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.8 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.6498264794456,
-24.720028218264243, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-28.6498264794456,
-24.720028218264243, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-28.6498264794456,
-24.720028218264243, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.2 %
- Input A u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
89.9 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.95061460388907,
-26.562317761949238, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.95061460388907,
-26.562317761949238, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−3.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-26.95061460388907,
-26.562317761949238, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-26.95061460388907,
-26.562317761949238, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 89.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.0 %
- Input B u2
- 5.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.133177157666218,
-28.28808509559259, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.133177157666218,
-28.28808509559259, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.133177157666218,
-28.28808509559259, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-25.133177157666218,
-28.28808509559259, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.205486781935292,
-29.889759711773348, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.205486781935292,
-29.889759711773348, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.205486781935292,
-29.889759711773348, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-23.205486781935292,
-29.889759711773348, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.175999769737746,
-31.360315466624208, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.7 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.175999769737746,
-31.360315466624208, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.175999769737746,
-31.360315466624208, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-21.175999769737746,
-31.360315466624208, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.053618970366784,
-32.69330140175815, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.053618970366784,
-32.69330140175815, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.053618970366784,
-32.69330140175815, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-19.053618970366784,
-32.69330140175815, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.0 %
- Input B u2
- 2.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.847654734805648,
-33.88287004300113, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.4 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.847654734805648,
-33.88287004300113, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.847654734805648,
-33.88287004300113, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-16.847654734805648,
-33.88287004300113, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.4 %
- Input B u2
- 5.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.56778407355864,
-34.923803051791104, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.7 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.56778407355864,
-34.923803051791104, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.56778407355864,
-34.923803051791104, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-14.56778407355864,
-34.923803051791104, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 84.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.7 %
- Input B u2
- 3.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.224008206038828,
-35.81153411671745, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.7 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.224008206038828,
-35.81153411671745, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.224008206038828,
-35.81153411671745, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-12.224008206038828,
-35.81153411671745, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.2 %
- Input A u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.7 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.82660868773297,
-36.54216898478104, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.9 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.82660868773297,
-36.54216898478104, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.82660868773297,
-36.54216898478104, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-9.82660868773297,
-36.54216898478104, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.7 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.7 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.3861023076023695,
-37.11250254450316, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.6 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.3861023076023695,
-37.11250254450316, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.3861023076023695,
-37.11250254450316, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-7.3861023076023695,
-37.11250254450316, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.913194953573758,
-37.52003288594374, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.913194953573758,
-37.52003288594374, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-4.913194953573758,
-37.52003288594374, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-4.913194953573758,
-37.52003288594374, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.3 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.418734648500489,
-37.76297227595129, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.3 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.418734648500489,
-37.76297227595129, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.418734648500489,
-37.76297227595129, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (-2.418734648500489,
-37.76297227595129, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.3 %
- Input A u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.3 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.9 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.08633603738643585,
-37.84025500049876, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.1 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.08633603738643585,
-37.84025500049876, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+17.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- A position
- (0.08633603738643585,
-37.84025500049876, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (0.08633603738643585,
-37.84025500049876, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.9 %
- Input A u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.1 %
- Input B u2
- 2.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.5910279887829195,
-37.75154203970305, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.5910279887829195,
-37.75154203970305, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- A position
- (2.5910279887829195,
-37.75154203970305, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (2.5910279887829195,
-37.75154203970305, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.5 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.084353751797858,
-37.497222555020016, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.3 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.084353751797858,
-37.497222555020016, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- A position
- (5.084353751797858,
-37.497222555020016, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (5.084353751797858,
-37.497222555020016, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.6 %
- Input A u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.555375733151027,
-37.078412182091014, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.8 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.555375733151027,
-37.078412182091014, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- A position
- (7.555375733151027,
-37.078412182091014, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (7.555375733151027,
-37.078412182091014, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.9 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.8 %
- Input B u2
- 8.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.4 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.993254180644998,
-36.49694813672979, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (9.993254180644998,
-36.49694813672979, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (9.993254180644998,
-36.49694813672979, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (9.993254180644998,
-36.49694813672979, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.387294734432842,
-35.755381155518606, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.3 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.387294734432842,
-35.755381155518606, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.7 percentage points
- A position
- (12.387294734432842,
-35.755381155518606, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (12.387294734432842,
-35.755381155518606, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.0 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.72699534048611,
-34.85696430636815, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 12.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.72699534048611,
-34.85696430636815, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.8 percentage points
- A position
- (14.72699534048611,
-34.85696430636815, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (14.72699534048611,
-34.85696430636815, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.0 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.9 %
- Input B u2
- 12.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.3 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.00209232046557,
-33.805638718126424, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.00209232046557,
-33.805638718126424, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (17.00209232046557,
-33.805638718126424, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (17.00209232046557,
-33.805638718126424, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.202605395897713,
-32.60601629183735, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.6 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.202605395897713,
-32.60601629183735, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (19.202605395897713,
-32.60601629183735, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (19.202605395897713,
-32.60601629183735, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.6 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.7 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.318881469147254,
-31.263359469490357, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.318881469147254,
-31.263359469490357, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (21.318881469147254,
-31.263359469490357, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (21.318881469147254,
-31.263359469490357, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.3 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.341636969129677,
-29.78355814901036, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.8 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.341636969129677,
-29.78355814901036, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (23.341636969129677,
-29.78355814901036, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (23.341636969129677,
-29.78355814901036, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.8 %
- Input B u2
- 9.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.2 %
- u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.261998576003517,
-28.173103846756376, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.3 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.261998576003517,
-28.173103846756376, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (25.261998576003517,
-28.173103846756376, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (25.261998576003517,
-28.173103846756376, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.2 %
- Input A u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.3 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.071542146193767,
-26.439061220871235, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.071542146193767,
-26.439061220871235, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.5 percentage points
- A position
- (27.071542146193767,
-26.439061220871235, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (27.071542146193767,
-26.439061220871235, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.762329666991768,
-24.589037080402477, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.2 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.762329666991768,
-24.589037080402477, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (28.762329666991768,
-24.589037080402477, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (28.762329666991768,
-24.589037080402477, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.6 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.32694407862136,
-22.63114701614338, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.32694407862136,
-22.63114701614338, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 16.6 percentage points
- A position
- (30.32694407862136,
-22.63114701614338, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (30.32694407862136,
-22.63114701614338, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.6 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.4 %
- Input B u2
- 11.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.75852181101534,
-20.57397979957659, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.75852181101534,
-20.57397979957659, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (31.75852181101534,
-20.57397979957659, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (31.75852181101534,
-20.57397979957659, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.3 %
- u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.050782892571846,
-18.426559706092807, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.050782892571846,
-18.426559706092807, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (33.050782892571846,
-18.426559706092807, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (33.050782892571846,
-18.426559706092807, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.3 %
- Input A u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.4 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.19805849881089,
-16.1983069277635, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.9 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.19805849881089,
-16.1983069277635, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 1.6 percentage points
- A position
- (34.19805849881089,
-16.1983069277635, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (34.19805849881089,
-16.1983069277635, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.9 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-042
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.6 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.195315820082214,
-13.898996249326538, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.4 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.195315820082214,
-13.898996249326538, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- A position
- (35.195315820082214,
-13.898996249326538, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (35.195315820082214,
-13.898996249326538, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.6 %
- Input A u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.4 %
- Input B u2
- 11.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-043
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.1 %
- u2
- 14.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.0381801392359,
-11.538714168663065, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.0381801392359,
-11.538714168663065, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 19.3 percentage points
- A position
- (36.0381801392359,
-11.538714168663065, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (36.0381801392359,
-11.538714168663065, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.1 %
- Input A u2
- 14.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 9.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-044
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.5 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.72295402240667,
-9.127814649867092, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.72295402240667,
-9.127814649867092, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- A position
- (36.72295402240667,
-9.127814649867092, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (36.72295402240667,
-9.127814649867092, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.1 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-045
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.3 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.24663353872672,
-6.676873703008048, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.24663353872672,
-6.676873703008048, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- A position
- (37.24663353872672,
-6.676873703008048, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (37.24663353872672,
-6.676873703008048, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 10.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-046
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.60692143781518,
-4.196642989833597, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.60692143781518,
-4.196642989833597, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (37.60692143781518,
-4.196642989833597, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (37.60692143781518,
-4.196642989833597, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.3 %
- Input B u2
- 8.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-13-047
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.80223722723803,
-1.6980026589324815, 11.113919097989255) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.9 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.80223722723803,
-1.6980026589324815, 12.268496562777987) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−4.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- A position
- (37.80223722723803,
-1.6980026589324815, 11.113919097989255) m - B position
- (37.80223722723803,
-1.6980026589324815, 12.268496562777987) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.9 %
- Input B u2
- 6.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.8 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.050904272314625,
-0.8368663575178914, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.050904272314625,
-0.8368663575178914, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-40.050904272314625,
-0.8368663575178914, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-40.050904272314625,
-0.8368663575178914, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.0 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.9208466337044,
-3.331858697289959, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.9208466337044,
-3.331858697289959, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-39.9208466337044,
-3.331858697289959, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-39.9208466337044,
-3.331858697289959, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.0 %
- Input A u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.5 %
- Input B u2
- 8.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.3 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.63551366999212,
-5.813891506239393, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.2 %
- u2
- 15.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.63551366999212,
-5.813891506239393, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-39.63551366999212,
-5.813891506239393, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-39.63551366999212,
-5.813891506239393, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.3 %
- Input A u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.2 %
- Input B u2
- 15.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.7 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.19601520655572,
-8.273310719289336, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.19601520655572,
-8.273310719289336, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-39.19601520655572,
-8.273310719289336, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-39.19601520655572,
-8.273310719289336, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.7 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.60406070781156,
-10.700550228752466, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.60406070781156,
-10.700550228752466, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-38.60406070781156,
-10.700550228752466, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-38.60406070781156,
-10.700550228752466, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.6 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.861952628115944,
-13.086169092471613, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.861952628115944,
-13.086169092471613, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.861952628115944,
-13.086169092471613, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-37.861952628115944,
-13.086169092471613, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.6 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.0 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.9725774561847,
-15.420888255119346, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.9725774561847,
-15.420888255119346, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-36.9725774561847,
-15.420888255119346, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-36.9725774561847,
-15.420888255119346, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.5 %
- Input B u2
- 6.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.8 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.93939448786462,
-17.69562663982548, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.93939448786462,
-17.69562663982548, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.93939448786462,
-17.69562663982548, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-35.93939448786462,
-17.69562663982548, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.9 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.76642237092555,
-19.90153646975184, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.5 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.76642237092555,
-19.90153646975184, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-34.76642237092555,
-19.90153646975184, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-34.76642237092555,
-19.90153646975184, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.3 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.45822347420864,
-22.030037682227626, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.5 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.45822347420864,
-22.030037682227626, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-33.45822347420864,
-22.030037682227626, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-33.45822347420864,
-22.030037682227626, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.3 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.01988614192787,
-24.072851301589317, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.9 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.01988614192787,
-24.072851301589317, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.01988614192787,
-24.072851301589317, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-32.01988614192787,
-24.072851301589317, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.9 %
- Input B u2
- 6.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.0 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.45700490214838,
-26.022031640918517, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 15.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.45700490214838,
-26.022031640918517, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 19.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.45700490214838,
-26.022031640918517, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-30.45700490214838,
-26.022031640918517, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.0 %
- Input B u2
- 15.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.775658706422195,
-27.869997207426543, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.775658706422195,
-27.869997207426543, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-28.775658706422195,
-27.869997207426543, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-28.775658706422195,
-27.869997207426543, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.982387285220124,
-29.609560191276845, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.982387285220124,
-29.609560191276845, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-26.982387285220124,
-29.609560191276845, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-26.982387285220124,
-29.609560191276845, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.3 %
- Input A u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 12.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.6 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.084165711127145,
-31.233954423146105, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.084165711127145,
-31.233954423146105, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.084165711127145,
-31.233954423146105, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-25.084165711127145,
-31.233954423146105, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.6 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.2 %
- u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.08837726873981,
-32.73686169178093, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.5 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.08837726873981,
-32.73686169178093, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.08837726873981,
-32.73686169178093, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-23.08837726873981,
-32.73686169178093, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.2 %
- Input A u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.002784736790524,
-34.11243631918562, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.002784736790524,
-34.11243631918562, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.002784736790524,
-34.11243631918562, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-21.002784736790524,
-34.11243631918562, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.5 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.835500194198836,
-35.35532789785424, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.0 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.835500194198836,
-35.35532789785424, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.835500194198836,
-35.35532789785424, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-18.835500194198836,
-35.35532789785424, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.594953467491937,
-36.46070210160841, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.5 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.594953467491937,
-36.46070210160841, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.594953467491937,
-36.46070210160841, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-16.594953467491937,
-36.46070210160841, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.3 %
- u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.289859342320211,
-37.424259489095554, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.9 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.289859342320211,
-37.424259489095554, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.289859342320211,
-37.424259489095554, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-14.289859342320211,
-37.424259489095554, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.3 %
- Input A u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.7 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.929183666601713,
-38.24225222680978, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.4 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.929183666601713,
-38.24225222680978, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-11.929183666601713,
-38.24225222680978, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-11.929183666601713,
-38.24225222680978, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.4 %
- Input B u2
- 8.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.4 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.522108477139687,
-38.91149866659005, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.2 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.522108477139687,
-38.91149866659005, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.522108477139687,
-38.91149866659005, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-9.522108477139687,
-38.91149866659005, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.4 %
- Input A u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.7 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.0779962853562575,
-39.429395720895066, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.0779962853562575,
-39.429395720895066, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.0779962853562575,
-39.429395720895066, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-7.0779962853562575,
-39.429395720895066, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.7 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.606353661055598,
-39.793928987720406, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.0 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.606353661055598,
-39.793928987720406, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-4.606353661055598,
-39.793928987720406, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-4.606353661055598,
-39.793928987720406, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.0 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.116794255860528,
-40.00368058577624, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.116794255860528,
-40.00368058577624, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.116794255860528,
-40.00368058577624, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (-2.116794255860528,
-40.00368058577624, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.5 %
- Input B u2
- 8.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.8 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.3809985898541988,
-40.057834669449925, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.3809985898541988,
-40.057834669449925, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- A position
- (0.3809985898541988,
-40.057834669449925, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (0.3809985898541988,
-40.057834669449925, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.5 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.8773095110885696,
-39.956180602102776, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.1 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.8773095110885696,
-39.956180602102776, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (2.8773095110885696,
-39.956180602102776, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (2.8773095110885696,
-39.956180602102776, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.1 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.4 %
- u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.3624289069063344,
-39.699113775358136, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.3624289069063344,
-39.699113775358136, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (5.3624289069063344,
-39.699113775358136, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (5.3624289069063344,
-39.699113775358136, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.4 %
- Input A u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.0 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.826690706704238,
-39.287634071194006, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.9 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.826690706704238,
-39.287634071194006, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (7.826690706704238,
-39.287634071194006, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (7.826690706704238,
-39.287634071194006, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.1 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.260509967166549,
-38.72334197282217, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.260509967166549,
-38.72334197282217, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.6 percentage points
- A position
- (10.260509967166549,
-38.72334197282217, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (10.260509967166549,
-38.72334197282217, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.1 %
- Input A u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 6.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.1 %
- u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.654420153668498,
-38.00843233948071, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.654420153668498,
-38.00843233948071, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- A position
- (12.654420153668498,
-38.00843233948071, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (12.654420153668498,
-38.00843233948071, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.1 %
- Input A u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.4 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.99910996111967,
-37.1456858693536, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.99910996111967,
-37.1456858693536, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- A position
- (14.99910996111967,
-37.1456858693536, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (14.99910996111967,
-37.1456858693536, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.4 %
- Input A u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.8 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.28545953102969,
-36.13845828382265, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.5 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.28545953102969,
-36.13845828382265, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (17.28545953102969,
-36.13845828382265, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (17.28545953102969,
-36.13845828382265, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.5 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.504575923927053,
-34.99066727512095, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.504575923927053,
-34.99066727512095, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.2 percentage points
- A position
- (19.504575923927053,
-34.99066727512095, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (19.504575923927053,
-34.99066727512095, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.5 %
- Input A u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 11.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.2 %
- u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.64782770915827,
-33.70677726815565, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.1 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.64782770915827,
-33.70677726815565, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.1 percentage points
- A position
- (21.64782770915827,
-33.70677726815565, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (21.64782770915827,
-33.70677726815565, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.2 %
- Input A u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.1 %
- Input B u2
- 5.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.706878537527658,
-32.29178205577025, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.3 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (23.706878537527658,
-32.29178205577025, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (23.706878537527658,
-32.29178205577025, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (23.706878537527658,
-32.29178205577025, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.8 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.673719566193988,
-30.751185374988115, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.673719566193988,
-30.751185374988115, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (25.673719566193988,
-30.751185374988115, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (25.673719566193988,
-30.751185374988115, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.2 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.540700609705254,
-29.090979499787142, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.540700609705254,
-29.090979499787142, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (27.540700609705254,
-29.090979499787142, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (27.540700609705254,
-29.090979499787142, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.4 %
- u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.300559896006575,
-27.317621933671056, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.3 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.300559896006575,
-27.317621933671056, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- A position
- (29.300559896006575,
-27.317621933671056, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (29.300559896006575,
-27.317621933671056, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 72.4 %
- Input A u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.3 %
- Input B u2
- 8.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.946452311683387,
-25.43801029269311, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 14.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.946452311683387,
-25.43801029269311, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−10.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (30.946452311683387,
-25.43801029269311, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (30.946452311683387,
-25.43801029269311, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.7 %
- Input A u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.8 %
- Input B u2
- 14.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.1 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.4719760265773,
-23.45945547662699, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.4719760265773,
-23.45945547662699, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+18.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.6 percentage points
- A position
- (32.4719760265773,
-23.45945547662699, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (32.4719760265773,
-23.45945547662699, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.1 %
- Input A u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.2 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.87119739421649,
-21.38965323263744, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.87119739421649,
-21.38965323263744, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- A position
- (33.87119739421649,
-21.38965323263744, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (33.87119739421649,
-21.38965323263744, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-042
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.0 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.138674031208026,
-19.236654222056433, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.138674031208026,
-19.236654222056433, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (35.138674031208026,
-19.236654222056433, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (35.138674031208026,
-19.236654222056433, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.0 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-043
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.0 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.269475985823355,
-17.008832706692065, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.269475985823355,
-17.008832706692065, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.0 percentage points
- A position
- (36.269475985823355,
-17.008832706692065, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (36.269475985823355,
-17.008832706692065, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.0 %
- Input A u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.1 %
- Input B u2
- 9.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-044
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.259204913439675,
-14.714853976467717, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.259204913439675,
-14.714853976467717, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.5 percentage points
- A position
- (37.259204913439675,
-14.714853976467717, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (37.259204913439675,
-14.714853976467717, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-045
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.9 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.104011184253054,
-12.363640645083992, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.3 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.104011184253054,
-12.363640645083992, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (38.104011184253054,
-12.363640645083992, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (38.104011184253054,
-12.363640645083992, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-046
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.3 %
- u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.80060885672143,
-9.964337944799201, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.80060885672143,
-9.964337944799201, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- A position
- (38.80060885672143,
-9.964337944799201, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (38.80060885672143,
-9.964337944799201, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-047
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.0 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.346288458496915,
-7.526278155317344, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.0 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.346288458496915,
-7.526278155317344, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (39.346288458496915,
-7.526278155317344, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (39.346288458496915,
-7.526278155317344, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.0 %
- Input A u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-048
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.9 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.738927525135196,
-5.058944305139856, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.9 %
- u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.738927525135196,
-5.058944305139856, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.7 percentage points
- A position
- (39.738927525135196,
-5.058944305139856, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (39.738927525135196,
-5.058944305139856, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.9 %
- Input B u2
- 10.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-049
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.97699885559067,
-2.5719332865680995, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.97699885559067,
-2.5719332865680995, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (39.97699885559067,
-2.5719332865680995, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (39.97699885559067,
-2.5719332865680995, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.3 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-14-050
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.4 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.059576452387056,
-0.07491852782325245, 12.286080902010745) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.059576452387056,
-0.07491852782325245, 13.440658366799477) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- A position
- (40.059576452387056,
-0.07491852782325245, 12.286080902010745) m - B position
- (40.059576452387056,
-0.07491852782325245, 13.440658366799477) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.4 %
- Input A u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.9 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.27850768640781,
0.19108907726113508, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.9 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.27850768640781,
0.19108907726113508, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-42.27850768640781,
0.19108907726113508, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-42.27850768640781,
0.19108907726113508, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.9 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.1 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.216359392028664,
-2.29950579650627, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.216359392028664,
-2.29950579650627, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-42.216359392028664,
-2.29950579650627, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-42.216359392028664,
-2.29950579650627, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.9 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.007619485267384,
-4.782115892162875, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.007619485267384,
-4.782115892162875, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-42.007619485267384,
-4.782115892162875, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-42.007619485267384,
-4.782115892162875, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.9 %
- Input A u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.1 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.65301279223265,
-7.2481206222852, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.65301279223265,
-7.2481206222852, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-41.65301279223265,
-7.2481206222852, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-41.65301279223265,
-7.2481206222852, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.2 %
- Input A u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.8 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.15377064522412,
-9.68895705973467, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.15377064522412,
-9.68895705973467, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-41.15377064522412,
-9.68895705973467, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-41.15377064522412,
-9.68895705973467, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 74.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.3 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.3 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.51162660706798,
-12.096149671469604, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 13.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.51162660706798,
-12.096149671469604, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-40.51162660706798,
-12.096149671469604, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-40.51162660706798,
-12.096149671469604, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.3 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.8 %
- Input B u2
- 13.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.5 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.72881045151287,
-14.461339748890996, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 14.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.72881045151287,
-14.461339748890996, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-39.72881045151287,
-14.461339748890996, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-39.72881045151287,
-14.461339748890996, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.5 %
- Input A u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 14.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.8 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.8080404205885,
-16.77631443252845, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.7 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.8080404205885,
-16.77631443252845, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-38.8080404205885,
-16.77631443252845, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-38.8080404205885,
-16.77631443252845, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.7 %
- Input B u2
- 9.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.2 %
- u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.75251378581261,
-19.03303523028111, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.0 %
- u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.75251378581261,
-19.03303523028111, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.75251378581261,
-19.03303523028111, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-37.75251378581261,
-19.03303523028111, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.2 %
- Input A u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.0 %
- Input B u2
- 12.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.9 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.565895746021205,
-21.223665930187494, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
74.2 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.565895746021205,
-21.223665930187494, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-36.565895746021205,
-21.223665930187494, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-36.565895746021205,
-21.223665930187494, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 71.9 %
- Input A u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 74.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.7 %
- u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.25230670037328,
-23.340599810799848, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.25230670037328,
-23.340599810799848, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.25230670037328,
-23.340599810799848, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-35.25230670037328,
-23.340599810799848, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.8 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.81630794072304,
-25.376486054678345, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.81630794072304,
-25.376486054678345, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-33.81630794072304,
-25.376486054678345, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-33.81630794072304,
-25.376486054678345, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.8 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.4 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.262885813041265,
-27.324255273287015, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.9 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.262885813041265,
-27.324255273287015, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.262885813041265,
-27.324255273287015, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-32.262885813041265,
-27.324255273287015, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.9 %
- Input B u2
- 8.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.59743440288359,
-29.177144054659095, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.9 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.59743440288359,
-29.177144054659095, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.59743440288359,
-29.177144054659095, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-30.59743440288359,
-29.177144054659095, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.1 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.8257368050283,
-30.928718448592885, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
74.5 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.8257368050283,
-30.928718448592885, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−4.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-28.8257368050283,
-30.928718448592885, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-28.8257368050283,
-30.928718448592885, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.2 %
- Input A u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 74.5 %
- Input B u2
- 6.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.6 %
- u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.953945042323024,
-32.572896307828124, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.953945042323024,
-32.572896307828124, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-26.953945042323024,
-32.572896307828124, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-26.953945042323024,
-32.572896307828124, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.6 %
- Input A u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.0 %
- Input B u2
- 12.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.4 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.98855870346963,
-34.1039684076259, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.98855870346963,
-34.1039684076259, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-24.98855870346963,
-34.1039684076259, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-24.98855870346963,
-34.1039684076259, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 8.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.1 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.936402373925382,
-35.5166182704165, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.936402373925382,
-35.5166182704165, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-22.936402373925382,
-35.5166182704165, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-22.936402373925382,
-35.5166182704165, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.6 %
- Input B u2
- 11.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.9 %
- u2
- 12.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.804601938289096,
-36.80594062667643, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.804601938289096,
-36.80594062667643, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-20.804601938289096,
-36.80594062667643, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-20.804601938289096,
-36.80594062667643, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.9 %
- Input A u2
- 12.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.4 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.600559836459347,
-37.96745844793128, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.4 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.600559836459347,
-37.96745844793128, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.600559836459347,
-37.96745844793128, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-18.600559836459347,
-37.96745844793128, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.331929359485347,
-38.9971384927391, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.3 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.331929359485347,
-38.9971384927391, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.331929359485347,
-38.9971384927391, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-16.331929359485347,
-38.9971384927391, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.3 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.006588074365004,
-39.8914053116727, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.6 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.006588074365004,
-39.8914053116727, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.006588074365004,
-39.8914053116727, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-14.006588074365004,
-39.8914053116727, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.6 %
- Input B u2
- 2.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.1 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.632610470069755,
-40.647153662670114, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.632610470069755,
-40.647153662670114, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-11.632610470069755,
-40.647153662670114, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-11.632610470069755,
-40.647153662670114, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.1 %
- Input A u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.5 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.218239919779663,
-41.26175929364226, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.8 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.218239919779663,
-41.26175929364226, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.218239919779663,
-41.26175929364226, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-9.218239919779663,
-41.26175929364226, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.8 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.771860056686992,
-41.73308805489644, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.7 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.771860056686992,
-41.73308805489644, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-6.771860056686992,
-41.73308805489644, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-6.771860056686992,
-41.73308805489644, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.301965662762387,
-42.05950330973377, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.301965662762387,
-42.05950330973377, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-4.301965662762387,
-42.05950330973377, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-4.301965662762387,
-42.05950330973377, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.5 %
- Input A u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 10.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.7 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.8171331715693475,
-42.239871617488085, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.8171331715693475,
-42.239871617488085, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-1.8171331715693475,
-42.239871617488085, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (-1.8171331715693475,
-42.239871617488085, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.7 %
- Input A u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.1 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.6740091124473556,
-42.27356666927255, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.6740091124473556,
-42.27356666927255, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.3 percentage points
- A position
- (0.6740091124473556,
-42.27356666927255, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (0.6740091124473556,
-42.27356666927255, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.1 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 9.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.2 %
- u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.162810974789219,
-42.16047146276766, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.1 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.162810974789219,
-42.16047146276766, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.1 percentage points
- A position
- (3.162810974789219,
-42.16047146276766, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (3.162810974789219,
-42.16047146276766, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.2 %
- Input A u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.1 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.8 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.640630327811688,
-41.90097870849873, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.2 %
- u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.640630327811688,
-41.90097870849873, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.4 percentage points
- A position
- (5.640630327811688,
-41.90097870849873, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (5.640630327811688,
-41.90097870849873, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.2 %
- Input B u2
- 10.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.2 %
- u2
- 15.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.098863219412237,
-41.49598946619233, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.098863219412237,
-41.49598946619233, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.2 percentage points
- A position
- (8.098863219412237,
-41.49598946619233, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (8.098863219412237,
-41.49598946619233, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 74.2 %
- Input A u2
- 15.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.8 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.52897370929712,
-40.946910015946536, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.52897370929712,
-40.946910015946536, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- A position
- (10.52897370929712,
-40.946910015946536, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (10.52897370929712,
-40.946910015946536, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.922523509084533,
-40.25564697507979, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.9 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.922523509084533,
-40.25564697507979, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (12.922523509084533,
-40.25564697507979, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (12.922523509084533,
-40.25564697507979, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.3 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.271201283322524,
-39.424600677614244, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.7 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.271201283322524,
-39.424600677614244, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (15.271201283322524,
-39.424600677614244, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (15.271201283322524,
-39.424600677614244, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.3 %
- Input A u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.7 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.56685150967687,
-38.45665683938291, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.5 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.56685150967687,
-38.45665683938291, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- A position
- (17.56685150967687,
-38.45665683938291, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (17.56685150967687,
-38.45665683938291, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.5 %
- u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.80150279807524,
-37.35517653770239, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.80150279807524,
-37.35517653770239, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.0 percentage points
- A position
- (19.80150279807524,
-37.35517653770239, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (19.80150279807524,
-37.35517653770239, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 72.5 %
- Input A u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.2 %
- Input B u2
- 11.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.8 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.96739557047265,
-36.12398454040572, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.96739557047265,
-36.12398454040572, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (21.96739557047265,
-36.12398454040572, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (21.96739557047265,
-36.12398454040572, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.7 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.0570090051231,
-34.76735602476148, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.1 %
- u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.0570090051231,
-34.76735602476148, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.6 percentage points
- A position
- (24.0570090051231,
-34.76735602476148, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (24.0570090051231,
-34.76735602476148, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.1 %
- Input B u2
- 9.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.5 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.06308715179659,
-33.29000173239629, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.06308715179659,
-33.29000173239629, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- A position
- (26.06308715179659,
-33.29000173239629, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (26.06308715179659,
-33.29000173239629, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.97866412725919,
-31.697051611768444, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.97866412725919,
-31.697051611768444, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (27.97866412725919,
-31.697051611768444, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (27.97866412725919,
-31.697051611768444, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.5 %
- Input B u2
- 9.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.7 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.797088303527843,
-29.99403700499246, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.5 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.797088303527843,
-29.99403700499246, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- A position
- (29.797088303527843,
-29.99403700499246, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (29.797088303527843,
-29.99403700499246, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.5 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.5 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.512045404908665,
-28.186871440868845, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.0 %
- u2
- 14.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.512045404908665,
-28.186871440868845, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 29.4 percentage points
- A position
- (31.512045404908665,
-28.186871440868845, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (31.512045404908665,
-28.186871440868845, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.0 %
- Input B u2
- 14.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-042
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.7 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.11758043361694,
-26.281830100813092, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.11758043361694,
-26.281830100813092, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (33.11758043361694,
-26.281830100813092, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (33.11758043361694,
-26.281830100813092, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-043
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.3 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.608118347844645,
-24.28552802898615, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.608118347844645,
-24.28552802898615, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (34.608118347844645,
-24.28552802898615, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (34.608118347844645,
-24.28552802898615, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 70.3 %
- Input A u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.2 %
- Input B u2
- 12.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-044
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.9 %
- u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.97848342047291,
-22.204897162289413, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.97848342047291,
-22.204897162289413, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.6 percentage points
- A position
- (35.97848342047291,
-22.204897162289413, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (35.97848342047291,
-22.204897162289413, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.9 %
- Input A u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-045
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
63.0 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.22391721120892,
-20.047162259984763, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.3 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.22391721120892,
-20.047162259984763, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+24.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (37.22391721120892,
-20.047162259984763, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (37.22391721120892,
-20.047162259984763, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 63.0 %
- Input A u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.3 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-046
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.34009508974041,
-17.819815816521675, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.34009508974041,
-17.819815816521675, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- A position
- (38.34009508974041,
-17.819815816521675, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (38.34009508974041,
-17.819815816521675, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-047
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.5 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.32314125253351,
-15.530592044683617, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.32314125253351,
-15.530592044683617, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 16.5 percentage points
- A position
- (39.32314125253351,
-15.530592044683617, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (39.32314125253351,
-15.530592044683617, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.5 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 12.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-048
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.7 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.169642181129376,
-13.187440019394382, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.9 %
- u2
- 3.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.169642181129376,
-13.187440019394382, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- A position
- (40.169642181129376,
-13.187440019394382, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (40.169642181129376,
-13.187440019394382, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-049
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.3 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.87665849520737,
-10.798496075439568, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.5 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.87665849520737,
-10.798496075439568, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+17.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (40.87665849520737,
-10.798496075439568, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (40.87665849520737,
-10.798496075439568, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.3 %
- Input A u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.5 %
- Input B u2
- 3.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-050
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.0 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.44173515925629,
-8.372055554949098, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.44173515925629,
-8.372055554949098, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- A position
- (41.44173515925629,
-8.372055554949098, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (41.44173515925629,
-8.372055554949098, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-051
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.5 %
- u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.862910007412104,
-5.916544002744215, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.862910007412104,
-5.916544002744215, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.9 percentage points
- A position
- (41.862910007412104,
-5.916544002744215, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (41.862910007412104,
-5.916544002744215, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.5 %
- Input A u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.3 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-052
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.3 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.13872055686068,
-3.4404879095703174, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.8 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.13872055686068,
-3.4404879095703174, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- A position
- (42.13872055686068,
-3.4404879095703174, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (42.13872055686068,
-3.4404879095703174, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.8 %
- Input B u2
- 10.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-15-053
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.8 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.268209086146705,
-0.9524851048062117, 13.45824270603223) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.7 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.268209086146705,
-0.9524851048062117, 14.612820170820964) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (42.268209086146705,
-0.9524851048062117, 13.45824270603223) m - B position
- (42.268209086146705,
-0.9524851048062117, 14.612820170820964) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.7 %
- Input B u2
- 8.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.8 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.48006435935279,
-1.2714455103823286, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.48006435935279,
-1.2714455103823286, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-44.48006435935279,
-1.2714455103823286, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-44.48006435935279,
-1.2714455103823286, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 70.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.33972119650143,
-3.75257555747499, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.4 %
- u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.33972119650143,
-3.75257555747499, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-44.33972119650143,
-3.75257555747499, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-44.33972119650143,
-3.75257555747499, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.4 %
- Input B u2
- 9.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.5 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.06108706990601,
-6.222001712969755, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.06108706990601,
-6.222001712969755, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-44.06108706990601,
-6.222001712969755, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-44.06108706990601,
-6.222001712969755, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.7 %
- u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.64503101033304,
-8.672022094362076, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.64503101033304,
-8.672022094362076, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 19.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-43.64503101033304,
-8.672022094362076, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-43.64503101033304,
-8.672022094362076, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.7 %
- Input A u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.3 %
- Input B u2
- 9.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.3 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.092850653218605,
-11.094995343731973, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.1 %
- u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.092850653218605,
-11.094995343731973, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-43.092850653218605,
-11.094995343731973, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-43.092850653218605,
-11.094995343731973, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.1 %
- Input B u2
- 9.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.7 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.406268191478766,
-13.48336446034199, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.8 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.406268191478766,
-13.48336446034199, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-42.406268191478766,
-13.48336446034199, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-42.406268191478766,
-13.48336446034199, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.7 %
- Input A u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.7 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.587425004169646,
-15.829680370133893, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.8 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.587425004169646,
-15.829680370133893, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 16.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-41.587425004169646,
-15.829680370133893, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-41.587425004169646,
-15.829680370133893, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 71.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.8 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.2 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.638874977749545,
-18.12662515861349, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.638874977749545,
-18.12662515861349, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-40.638874977749545,
-18.12662515861349, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-40.638874977749545,
-18.12662515861349, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 69.2 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.3 %
- Input B u2
- 8.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.9 %
- u2
- 14.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.563576540773546,
-20.36703489466226, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.4 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.563576540773546,
-20.36703489466226, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-39.563576540773546,
-20.36703489466226, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-39.563576540773546,
-20.36703489466226, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.9 %
- Input A u2
- 14.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.4 %
- Input B u2
- 8.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.8 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.36488343686361,
-22.543921974091052, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.0 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.36488343686361,
-22.543921974091052, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-38.36488343686361,
-22.543921974091052, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-38.36488343686361,
-22.543921974091052, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 72.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.0 %
- Input B u2
- 8.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.2 %
- u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.04653426473214,
-24.650496913248315, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.04653426473214,
-24.650496913248315, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.04653426473214,
-24.650496913248315, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-37.04653426473214,
-24.650496913248315, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 69.2 %
- Input A u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.6 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.61264081788267,
-26.68018952471129, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.61264081788267,
-26.68018952471129, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.61264081788267,
-26.68018952471129, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-35.61264081788267,
-26.68018952471129, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.6 %
- Input A u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.06767526035506,
-28.62666940901489, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.9 %
- u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.06767526035506,
-28.62666940901489, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-34.06767526035506,
-28.62666940901489, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-34.06767526035506,
-28.62666940901489, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.9 %
- Input B u2
- 10.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.2 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.41645617851241,
-30.483865698507167, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.41645617851241,
-30.483865698507167, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.41645617851241,
-30.483865698507167, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-32.41645617851241,
-30.483865698507167, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 69.2 %
- Input A u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.8 %
- u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.664133552373062,
-32.24598599175199, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.0 %
- u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.664133552373062,
-32.24598599175199, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.664133552373062,
-32.24598599175199, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-30.664133552373062,
-32.24598599175199, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.8 %
- Input A u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.0 %
- Input B u2
- 12.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.7 %
- u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.81617269336025,
-33.90753441942478, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-28.81617269336025,
-33.90753441942478, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-28.81617269336025,
-33.90753441942478, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-28.81617269336025,
-33.90753441942478, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.7 %
- Input A u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.7 %
- u2
- 14.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.87833719856615,
-35.46332878535534, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-26.87833719856615,
-35.46332878535534, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-26.87833719856615,
-35.46332878535534, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-26.87833719856615,
-35.46332878535534, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 69.7 %
- Input A u2
- 14.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.5 %
- Input B u2
- 8.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.2 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.856670974693834,
-36.90851672925709, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.0 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.856670974693834,
-36.90851672925709, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-24.856670974693834,
-36.90851672925709, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-24.856670974693834,
-36.90851672925709, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.75747938774296,
-38.23859086073245, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.7 %
- u2
- 14.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.75747938774296,
-38.23859086073245, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-22.75747938774296,
-38.23859086073245, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-22.75747938774296,
-38.23859086073245, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.6 %
- Input A u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.7 %
- Input B u2
- 14.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.587309597231254,
-39.4494028173531, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.587309597231254,
-39.4494028173531, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-20.587309597231254,
-39.4494028173531, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-20.587309597231254,
-39.4494028173531, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.35293013628699,
-40.53717620296961, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.2 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.35293013628699,
-40.53717620296961, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.35293013628699,
-40.53717620296961, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-18.35293013628699,
-40.53717620296961, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.061309801300542,
-41.49851836589693, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.061309801300542,
-41.49851836589693, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.061309801300542,
-41.49851836589693, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-16.061309801300542,
-41.49851836589693, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-13.719595916975548,
-42.330430980240976, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-13.719595916975548,
-42.330430980240976, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-13.719595916975548,
-42.330430980240976, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-13.719595916975548,
-42.330430980240976, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.0 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.33509204456901,
-43.030319397364295, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.33509204456901,
-43.030319397364295, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-11.33509204456901,
-43.030319397364295, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-11.33509204456901,
-43.030319397364295, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 9.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.8 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.915235202845757,
-43.59600073832435, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.915235202845757,
-43.59600073832435, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-8.915235202845757,
-43.59600073832435, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-8.915235202845757,
-43.59600073832435, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.8 %
- Input A u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.8 %
- Input B u2
- 8.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.1 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.46757267279301,
-44.02571070204521, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 10.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.46757267279301,
-44.02571070204521, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-6.46757267279301,
-44.02571070204521, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-6.46757267279301,
-44.02571070204521, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.8 %
- Input B u2
- 10.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.9 %
- u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.99973845843848,
-44.31810906798851, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.99973845843848,
-44.31810906798851, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-3.99973845843848,
-44.31810906798851, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-3.99973845843848,
-44.31810906798851, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.9 %
- Input A u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.0 %
- Input B u2
- 4.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.3 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.5194294771883528,
-44.472283876161434, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.3 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.5194294771883528,
-44.472283876161434, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+24.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-1.5194294771883528,
-44.472283876161434, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (-1.5194294771883528,
-44.472283876161434, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 69.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.3 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.965618446054899,
-44.4877542714248, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.965618446054899,
-44.4877542714248, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+17.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (0.965618446054899,
-44.4877542714248, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (0.965618446054899,
-44.4877542714248, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.3 %
- Input A u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.1 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.9 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.447654706123215,
-44.364472003230055, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.447654706123215,
-44.364472003230055, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+18.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (3.447654706123215,
-44.364472003230055, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (3.447654706123215,
-44.364472003230055, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.9 %
- u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.9189380909117535,
-44.1028215761077, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.9189380909117535,
-44.1028215761077, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.6 percentage points
- A position
- (5.9189380909117535,
-44.1028215761077, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (5.9189380909117535,
-44.1028215761077, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 74.9 %
- Input A u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.8 %
- Input B u2
- 12.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.8 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.37176092541161,
-43.70361905043778, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.5 %
- u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.37176092541161,
-43.70361905043778, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- A position
- (8.37176092541161,
-43.70361905043778, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (8.37176092541161,
-43.70361905043778, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.8 %
- Input A u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.5 %
- Input B u2
- 12.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.4 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.79847311114399,
-43.168109497242725, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.79847311114399,
-43.168109497242725, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- A position
- (10.79847311114399,
-43.168109497242725, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (10.79847311114399,
-43.168109497242725, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.4 %
- Input A u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.7 %
- Input B u2
- 8.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.191505986019035,
-42.49796311494071, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.6 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.191505986019035,
-42.49796311494071, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- A position
- (13.191505986019035,
-42.49796311494071, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (13.191505986019035,
-42.49796311494071, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.6 %
- Input B u2
- 3.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.6 %
- u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.543395930203156,
-41.69527002017113, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.6 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.543395930203156,
-41.69527002017113, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.8 percentage points
- A position
- (15.543395930203156,
-41.69527002017113, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (15.543395930203156,
-41.69527002017113, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.6 %
- Input A u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.6 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.846807644370514,
-40.76253372893883, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.7 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.846807644370514,
-40.76253372893883, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.1 percentage points
- A position
- (17.846807644370514,
-40.76253372893883, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (17.846807644370514,
-40.76253372893883, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.8 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.094557027736162,
-39.70266334840896, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.094557027736162,
-39.70266334840896, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (20.094557027736162,
-39.70266334840896, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (20.094557027736162,
-39.70266334840896, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.5 %
- Input B u2
- 6.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.0 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.279633584516823,
-38.51896450370528, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.279633584516823,
-38.51896450370528, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.5 percentage points
- A position
- (22.279633584516823,
-38.51896450370528, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (22.279633584516823,
-38.51896450370528, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.0 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.39522228893562,
-37.21512902801031, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.5 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.39522228893562,
-37.21512902801031, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (24.39522228893562,
-37.21512902801031, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (24.39522228893562,
-37.21512902801031, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.2 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.434724840576497,
-35.79522344812287, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.5 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.434724840576497,
-35.79522344812287, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- A position
- (26.434724840576497,
-35.79522344812287, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (26.434724840576497,
-35.79522344812287, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.2 %
- Input A u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.5 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.391780243794614,
-34.26367630138528, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.4 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.391780243794614,
-34.26367630138528, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (28.391780243794614,
-34.26367630138528, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (28.391780243794614,
-34.26367630138528, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.3 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.260284646997988,
-32.6252643235376, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.260284646997988,
-32.6252643235376, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- A position
- (30.260284646997988,
-32.6252643235376, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (30.260284646997988,
-32.6252643235376, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.3 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-042
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.8 %
- u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.03441037992381,
-30.88509755057715, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.03441037992381,
-30.88509755057715, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.9 percentage points
- A position
- (32.03441037992381,
-30.88509755057715, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (32.03441037992381,
-30.88509755057715, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.8 %
- Input A u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-043
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.3 %
- u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.70862412953382,
-29.048603381089553, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.8 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (33.70862412953382,
-29.048603381089553, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.4 percentage points
- A position
- (33.70862412953382,
-29.048603381089553, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (33.70862412953382,
-29.048603381089553, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.8 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-044
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.9 %
- u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.27770419784032,
-27.121509648758792, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (35.27770419784032,
-27.121509648758792, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- A position
- (35.27770419784032,
-27.121509648758792, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (35.27770419784032,
-27.121509648758792, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 70.9 %
- Input A u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-045
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.5 %
- u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.736756787837315,
-25.10982675785172, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.736756787837315,
-25.10982675785172, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- A position
- (36.736756787837315,
-25.10982675785172, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (36.736756787837315,
-25.10982675785172, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.5 %
- Input A u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-046
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.5 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.08123126674275,
-23.019828937394216, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.08123126674275,
-23.019828937394216, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+19.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (38.08123126674275,
-23.019828937394216, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (38.08123126674275,
-23.019828937394216, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 70.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-047
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.4 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.30693435894731,
-20.858034672505575, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.30693435894731,
-20.858034672505575, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (39.30693435894731,
-20.858034672505575, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (39.30693435894731,
-20.858034672505575, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.4 %
- Input A u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-048
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.5 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.41004322440349,
-18.63118637392367, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.9 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.41004322440349,
-18.63118637392367, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- A position
- (40.41004322440349,
-18.63118637392367, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (40.41004322440349,
-18.63118637392367, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 74.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.9 %
- Input B u2
- 9.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-049
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.387117381664815,
-16.346229349129278, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.3 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.387117381664815,
-16.346229349129278, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- A position
- (41.387117381664815,
-16.346229349129278, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (41.387117381664815,
-16.346229349129278, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.6 %
- Input A u2
- 1.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.3 %
- Input B u2
- 8.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-050
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.7 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.23510943838847,
-14.010290140656844, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.4 %
- u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.23510943838847,
-14.010290140656844, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- A position
- (42.23510943838847,
-14.010290140656844, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (42.23510943838847,
-14.010290140656844, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 70.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.4 %
- Input B u2
- 11.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-051
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.4 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.95137459583401,
-11.630654299151956, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.1 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.95137459583401,
-11.630654299151956, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- A position
- (42.95137459583401,
-11.630654299151956, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (42.95137459583401,
-11.630654299151956, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.1 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-052
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.5336788977147,
-9.214743660499028, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.5336788977147,
-9.214743660499028, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- A position
- (43.5336788977147,
-9.214743660499028, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (43.5336788977147,
-9.214743660499028, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.6 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-053
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.980206197674036,
-6.770093197889644, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.980206197674036,
-6.770093197889644, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- A position
- (43.980206197674036,
-6.770093197889644, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (43.980206197674036,
-6.770093197889644, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-054
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.7 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.28956382365673,
-4.304327521027483, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.28956382365673,
-4.304327521027483, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- A position
- (44.28956382365673,
-4.304327521027483, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (44.28956382365673,
-4.304327521027483, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-055
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.9 %
- u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.460786921507534,
-1.8251370957661388, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.1 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.460786921507534,
-1.8251370957661388, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.3 percentage points
- A position
- (44.460786921507534,
-1.8251370957661388, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (44.460786921507534,
-1.8251370957661388, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.9 %
- Input A u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.1 %
- Input B u2
- 3.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-16-056
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
64.3 %
- u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.49334146425069,
0.6597457416513589, 14.630404510053719) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.49334146425069,
0.6597457416513589, 15.784981974842449) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 18.4 percentage points
- A position
- (44.49334146425069,
0.6597457416513589, 14.630404510053719) m - B position
- (44.49334146425069,
0.6597457416513589, 15.784981974842449) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 64.3 %
- Input A u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.1 %
- u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-47.19936300369556,
-0.24521836263894983, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.1 %
- u2
- 14.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-47.19936300369556,
-0.24521836263894983, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 19.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-47.19936300369556,
-0.24521836263894983, 15.45) m - B position
- (-47.19936300369556,
-0.24521836263894983, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 73.1 %
- Input A u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.1 %
- Input B u2
- 14.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.4 %
- u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-47.11986834990403,
-2.749182912742018, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.4 %
- u2
- 11.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-47.11986834990403,
-2.749182912742018, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-47.11986834990403,
-2.749182912742018, 15.45) m - B position
- (-47.11986834990403,
-2.749182912742018, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.4 %
- Input A u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.4 %
- Input B u2
- 11.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
68.2 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.90762999257426,
-5.245402604161897, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.90762999257426,
-5.245402604161897, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-46.90762999257426,
-5.245402604161897, 15.45) m - B position
- (-46.90762999257426,
-5.245402604161897, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 68.2 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.6 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.7 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.56324583884332,
-7.72684521337399, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.4 %
- u2
- 27.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.56324583884332,
-7.72684521337399, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 22.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-46.56324583884332,
-7.72684521337399, 15.45) m - B position
- (-46.56324583884332,
-7.72684521337399, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 70.7 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.4 %
- Input B u2
- 27.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.7 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.08768607028445,
-10.186520146100372, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 13.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.08768607028445,
-10.186520146100372, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-46.08768607028445,
-10.186520146100372, 15.45) m - B position
- (-46.08768607028445,
-10.186520146100372, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 13.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-45.48229040976071,
-12.617498130857394, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-45.48229040976071,
-12.617498130857394, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 18.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-45.48229040976071,
-12.617498130857394, 15.45) m - B position
- (-45.48229040976071,
-12.617498130857394, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 12.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.9 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.74876434722564,
-15.012930739747926, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.74876434722564,
-15.012930739747926, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-44.74876434722564,
-15.012930739747926, 15.45) m - B position
- (-44.74876434722564,
-15.012930739747926, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.9 %
- Input A u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 8.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.4 %
- u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.889174335103505,
-17.36606968150514, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.6 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.889174335103505,
-17.36606968150514, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 18.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-43.889174335103505,
-17.36606968150514, 15.45) m - B position
- (-43.889174335103505,
-17.36606968150514, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.4 %
- Input A u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.6 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.3 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.905941966784326,
-19.670285812436386, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.7 %
- u2
- 13.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-42.905941966784326,
-19.670285812436386, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-42.905941966784326,
-19.670285812436386, 15.45) m - B position
- (-42.905941966784326,
-19.670285812436386, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.3 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.7 %
- Input B u2
- 13.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.7 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.80183715463371,
-21.9190878117107, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.0 %
- u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.80183715463371,
-21.9190878117107, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-41.80183715463371,
-21.9190878117107, 15.45) m - B position
- (-41.80183715463371,
-21.9190878117107, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.0 %
- Input B u2
- 10.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.5 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.5799703267363,
-24.10614046837862, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.9 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.5799703267363,
-24.10614046837862, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-40.5799703267363,
-24.10614046837862, 15.45) m - B position
- (-40.5799703267363,
-24.10614046837862, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 72.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.9 %
- Input B u2
- 6.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.4 %
- u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.24378366435544,
-26.225282528607192, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-39.24378366435544,
-26.225282528607192, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-39.24378366435544,
-26.225282528607192, 15.45) m - B position
- (-39.24378366435544,
-26.225282528607192, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.4 %
- Input A u2
- 12.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
68.5 %
- u2
- 15.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.79704140479471,
-28.27054405285181, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.5 %
- u2
- 17.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.79704140479471,
-28.27054405285181, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 19.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.79704140479471,
-28.27054405285181, 15.45) m - B position
- (-37.79704140479471,
-28.27054405285181, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 68.5 %
- Input A u2
- 15.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.5 %
- Input B u2
- 17.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.2 %
- u2
- 14.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.24381923697949,
-30.23616323406718, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
74.9 %
- u2
- 12.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.24381923697949,
-30.23616323406718, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-36.24381923697949,
-30.23616323406718, 15.45) m - B position
- (-36.24381923697949,
-30.23616323406718, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 72.2 %
- Input A u2
- 14.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 74.9 %
- Input B u2
- 12.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.1 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.58849281963283,
-32.11660262957787, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.3 %
- u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.58849281963283,
-32.11660262957787, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-34.58849281963283,
-32.11660262957787, 15.45) m - B position
- (-34.58849281963283,
-32.11660262957787, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.3 %
- Input B u2
- 10.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
72.8 %
- u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.83572545439157,
-33.90656476088107, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.5 %
- u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.83572545439157,
-33.90656476088107, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 22.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.83572545439157,
-33.90656476088107, 15.45) m - B position
- (-32.83572545439157,
-33.90656476088107, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 72.7 %
- Input A u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.5 %
- Input B u2
- 11.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.5 %
- u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.990454948589434,
-35.601007037434336, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.5 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-30.990454948589434,
-35.601007037434336, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-30.990454948589434,
-35.601007037434336, 15.45) m - B position
- (-30.990454948589434,
-35.601007037434336, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.5 %
- Input A u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.5 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.2 %
- u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.05787970471667,
-37.195155962385954, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 14.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.05787970471667,
-37.195155962385954, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-29.05787970471667,
-37.195155962385954, 15.45) m - B position
- (-29.05787970471667,
-37.195155962385954, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.2 %
- Input A u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.2 %
- Input B u2
- 14.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.5 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.043444075744127,
-38.68452058022821, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.043444075744127,
-38.68452058022821, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-27.043444075744127,
-38.68452058022821, 15.45) m - B position
- (-27.043444075744127,
-38.68452058022821, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.5 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.2 %
- Input B u2
- 9.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.952823027568265,
-40.064905128489436, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.952823027568265,
-40.064905128489436, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-24.952823027568265,
-40.064905128489436, 15.45) m - B position
- (-24.952823027568265,
-40.064905128489436, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
88.3 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.791906151784882,
-41.33242085782335, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-22.791906151784882,
-41.33242085782335, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-22.791906151784882,
-41.33242085782335, 15.45) m - B position
- (-22.791906151784882,
-41.33242085782335, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 88.3 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.566781073830448,
-42.48349698719645, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.4 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-20.566781073830448,
-42.48349698719645, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-20.566781073830448,
-42.48349698719645, 15.45) m - B position
- (-20.566781073830448,
-42.48349698719645, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.9 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.4 %
- Input B u2
- 7.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.5 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.28371630323241,
-43.51489076331128, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-18.28371630323241,
-43.51489076331128, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-18.28371630323241,
-43.51489076331128, 15.45) m - B position
- (-18.28371630323241,
-43.51489076331128, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.949143574282038,
-44.42369659592657, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.949143574282038,
-44.42369659592657, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-15.949143574282038,
-44.42369659592657, 15.45) m - B position
- (-15.949143574282038,
-44.42369659592657, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 83.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.2 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-13.569639726878805,
-45.20735424333869, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.3 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-13.569639726878805,
-45.20735424333869, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-13.569639726878805,
-45.20735424333869, 15.45) m - B position
- (-13.569639726878805,
-45.20735424333869, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 85.2 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.3 %
- u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.151908178590455,
-45.86365602496477, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.8 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-11.151908178590455,
-45.86365602496477, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-11.151908178590455,
-45.86365602496477, 15.45) m - B position
- (-11.151908178590455,
-45.86365602496477, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.1 %
- u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.702760040125085,
-46.390753040708475, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.2 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.702760040125085,
-46.390753040708475, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+19.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-8.702760040125085,
-46.390753040708475, 15.45) m - B position
- (-8.702760040125085,
-46.390753040708475, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.1 %
- Input A u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.229094927415384,
-46.78716037958756, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.229094927415384,
-46.78716037958756, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-6.229094927415384,
-46.78716037958756, 15.45) m - B position
- (-6.229094927415384,
-46.78716037958756, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.2 %
- Input A u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.6 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.7378815243705614,
-47.051761302949856, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-3.7378815243705614,
-47.051761302949856, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-3.7378815243705614,
-47.051761302949856, 15.45) m - B position
- (-3.7378815243705614,
-47.051761302949856, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.2 %
- Input B u2
- 10.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.3 %
- u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.2361379510534638,
-47.18381039049269, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.2361379510534638,
-47.18381039049269, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-1.2361379510534638,
-47.18381039049269, 15.45) m - B position
- (-1.2361379510534638,
-47.18381039049269, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.3 %
- Input A u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.0 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.2690880074114133,
-47.18293564022321, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.2690880074114133,
-47.18293564022321, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- A position
- (1.2690880074114133,
-47.18293564022321, 15.45) m - B position
- (1.2690880074114133,
-47.18293564022321, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.0 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.7707387555007372,
-47.049139516443496, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.4 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (3.7707387555007372,
-47.049139516443496, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- A position
- (3.7707387555007372,
-47.049139516443496, 15.45) m - B position
- (3.7707387555007372,
-47.049139516443496, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.3 %
- Input A u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.4 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.261766769592505,
-46.78279894280832, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.0 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (6.261766769592505,
-46.78279894280832, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- A position
- (6.261766769592505,
-46.78279894280832, 15.45) m - B position
- (6.261766769592505,
-46.78279894280832, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.8 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.735154451892269,
-46.384664240474855, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.7 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.735154451892269,
-46.384664240474855, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+17.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (8.735154451892269,
-46.384664240474855, 15.45) m - B position
- (8.735154451892269,
-46.384664240474855, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.9 %
- u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.183933900053669,
-45.85585701433603, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.183933900053669,
-45.85585701433603, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (11.183933900053669,
-45.85585701433603, 15.45) m - B position
- (11.183933900053669,
-45.85585701433603, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.4 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.601206536799642,
-45.197866993292045, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.8 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.601206536799642,
-45.197866993292045, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (13.601206536799642,
-45.197866993292045, 15.45) m - B position
- (13.601206536799642,
-45.197866993292045, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.8 %
- Input B u2
- 3.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.8 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.980162544244457,
-44.41254783346174, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.6 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.980162544244457,
-44.41254783346174, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.9 percentage points
- A position
- (15.980162544244457,
-44.41254783346174, 15.45) m - B position
- (15.980162544244457,
-44.41254783346174, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.8 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.8 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.314100048167262,
-43.50211189615649, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (18.314100048167262,
-43.50211189615649, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- A position
- (18.314100048167262,
-43.50211189615649, 15.45) m - B position
- (18.314100048167262,
-43.50211189615649, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.7 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.59644399819236,
-42.4691240153282, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (20.59644399819236,
-42.4691240153282, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.5 percentage points
- A position
- (20.59644399819236,
-42.4691240153282, 15.45) m - B position
- (20.59644399819236,
-42.4691240153282, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.0 %
- Input B u2
- 10.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.8 %
- u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.82076469068763,
-41.31649427204909, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.5 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (22.82076469068763,
-41.31649427204909, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- A position
- (22.82076469068763,
-41.31649427204909, 15.45) m - B position
- (22.82076469068763,
-41.31649427204909, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.8 %
- Input A u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.1 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.98079588219956,
-40.04746979637892, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.5 %
- u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.98079588219956,
-40.04746979637892, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- A position
- (24.98079588219956,
-40.04746979637892, 15.45) m - B position
- (24.98079588219956,
-40.04746979637892, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.5 %
- Input B u2
- 9.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.070452442396466,
-38.66562561971487, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (27.070452442396466,
-38.66562561971487, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- A position
- (27.070452442396466,
-38.66562561971487, 15.45) m - B position
- (27.070452442396466,
-38.66562561971487, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.9 %
- Input B u2
- 7.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-042
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.2 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.083847496789165,
-37.17485460339436, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.2 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (29.083847496789165,
-37.17485460339436, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (29.083847496789165,
-37.17485460339436, 15.45) m - B position
- (29.083847496789165,
-37.17485460339436, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.2 %
- Input A u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-043
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.6 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.01530901093518,
-35.579356471923475, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.1 %
- u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (31.01530901093518,
-35.579356471923475, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−1.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (31.01530901093518,
-35.579356471923475, 15.45) m - B position
- (31.01530901093518,
-35.579356471923475, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.1 %
- Input B u2
- 10.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-044
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
68.9 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.85939576940655,
-33.88362598172615, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.85939576940655,
-33.88362598172615, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- A position
- (32.85939576940655,
-33.88362598172615, 15.45) m - B position
- (32.85939576940655,
-33.88362598172615, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 68.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.4 %
- Input B u2
- 8.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-045
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.5 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.61091270450598,
-32.09244025874422, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.3 %
- u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.61091270450598,
-32.09244025874422, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- A position
- (34.61091270450598,
-32.09244025874422, 15.45) m - B position
- (34.61091270450598,
-32.09244025874422, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-046
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.7 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.26492553154809,
-30.210845340560596, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.6 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.26492553154809,
-30.210845340560596, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+23.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- A position
- (36.26492553154809,
-30.210845340560596, 15.45) m - B position
- (36.26492553154809,
-30.210845340560596, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 69.7 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-047
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.3 %
- u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.81677464947606,
-28.244141960957943, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.81677464947606,
-28.244141960957943, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (37.81677464947606,
-28.244141960957943, 15.45) m - B position
- (37.81677464947606,
-28.244141960957943, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.3 %
- Input A u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 11.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-048
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.5 %
- u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.26208826765336,
-26.197870616960397, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.26208826765336,
-26.197870616960397, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.0 percentage points
- A position
- (39.26208826765336,
-26.197870616960397, 15.45) m - B position
- (39.26208826765336,
-26.197870616960397, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.5 %
- Input A u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 9.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-049
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
70.2 %
- u2
- 15.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.59679472185066,
-24.07779596042625, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.6 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.59679472185066,
-24.07779596042625, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+19.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 20.0 percentage points
- A position
- (40.59679472185066,
-24.07779596042625, 15.45) m - B position
- (40.59679472185066,
-24.07779596042625, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 70.2 %
- Input A u2
- 15.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.6 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-050
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.2 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.81713394473181,
-21.889890558163135, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
96.0 %
- u2
- 1.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (41.81713394473181,
-21.889890558163135, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+20.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- A position
- (41.81713394473181,
-21.889890558163135, 15.45) m - B position
- (41.81713394473181,
-21.889890558163135, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.2 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 96.0 %
- Input B u2
- 1.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-051
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.5 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.919668058524834,
-19.640318066315622, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.7 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.919668058524834,
-19.640318066315622, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (42.919668058524834,
-19.640318066315622, 15.45) m - B position
- (42.919668058524834,
-19.640318066315622, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-052
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.3 %
- u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.901291060036854,
-17.335415866425826, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 9.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.901291060036854,
-17.335415866425826, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (43.901291060036854,
-17.335415866425826, 15.45) m - B position
- (43.901291060036854,
-17.335415866425826, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.3 %
- Input A u2
- 7.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.9 %
- Input B u2
- 9.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-053
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.0 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.759237570728814,
-14.98167721208338, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.759237570728814,
-14.98167721208338, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- A position
- (44.759237570728814,
-14.98167721208338, 15.45) m - B position
- (44.759237570728814,
-14.98167721208338, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-054
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (45.49109062719959,
-12.585732936460785, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (45.49109062719959,
-12.585732936460785, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (45.49109062719959,
-12.585732936460785, 15.45) m - B position
- (45.49109062719959,
-12.585732936460785, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.1 %
- Input A u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-055
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.094788490132764,
-10.154332772266455, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.7 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.094788490132764,
-10.154332772266455, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- A position
- (46.094788490132764,
-10.154332772266455, 15.45) m - B position
- (46.094788490132764,
-10.154332772266455, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 86.6 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-056
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.6 %
- u2
- 14.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.56863045252404,
-7.694326336739999, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.1 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.56863045252404,
-7.694326336739999, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 24.8 percentage points
- A position
- (46.56863045252404,
-7.694326336739999, 15.45) m - B position
- (46.56863045252404,
-7.694326336739999, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.6 %
- Input A u2
- 14.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.1 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-057
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.0 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.91128163082679,
-5.212643835257984, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
79.4 %
- u2
- 13.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.91128163082679,
-5.212643835257984, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.9 percentage points
- A position
- (46.91128163082679,
-5.212643835257984, 15.45) m - B position
- (46.91128163082679,
-5.212643835257984, 16.55) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.0 %
- Input A u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 79.4 %
- Input B u2
- 13.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-058
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.1 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (47.12177672551828,
-2.7162765379106735, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 1.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (47.12177672551828,
-2.7162765379106735, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (47.12177672551828,
-2.7162765379106735, 15.45) m - B position
- (47.12177672551828,
-2.7162765379106735, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.1 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.8 %
- Input B u2
- 1.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-17-059
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
64.6 %
- u2
- 14.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (47.199522740492526,
-0.21225708405055588, 15.45) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.6 %
- u2
- 10.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (47.199522740492526,
-0.21225708405055588, 16.55) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+20.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (47.199522740492526,
-0.21225708405055588, 15.45) m - B position
- (47.199522740492526,
-0.21225708405055588, 16.55) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 64.6 %
- Input A u2
- 14.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.6 %
- Input B u2
- 10.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-50.118495803152975,
0.8074672930453309, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.1 %
- u2
- 17.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-50.118495803152975,
0.8074672930453309, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 20.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-50.118495803152975,
0.8074672930453309, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-50.118495803152975,
0.8074672930453309, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.1 %
- Input B u2
- 17.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.8 %
- u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-50.09658181653711,
-1.6876360090386755, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.3 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-50.09658181653711,
-1.6876360090386755, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-50.09658181653711,
-1.6876360090386755, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-50.09658181653711,
-1.6876360090386755, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.8 %
- Input A u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.3 %
- Input B u2
- 10.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.1 %
- u2
- 17.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-49.950528360765084,
-4.1785573443957285, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.4 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-49.950528360765084,
-4.1785573443957285, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 22.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-49.950528360765084,
-4.1785573443957285, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-49.950528360765084,
-4.1785573443957285, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 69.1 %
- Input A u2
- 17.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.4 %
- Input B u2
- 8.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-003
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
69.1 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-49.680697356706766,
-6.659124203024777, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.3 %
- u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-49.680697356706766,
-6.659124203024777, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-49.680697356706766,
-6.659124203024777, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-49.680697356706766,
-6.659124203024777, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 69.1 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.3 %
- Input B u2
- 9.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-004
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.5 %
- u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-49.28775744634112,
-9.123189733346923, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.1 %
- u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-49.28775744634112,
-9.123189733346923, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 21.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-49.28775744634112,
-9.123189733346923, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-49.28775744634112,
-9.123189733346923, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.5 %
- Input A u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.1 %
- Input B u2
- 11.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-005
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-48.77268233585955,
-11.564647974120724, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 6.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-48.77268233585955,
-11.564647974120724, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-48.77268233585955,
-11.564647974120724, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-48.77268233585955,
-11.564647974120724, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.2 %
- u2
- 17.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-48.13674838281925,
-13.977448985031169, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-48.13674838281925,
-13.977448985031169, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-48.13674838281925,
-13.977448985031169, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-48.13674838281925,
-13.977448985031169, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.2 %
- Input A u2
- 17.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.4 %
- Input B u2
- 7.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-47.38153143332561,
-16.35561383845858, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.7 %
- u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-47.38153143332561,
-16.35561383845858, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−3.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-47.38153143332561,
-16.35561383845858, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-47.38153143332561,
-16.35561383845858, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.7 %
- Input B u2
- 11.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.50890291708118,
-18.69324943527793, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.5 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-46.50890291708118,
-18.69324943527793, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+1.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-46.50890291708118,
-18.69324943527793, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-46.50890291708118,
-18.69324943527793, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.5 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-45.52102520997766,
-20.984563107974843, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-45.52102520997766,
-20.984563107974843, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-45.52102520997766,
-20.984563107974843, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-45.52102520997766,
-20.984563107974843, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 74.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 8.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.1 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.42034627572246,
-23.223876974891837, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.7 %
- u2
- 13.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-44.42034627572246,
-23.223876974891837, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-44.42034627572246,
-23.223876974891837, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-44.42034627572246,
-23.223876974891837, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.1 %
- Input A u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.7 %
- Input B u2
- 13.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.6 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.20959359977773,
-25.40564201003485, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.3 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-43.20959359977773,
-25.40564201003485, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.8 percentage points
- A position
- (-43.20959359977773,
-25.40564201003485, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-43.20959359977773,
-25.40564201003485, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.3 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.89176743064393,
-27.52445179357514, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.0 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-41.89176743064393,
-27.52445179357514, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-41.89176743064393,
-27.52445179357514, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-41.89176743064393,
-27.52445179357514, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.0 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.1 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.470133345235546,
-29.575055908972598, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
76.2 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-40.470133345235546,
-29.575055908972598, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-40.470133345235546,
-29.575055908972598, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-40.470133345235546,
-29.575055908972598, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.1 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 76.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.7 %
- u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.94821415677253,
-31.552372953522603, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
82.0 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.94821415677253,
-31.552372953522603, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-38.94821415677253,
-31.552372953522603, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-38.94821415677253,
-31.552372953522603, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 74.7 %
- Input A u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 82.0 %
- Input B u2
- 6.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.4 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.329781185239284,
-33.45150313008604, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.8 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-37.329781185239284,
-33.45150313008604, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (-37.329781185239284,
-33.45150313008604, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-37.329781185239284,
-33.45150313008604, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.4 %
- Input A u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 13.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.6188449120432,
-35.267740388800284, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.0 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-35.6188449120432,
-35.267740388800284, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-35.6188449120432,
-35.267740388800284, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-35.6188449120432,
-35.267740388800284, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.7 %
- Input A u2
- 13.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.7 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.819645042030686,
-36.996584088683775, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.0 %
- u2
- 7.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-33.819645042030686,
-36.996584088683775, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-33.819645042030686,
-36.996584088683775, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-33.819645042030686,
-36.996584088683775, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.936639997486655,
-38.633750150236985, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-31.936639997486655,
-38.633750150236985, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-31.936639997486655,
-38.633750150236985, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-31.936639997486655,
-38.633750150236985, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.2 %
- Input A u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.8 %
- Input B u2
- 12.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-019
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.974495870151735,
-40.175181671403266, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.3 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-29.974495870151735,
-40.175181671403266, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-29.974495870151735,
-40.175181671403266, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-29.974495870151735,
-40.175181671403266, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.3 %
- Input B u2
- 11.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-020
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.938074858633957,
-41.6170589805835, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.4 %
- u2
- 2.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-27.938074858633957,
-41.6170589805835, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-27.938074858633957,
-41.6170589805835, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-27.938074858633957,
-41.6170589805835, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.4 %
- Input A u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.4 %
- Input B u2
- 2.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-021
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.832423219867056,
-42.9558091017929, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.1 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.832423219867056,
-42.9558091017929, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.832423219867056,
-42.9558091017929, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-25.832423219867056,
-42.9558091017929, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.9 %
- Input A u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.1 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-022
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
91.3 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.66275876447176,
-44.18811460850548, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.2 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-23.66275876447176,
-44.18811460850548, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-23.66275876447176,
-44.18811460850548, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-23.66275876447176,
-44.18811460850548, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 91.3 %
- Input A u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.2 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-023
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.43445792700654,
-45.310921844246195, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.9 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.43445792700654,
-45.310921844246195, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.43445792700654,
-45.310921844246195, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-21.43445792700654,
-45.310921844246195, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 3.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-024
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.153042443147815,
-46.3214484895602, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.9 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-19.153042443147815,
-46.3214484895602, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-19.153042443147815,
-46.3214484895602, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-19.153042443147815,
-46.3214484895602, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 87.1 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-025
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.8 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.8241656668136,
-47.217190456608186, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.2 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-16.8241656668136,
-47.217190456608186, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-16.8241656668136,
-47.217190456608186, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-16.8241656668136,
-47.217190456608186, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.8 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.2 %
- Input B u2
- 2.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-026
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
87.4 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.453598561136697,
-47.99592809430304, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.8 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.453598561136697,
-47.99592809430304, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- A position
- (-14.453598561136697,
-47.99592809430304, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-14.453598561136697,
-47.99592809430304, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 87.4 %
- Input A u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.8 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-027
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.5 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.047215398002095,
-48.65573168861138, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.4 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.047215398002095,
-48.65573168861138, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.047215398002095,
-48.65573168861138, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-12.047215398002095,
-48.65573168861138, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.5 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.4 %
- Input B u2
- 5.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-028
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.0 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.610979201584804,
-49.19496624439034, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.0 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.610979201584804,
-49.19496624439034, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.0 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-9.610979201584804,
-49.19496624439034, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-9.610979201584804,
-49.19496624439034, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.0 %
- Input A u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.0 %
- Input B u2
- 7.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-029
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.8 %
- u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.150926971959401,
-49.61229553691005, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.9 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.150926971959401,
-49.61229553691005, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.150926971959401,
-49.61229553691005, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-7.150926971959401,
-49.61229553691005, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-030
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.8 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.673154725397025,
-49.90668542302224, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.5 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-4.673154725397025,
-49.90668542302224, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-4.673154725397025,
-49.90668542302224, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-4.673154725397025,
-49.90668542302224, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 82.8 %
- Input A u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.5 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-031
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.0 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.1838023884201,
-50.07740640376987, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-2.1838023884201,
-50.07740640376987, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-2.1838023884201,
-50.07740640376987, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-2.1838023884201,
-50.07740640376987, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.0 %
- Input A u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 8.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-032
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.31096141695266666,
-50.124035432087545, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.2 %
- u2
- 2.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (0.31096141695266666,
-50.124035432087545, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- A position
- (0.31096141695266666,
-50.124035432087545, 16.3875) m - B position
- (0.31096141695266666,
-50.124035432087545, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 83.8 %
- Input A u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.2 %
- Input B u2
- 2.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-033
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.0 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.8049546590688545,
-50.04645696111333, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
92.4 %
- u2
- 4.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.8049546590688545,
-50.04645696111333, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.7 percentage points
- A position
- (2.8049546590688545,
-50.04645696111333, 16.3875) m - B position
- (2.8049546590688545,
-50.04645696111333, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 92.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-034
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.4 %
- u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.291997215733895,
-49.84486323051419, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.8 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.291997215733895,
-49.84486323051419, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- A position
- (5.291997215733895,
-49.84486323051419, 16.3875) m - B position
- (5.291997215733895,
-49.84486323051419, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 81.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.9 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-035
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.0 %
- u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.765926188571154,
-49.51975379011557, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.765926188571154,
-49.51975379011557, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (7.765926188571154,
-49.51975379011557, 16.3875) m - B position
- (7.765926188571154,
-49.51975379011557, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 6.3 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-036
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.6 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.22061117470118,
-49.07193426201553, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
94.2 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (10.22061117470118,
-49.07193426201553, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.1 percentage points
- A position
- (10.22061117470118,
-49.07193426201553, 16.3875) m - B position
- (10.22061117470118,
-49.07193426201553, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 94.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-037
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
82.7 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.649969457897155,
-48.502514344250955, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.2 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.649969457897155,
-48.502514344250955, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- A position
- (12.649969457897155,
-48.502514344250955, 16.3875) m - B position
- (12.649969457897155,
-48.502514344250955, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 82.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-038
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.3 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.047981081572608,
-47.81290506096271, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.047981081572608,
-47.81290506096271, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- A position
- (15.047981081572608,
-47.81290506096271, 16.3875) m - B position
- (15.047981081572608,
-47.81290506096271, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-039
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.408703766250596,
-47.00481526587391, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (17.408703766250596,
-47.00481526587391, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (17.408703766250596,
-47.00481526587391, 16.3875) m - B position
- (17.408703766250596,
-47.00481526587391, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.7 %
- Input B u2
- 7.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-040
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.72628763454879,
-46.08024740774564, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.4 %
- u2
- 4.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (19.72628763454879,
-46.08024740774564, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- A position
- (19.72628763454879,
-46.08024740774564, 16.3875) m - B position
- (19.72628763454879,
-46.08024740774564, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.0 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-041
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.99498970719188,
-45.041492568303326, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.4 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.99498970719188,
-45.041492568303326, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- A position
- (21.99498970719188,
-45.041492568303326, 16.3875) m - B position
- (21.99498970719188,
-45.041492568303326, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.4 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-042
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.209188134130258,
-43.89112478492989, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.2 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.209188134130258,
-43.89112478492989, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.6 percentage points
- A position
- (24.209188134130258,
-43.89112478492989, 16.3875) m - B position
- (24.209188134130258,
-43.89112478492989, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-043
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
85.6 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.36339612550003,
-42.63199467219392, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
95.8 %
- u2
- 5.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (26.36339612550003,
-42.63199467219392, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+10.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.1 percentage points
- A position
- (26.36339612550003,
-42.63199467219392, 16.3875) m - B position
- (26.36339612550003,
-42.63199467219392, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 85.6 %
- Input A u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 95.8 %
- Input B u2
- 5.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-044
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.7 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.452275547903596,
-41.26722235801881, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (28.452275547903596,
-41.26722235801881, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.0 percentage points
- A position
- (28.452275547903596,
-41.26722235801881, 16.3875) m - B position
- (28.452275547903596,
-41.26722235801881, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.7 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 10.8 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-045
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.6 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.47065015231905,
-39.80018975199716, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.6 %
- u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (30.47065015231905,
-39.80018975199716, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- A position
- (30.47065015231905,
-39.80018975199716, 16.3875) m - B position
- (30.47065015231905,
-39.80018975199716, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.6 %
- Input A u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.6 %
- Input B u2
- 8.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-046
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.9 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.41351840085967,
-38.23453216500932, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.1 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.41351840085967,
-38.23453216500932, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- A position
- (32.41351840085967,
-38.23453216500932, 16.3875) m - B position
- (32.41351840085967,
-38.23453216500932, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-047
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
71.5 %
- u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.27606586059874,
-36.57412930091294, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.8 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.27606586059874,
-36.57412930091294, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- A position
- (34.27606586059874,
-36.57412930091294, 16.3875) m - B position
- (34.27606586059874,
-36.57412930091294, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 71.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.8 %
- Input B u2
- 6.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-048
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
73.5 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.0536771337477,
-34.82309564262602, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.6 %
- u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.0536771337477,
-34.82309564262602, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.9 percentage points
- A position
- (36.0536771337477,
-34.82309564262602, 16.3875) m - B position
- (36.0536771337477,
-34.82309564262602, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 73.5 %
- Input A u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.6 %
- Input B u2
- 9.1 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-049
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.4 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.74194729462473,
-32.98577025642678, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (37.74194729462473,
-32.98577025642678, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.1 percentage points
- A position
- (37.74194729462473,
-32.98577025642678, 16.3875) m - B position
- (37.74194729462473,
-32.98577025642678, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.4 %
- Input A u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.8 %
- Input B u2
- 7.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-050
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
64.6 %
- u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.33669280507286,
-31.066706039735372, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.1 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (39.33669280507286,
-31.066706039735372, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+26.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.1 percentage points
- A position
- (39.33669280507286,
-31.066706039735372, 16.3875) m - B position
- (39.33669280507286,
-31.066706039735372, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 64.6 %
- Input A u2
- 9.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.1 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-051
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
67.3 %
- u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.83396188127915,
-29.07065843902133, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.4 %
- u2
- 8.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (40.83396188127915,
-29.07065843902133, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+24.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (40.83396188127915,
-29.07065843902133, 16.3875) m - B position
- (40.83396188127915,
-29.07065843902133, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 67.3 %
- Input A u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.4 %
- Input B u2
- 8.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-052
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.5 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.23004428630598,
-27.00257366579408, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.9 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (42.23004428630598,
-27.00257366579408, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+16.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 13.8 percentage points
- A position
- (42.23004428630598,
-27.00257366579408, 16.3875) m - B position
- (42.23004428630598,
-27.00257366579408, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 75.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.9 %
- Input B u2
- 5.4 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-053
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.0 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.521480524068515,
-24.867576439876995, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.3 %
- u2
- 3.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (43.521480524068515,
-24.867576439876995, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.3 percentage points
- A position
- (43.521480524068515,
-24.867576439876995, 16.3875) m - B position
- (43.521480524068515,
-24.867576439876995, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.0 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.3 %
- Input B u2
- 3.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-054
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.6 %
- u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.705070411975605,
-22.670957290337434, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.0 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (44.705070411975605,
-22.670957290337434, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (44.705070411975605,
-22.670957290337434, 16.3875) m - B position
- (44.705070411975605,
-22.670957290337434, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.6 %
- Input A u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.0 %
- Input B u2
- 6.0 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-055
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.8 %
- u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (45.777881010991194,
-20.41815944554094, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (45.777881010991194,
-20.41815944554094, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.7 percentage points
- A position
- (45.777881010991194,
-20.41815944554094, 16.3875) m - B position
- (45.777881010991194,
-20.41815944554094, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.8 %
- Input A u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 9.6 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-056
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.9 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.737253893465365,
-18.11476534481629, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.0 %
- u2
- 4.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (46.737253893465365,
-18.11476534481629, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- A position
- (46.737253893465365,
-18.11476534481629, 16.3875) m - B position
- (46.737253893465365,
-18.11476534481629, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.9 %
- Input A u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.0 %
- Input B u2
- 4.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-057
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.1 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (47.58081173072549,
-15.766482805155247, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (47.58081173072549,
-15.766482805155247, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.9 percentage points
- A position
- (47.58081173072549,
-15.766482805155247, 16.3875) m - B position
- (47.58081173072549,
-15.766482805155247, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.1 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.8 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-058
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.5 %
- u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (48.30646418410329,
-13.379130877226165, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 7.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (48.30646418410329,
-13.379130877226165, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.4 percentage points
- A position
- (48.30646418410329,
-13.379130877226165, 16.3875) m - B position
- (48.30646418410329,
-13.379130877226165, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.5 %
- Input A u2
- 7.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 85.8 %
- Input B u2
- 7.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-059
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (48.91241308479986,
-10.95862542575027, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.3 %
- u2
- 8.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (48.91241308479986,
-10.95862542575027, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.3 percentage points
- A position
- (48.91241308479986,
-10.95862542575027, 16.3875) m - B position
- (48.91241308479986,
-10.95862542575027, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.9 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.3 %
- Input B u2
- 8.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-060
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.0 %
- u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (49.39715688975296,
-8.510964469972386, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.1 %
- u2
- 16.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (49.39715688975296,
-8.510964469972386, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+9.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 21.3 percentage points
- A position
- (49.39715688975296,
-8.510964469972386, 16.3875) m - B position
- (49.39715688975296,
-8.510964469972386, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.0 %
- Input A u2
- 9.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.1 %
- Input B u2
- 16.2 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-061
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.9 %
- u2
- 14.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (49.75949440246492,
-6.0422133205525785, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.1 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (49.75949440246492,
-6.0422133205525785, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 18.2 percentage points
- A position
- (49.75949440246492,
-6.0422133205525785, 16.3875) m - B position
- (49.75949440246492,
-6.0422133205525785, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.9 %
- Input A u2
- 14.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.1 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-062
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.3 %
- u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (49.99852774957088,
-3.5584895497094444, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
78.9 %
- u2
- 10.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (49.99852774957088,
-3.5584895497094444, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- A position
- (49.99852774957088,
-3.5584895497094444, 16.3875) m - B position
- (49.99852774957088,
-3.5584895497094444, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 76.3 %
- Input A u2
- 5.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 78.9 %
- Input B u2
- 10.9 percentage points
Map sample grid-18-063
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
63.6 %
- u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (50.113664605771504,
-1.0659478318591393, 16.3875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.2 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (50.113664605771504,
-1.0659478318591393, 17.4875) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+24.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 11.5 percentage points
- A position
- (50.113664605771504,
-1.0659478318591393, 16.3875) m - B position
- (50.113664605771504,
-1.0659478318591393, 17.4875) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 63.6 %
- Input A u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.2 %
- Input B u2
- 7.5 percentage points
Map sample grid-03-000
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.2 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.405647447941464,
4.1805886673550665, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-001
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 2.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.267674812870476,
8.631578921939097, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-002
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
64.7 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.800309259237546,
12.147203667584483, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-006
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.7 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-9.615154260281995,
11.512984345988706, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-007
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 1.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.832438587090383,
7.767143613230913, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-008
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.8 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.659129077187242,
3.179612350328817, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-009
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.8 %
- u2
- 4.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-14.89727547194723,
-1.752479247500365, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-010
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.7 %
- u2
- 2.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-13.521070914276057,
-6.494662526345616, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-011
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
83.8 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-10.67964852201129,
-10.533048345389005, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-012
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.0 %
- u2
- 3.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-6.680920500565903,
-13.43001493912491, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-013
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.3 %
- u2
- 3.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-1.958211077721637,
-14.871631026053876, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-014
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (2.9767009001692903,
-14.701675134178803, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-015
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.589041147253466,
-12.938564621521731, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-016
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
85.4 %
- u2
- 3.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (11.378991029926505,
-9.773359869607388, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-017
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.6 %
- u2
- 3.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.935850671269225,
-5.549059926517742, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Map sample grid-03-018
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
No counterpart in A: this sample exists only in B.
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 2.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (14.982544655377088,
-0.7234332378536876, 1.2) m - Validity
- Valid
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Confidence
- Judged
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
No counterpart: this sample exists only in B. No contrast is defined.
Worked receiver
Receiver seat-5I03
A receiver identifier names a seating rank: the corresponding wedge, tier and row in each configuration. Because their seating geometries differ, the coordinates can differ too; the identifier does not name one fixed point in space.
Original receiver-correspondence note
Seat IDs are homologous row ranks with state-specific coordinates; the two configurations have different cavea geometry, so a seat ID is not a fixed world point.
Contrast and u2 use unrounded matched computation, not subtraction or comparison of shown values.
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)
- D50
- 80.6 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)
- D50
- 91.7 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − A
- B − A
- +11.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
Inspect exact positions and matched inputs in the receiver table.
Coordinates reproduce the stored model values, in metres. In scientific notation, the number before e is multiplied by 10 raised to the number after it. The stored coordinate digits do not indicate measurement precision.
All 24 receiver ranks Separate from the map-sample population
Values and uncertainties are published unchanged. Select an identifier for exact positions, contrast inputs and statuses.
Focus this scroll region and use arrow keys.
Receiver ranks and matched contrasts
| Receiver identifierSelect for details | Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%) / u2 (percentage points) | Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%) / u2 (percentage points) | Difference, B − AD50 difference / matched u2 (both in percentage points) | Published statusA / B / B − A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.2 % / 5.8 percentage points | 87.5 % / 4.8 percentage points | +4.3 percentage points / 7.1 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.5 % / 4.4 percentage points | 88.3 % / 5.7 percentage points | +3.8 percentage points / 6.4 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.8 % / 6.2 percentage points | 90.9 % / 4.0 percentage points | +6.1 percentage points / 10.6 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.6 % / 6.3 percentage points | 91.7 % / 5.4 percentage points | +11.2 percentage points / 7.2 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.2 % / 7.5 percentage points | 91.4 % / 4.8 percentage points | +11.2 percentage points / 8.9 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.6 % / 6.0 percentage points | 91.0 % / 3.9 percentage points | +7.4 percentage points / 9.6 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.8 % / 2.1 percentage points | 89.7 % / 4.7 percentage points | +4.9 percentage points / 4.5 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 83.0 % / 3.1 percentage points | 87.6 % / 8.8 percentage points | +4.6 percentage points / 7.1 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.9 % / 2.5 percentage points | 91.2 % / 5.7 percentage points | +6.2 percentage points / 9.3 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.0 % / 5.1 percentage points | 80.1 % / 16.9 percentage points | +2.2 percentage points / 15.5 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.4 % / 7.6 percentage points | 77.9 % / 9.7 percentage points | +0.5 percentage points / 17.7 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 84.4 % / 6.2 percentage points | 81.6 % / 5.5 percentage points | −2.8 percentage points / 8.0 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 74.8 % / 6.8 percentage points | 89.2 % / 5.9 percentage points | +14.4 percentage points / 8.5 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 76.1 % / 9.8 percentage points | 91.4 % / 1.8 percentage points | +15.3 percentage points / 8.4 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.3 % / 6.3 percentage points | 91.3 % / 6.9 percentage points | +12.9 percentage points / 4.8 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 79.2 % / 7.9 percentage points | 84.5 % / 10.2 percentage points | +5.3 percentage points / 5.9 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 68.8 % / 9.4 percentage points | 87.2 % / 6.2 percentage points | +18.4 percentage points / 8.1 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 77.4 % / 4.7 percentage points | 86.2 % / 4.6 percentage points | +8.8 percentage points / 7.4 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.7 % / 6.0 percentage points | 84.2 % / 11.6 percentage points | +3.5 percentage points / 6.5 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 75.9 % / 12.8 percentage points | 75.2 % / 10.8 percentage points | −0.7 percentage points / 17.1 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 81.7 % / 10.5 percentage points | 87.2 % / 11.6 percentage points | +5.4 percentage points / 14.0 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.4 % / 9.4 percentage points | 89.2 % / 8.8 percentage points | +8.8 percentage points / 12.3 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 78.9 % / 8.3 percentage points | 84.7 % / 8.6 percentage points | +5.8 percentage points / 9.8 percentage points | Published / Published / Unresolved at matched conditional u2 | |
| 80.3 % / 11.2 percentage points | 93.9 % / 1.6 percentage points | +13.6 percentage points / 12.2 percentage points | Published / Published / Resolved at matched conditional u2 |
Receiver rank seat-2I12
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.2 %
- u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-21.85769197408659,
-11.999813605466997, 5.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.5 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-24.16603722634625,
-13.267088887643178, 8.112499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-21.85769197408659,
-11.999813605466997, 5.5125) m - B position
- (-24.16603722634625,
-13.267088887643178, 8.112499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.2 %
- Input A u2
- 5.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.5 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-3I03
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-12.123129024575206,
-14.033772395671173, 2.1375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
88.3 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-13.844576302262707,
-16.02652519383424, 4.7375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.4 percentage points
- A position
- (-12.123129024575206,
-14.033772395671173, 2.1375) m - B position
- (-13.844576302262707,
-16.02652519383424, 4.7375) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.5 %
- Input A u2
- 4.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 88.3 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-4I08
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-7.705715290959843,
-20.70775161273352, 4.0125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
90.9 %
- u2
- 4.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-8.62410030715631,
-23.175749466555576, 6.6125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.1 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 10.6 percentage points
- A position
- (-7.705715290959843,
-20.70775161273352, 4.0125) m - B position
- (-8.62410030715631,
-23.175749466555576, 6.6125) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 90.9 %
- Input B u2
- 4.0 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-5I03
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.6 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.25337094284409e-15,
-18.545, 2.1375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.7 %
- u2
- 5.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (5.99933356436774e-15,
-21.178333333333335, 4.7375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.2 percentage points
- A position
- (5.25337094284409e-15,
-18.545, 2.1375) m - B position
- (5.99933356436774e-15,
-21.178333333333335, 4.7375) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.6 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.7 %
- Input B u2
- 5.4 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-5I12
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.2 %
- u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.063510620642619e-15,
-24.935000000000002, 5.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.4 %
- u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.80947324216627e-15,
-27.568333333333335, 8.112499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+11.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.9 percentage points
- A position
- (7.063510620642619e-15,
-24.935000000000002, 5.5125) m - B position
- (7.80947324216627e-15,
-27.568333333333335, 8.112499999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.4 %
- Input B u2
- 4.8 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-6I08
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.6 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (7.70571529095985,
-20.70775161273352, 4.0125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.0 %
- u2
- 3.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (8.624100307156317,
-23.175749466555573, 6.6125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+7.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.6 percentage points
- A position
- (7.70571529095985,
-20.70775161273352, 4.0125) m - B position
- (8.624100307156317,
-23.175749466555573, 6.6125) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.6 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.0 %
- Input B u2
- 3.9 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-7I03
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.8 %
- u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (12.123129024575215,
-14.033772395671168, 2.1375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.7 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (13.844576302262716,
-16.02652519383423, 4.7375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.5 percentage points
- A position
- (12.123129024575215,
-14.033772395671168, 2.1375) m - B position
- (13.844576302262716,
-16.02652519383423, 4.7375) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.8 %
- Input A u2
- 2.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.7 %
- Input B u2
- 4.7 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-8I12
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
83.0 %
- u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (21.857691974086595,
-11.999813605466985, 5.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.6 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (24.16603722634626,
-13.267088887643165, 8.112499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+4.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.1 percentage points
- A position
- (21.857691974086595,
-11.999813605466985, 5.5125) m - B position
- (24.16603722634626,
-13.267088887643165, 8.112499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 83.0 %
- Input A u2
- 3.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.6 %
- Input B u2
- 8.8 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-1M05
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.9 %
- u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.673009667980025,
-5.092585351681756, 9.6375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.2 %
- u2
- 5.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-34.57077318158564,
-5.077569405907074, 10.737499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+6.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.3 percentage points
- A position
- (-34.673009667980025,
-5.092585351681756, 9.6375) m - B position
- (-34.57077318158564,
-5.077569405907074, 10.737499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.9 %
- Input A u2
- 2.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.7 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-1M10
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.0 %
- u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.1853276683033,
-5.608455746844269, 11.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
80.1 %
- u2
- 16.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-38.08309118190891,
-5.593439801069585, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+2.2 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 15.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-38.1853276683033,
-5.608455746844269, 11.5125) m - B position
- (-38.08309118190891,
-5.593439801069585, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.0 %
- Input A u2
- 5.1 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 80.1 %
- Input B u2
- 16.9 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-2M15
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.94375088220891,
-20.282019025562725, 13.3875) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
77.9 %
- u2
- 9.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-36.85317024572784,
-20.232290501831763, 14.487499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+0.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.7 percentage points
- A position
- (-36.94375088220891,
-20.282019025562725, 13.3875) m - B position
- (-36.85317024572784,
-20.232290501831763, 14.487499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 77.4 %
- Input A u2
- 7.6 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 77.9 %
- Input B u2
- 9.7 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-3M10
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
84.4 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.230097854056627,
-29.20644085257099, 11.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
81.6 %
- u2
- 5.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-25.162547391261292,
-29.128244223782307, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−2.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-25.230097854056627,
-29.20644085257099, 11.5125) m - B position
- (-25.162547391261292,
-29.128244223782307, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 84.4 %
- Input A u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 81.6 %
- Input B u2
- 5.5 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-4M20
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
74.8 %
- u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.936305056366148,
-42.826010859645095, 15.2625) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.2 %
- u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-15.900267163325525,
-42.729165374241944, 16.3625) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+14.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.5 percentage points
- A position
- (-15.936305056366148,
-42.826010859645095, 15.2625) m - B position
- (-15.900267163325525,
-42.729165374241944, 16.3625) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 74.8 %
- Input A u2
- 6.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.2 %
- Input B u2
- 5.9 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-5M10
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
76.1 %
- u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.0933073687736191e-14,
-38.595000000000006, 11.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.4 %
- u2
- 1.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.0903801736765008e-14,
-38.49166666666667, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+15.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.4 percentage points
- A position
- (1.0933073687736191e-14,
-38.595000000000006, 11.5125) m - B position
- (1.0903801736765008e-14,
-38.49166666666667, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 76.1 %
- Input A u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.4 %
- Input B u2
- 1.8 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-6M20
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.3 %
- u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.93630505636616,
-42.82601085964509, 15.2625) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
91.3 %
- u2
- 6.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (15.90026716332554,
-42.72916537424194, 16.3625) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+12.9 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 4.8 percentage points
- A position
- (15.93630505636616,
-42.82601085964509, 15.2625) m - B position
- (15.90026716332554,
-42.72916537424194, 16.3625) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 78.3 %
- Input A u2
- 6.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 91.3 %
- Input B u2
- 6.9 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-7M10
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
79.2 %
- u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.230097854056645,
-29.206440852570974, 11.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.5 %
- u2
- 10.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (25.162547391261306,
-29.128244223782293, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.3 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 5.9 percentage points
- A position
- (25.230097854056645,
-29.206440852570974, 11.5125) m - B position
- (25.162547391261306,
-29.128244223782293, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 79.2 %
- Input A u2
- 7.9 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.5 %
- Input B u2
- 10.2 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-8M15
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
68.8 %
- u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.943750882208924,
-20.282019025562704, 13.3875) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 6.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (36.85317024572785,
-20.23229050183174, 14.487499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+18.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 8.1 percentage points
- A position
- (36.943750882208924,
-20.282019025562704, 13.3875) m - B position
- (36.85317024572785,
-20.23229050183174, 14.487499999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 68.8 %
- Input A u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 6.2 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-9M05
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
77.4 %
- u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.67300966798003,
-5.092585351681738, 9.6375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
86.2 %
- u2
- 4.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (34.57077318158565,
-5.077569405907054, 10.737499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 7.4 percentage points
- A position
- (34.67300966798003,
-5.092585351681738, 9.6375) m - B position
- (34.57077318158565,
-5.077569405907054, 10.737499999999999) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 77.4 %
- Input A u2
- 4.7 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 86.2 %
- Input B u2
- 4.6 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-9M10
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.7 %
- u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.18532766830331,
-5.608455746844248, 11.5125) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.2 %
- u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (38.08309118190892,
-5.593439801069564, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+3.5 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 6.5 percentage points
- A position
- (38.18532766830331,
-5.608455746844248, 11.5125) m - B position
- (38.08309118190892,
-5.593439801069564, 12.612499999999999) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.7 %
- Input A u2
- 6.0 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.2 %
- Input B u2
- 11.6 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-1S05
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
75.9 %
- u2
- 12.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-50.99786797934173,
-7.490292822155405, 17.1375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
75.2 %
- u2
- 10.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-50.99786797934173,
-7.490292822155405, 18.2375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
−0.7 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 17.1 percentage points
- A position
- (-50.99786797934173,
-7.490292822155405, 17.1375) m - B position
- (-50.99786797934173,
-7.490292822155405, 18.2375) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 75.9 %
- Input A u2
- 12.8 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 75.2 %
- Input B u2
- 10.8 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-3S03
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
81.7 %
- u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.76742207370355,
-37.931671142249535, 16.3875) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
87.2 %
- u2
- 11.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (-32.76742207370355,
-37.931671142249535, 17.4875) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.4 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 14.0 percentage points
- A position
- (-32.76742207370355,
-37.931671142249535, 16.3875) m - B position
- (-32.76742207370355,
-37.931671142249535, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 81.7 %
- Input A u2
- 10.5 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 87.2 %
- Input B u2
- 11.6 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-5S05
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.4 %
- u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.4601510123963258e-14,
-51.54500000000001, 17.1375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
89.2 %
- u2
- 8.8 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (1.4601510123963258e-14,
-51.54500000000001, 18.2375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+8.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.3 percentage points
- A position
- (1.4601510123963258e-14,
-51.54500000000001, 17.1375) m - B position
- (1.4601510123963258e-14,
-51.54500000000001, 18.2375) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 80.4 %
- Input A u2
- 9.4 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 89.2 %
- Input B u2
- 8.8 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-7S03
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
78.9 %
- u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.76742207370357,
-37.93167114224951, 16.3875) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
84.7 %
- u2
- 8.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (32.76742207370357,
-37.93167114224951, 17.4875) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+5.8 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 9.8 percentage points
- A position
- (32.76742207370357,
-37.93167114224951, 16.3875) m - B position
- (32.76742207370357,
-37.93167114224951, 17.4875) m - Status
- Unresolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- No
- Qualifying
- No
- Contrast input A
- 78.9 %
- Input A u2
- 8.3 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 84.7 %
- Input B u2
- 8.6 percentage points
Receiver rank seat-9S05
Roman reconstruction hypothesis (A)D50 (%)
80.3 %
- u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (50.997867979341734,
-7.490292822155377, 17.1375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
Ruin configuration as simulated (B)D50 (%)
93.9 %
- u2
- 1.6 percentage points
- Position (x, y, z)
- (50.997867979341734,
-7.490292822155377, 18.2375) m - Status
- Published
- Precision
- Within the conditional precision target
Published difference, B − AD50 difference (percentage points)
+13.6 percentage points
- Matched u2
- 12.2 percentage points
- A position
- (50.997867979341734,
-7.490292822155377, 17.1375) m - B position
- (50.997867979341734,
-7.490292822155377, 18.2375) m - Status
- Resolved at matched conditional u2
- Precision
- u2 is larger than the conditional precision target
- Resolved
- Yes
- Qualifying
- Yes
- Contrast input A
- 80.3 %
- Input A u2
- 11.2 percentage points
- Contrast input B
- 93.9 %
- Input B u2
- 1.6 percentage points
How to read these numbers
A value’s u2 is its conditional uncertainty: an approximate expanded uncertainty, twice the sampling spread estimated by resampling the simulated rays. A matched difference has its own u2, from resampling the same rays in both configurations.
UM is the corresponding figure for the median difference: the median is taken within each matched replicate of that resampling, and UM is twice the spread estimated from those medians.
Neither is total model uncertainty, a confidence interval or an audibility test. Records are formatted without subtraction, averaging or re-estimation.
Original study statements
These statements are quoted unchanged from the wider study. References to future verification or publication concern additional measures or private diagnostics not presented in this edition. Technical identifiers are retained for traceability. Read the first quotation with its qualification.
What the model can establish
This model has not been calibrated against measured impulse responses from the Teatro Antico di Taormina; no public per-position dataset exists. Materials are literature values for comparable Greco-Roman theatres, cited individually. Ray acoustics does not model edge diffraction; low-frequency results near the scaenae-frons gap and seat rows carry extra uncertainty. Results are a physically consistent reconstruction with stated sensitivity ranges — what our model predicts, not what it sounded like.
Conditional ray uncertainty
How precise these numbers are, and what that does and does not mean (ADR 0012 D9). The direct sound is deterministic. The reflected energy is sampled by a FINITE DETERMINISTIC release lattice, and the uncertainty published beside every D50, C50, C80, Ts and G is conditional internal release-ray resampling of that run's own rays: an approximate expanded uncertainty u2 = 2 sigma_N, NOT an ISO compliance statement and NOT total model uncertainty - geometry, materials, model form and calibration are outside it, and a bias shared by every resample is invisible to it. Precision misses stay visible: a value whose u2 exceeds its target is published and flagged, never withheld or quietly smoothed. A pooled layer, where one is shown, is a separately labelled regional estimate and is not 2.5 m-resolved. Echogram EDT is published only where its fit passes the decay-linearity and trusted-range gates; a failed fit is null with its reason, while a valid EDT remains numeric. The echogram estimator does not produce T20 or T30: their null reason is metric_not_produced_by_estimator, not a claim that their decay fits failed. An A/B or occupancy contrast needs matched-ray resampling: two bars whose intervals overlap have not been shown to differ, and two that do not overlap have not been compared correctly either until the same rays are used on both sides.
Timing convention
TIMING (ADR 0014, contract v0.4). D50, C50, C80, Ts and t0 are the POINT-EQUIVALENT EVENT estimator: contiguous pieces of one ray in one cell are coalesced into complete visits (D1), each visit is booked at the energy-weighted centroid of its in-cell chord (D2), t0 is the exact unbinned energy-weighted centroid of the visible direct quadrature nodes - or the earliest complete reflected-visit centroid where there is no direct energy (D3) - and the four parameters come from exact E / E50 / E80 / sum(E t) accumulators over strictly half-open windows [t0, t0+50 ms) and [t0, t0+80 ms) (D4). G carries the D5 reference taken IN THE RUN'S AIR, which is +alpha_b*10 dB above the air-free reference a v0.3 document used. The 1 ms entry-booked histogram is UNCHANGED and is kept for the ADR 0011 D5 IR synthesis and for EDT, on its own frozen origin synthesis_histogram_t0_s; the legacy value of each metric travels beside the exact one as <metric>_histogram with the signed <metric>_hist_minus_exact difference, so the change is auditable from this document alone. Energies, the direct/reflected split, both visit counters, the histograms and EDT did not move. A v0.3 document and a v0.4 document of the same run must never be mixed in one view: the producer SCHEMA ID, never a date, is how a renderer tells them apart.
Impulse-response energy closure
CLOSURE, NARROWED (ADR 0014 D7). The ADR 0011 D5 energy closure of a synthesised impulse response holds for TOTAL ENERGY, for the direct/reflected split and for the HISTOGRAM window partitions of that waveform. It does NOT claim that those histogram partitions equal the published D50 / C50 / C80 / Ts, which are the exact point-equivalent event values of ADR 0014 D1-D4 on a different origin. The signed difference between the two is published per cell and per seat (<metric>_hist_minus_exact), so the gap is a number a reader can see rather than an assumption. Nothing may be read back off a synthesised waveform and quoted as a published parameter.
Geometry representation
Geometry representation: the bounded A/B screen found locally material effects, including some reversed architectural contrasts; the original ranges do not include it.